SPHY ranks 1st and IFLN 40th of 84 funds in the US High Yield Category.
IFLN vs SPHY
SPHY −0.18pt a year
0.23%0.05%
SPHY 109.3×the volume
54.5K5.95M
IFLN vs SPHY Performance
−2.2%−1.1%
- IFLN 0.23%
- SPHY 0.05%, better
- IFLN $290M
- SPHY $11.9B
- IFLN
- SPHY +2.0%
- IFLN 6.25%
- SPHY 7.37%, better
- IFLN 120
- SPHY 1913
- IFLN 54.5K sh
- SPHY 5.95M sh, better
- IFLN $17.36
- SPHY $22.58
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IFLN | SPHY |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A81 | A98Higher |
| Mission | A79 | A100Higher |
| Risk | F17 | B59Higher |
| Tradability | C47 | A89Higher |
| Holdings | D35 | A97Higher |
| Durability | A72 | A93Higher |
Rank among US High Yield funds
Same Category. IFLN and SPHY are both graded against the same 84 US High Yield funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IFLNB
SPHYA
In short
IFLN Junk bonds with a pedigree. IFLN tracks Bloomberg's enhanced fallen-angel index, owning high-yield corporate debt from issuers that were investment grade until the downgrade came, and it charges less than the typical high-yield ETF.
SPHY State Street's junk-bond workhorse: roughly 1,900 US high yield bonds in one wrapper for 0.05% a year, a fraction of what the typical high yield ETF charges, with income paid monthly.
Stated mandate
IFLN The Fund seeks exposure to the Bloomberg US High Yield Enhanced Fallen Angels Index, which represents U.S. dollar-denominated, non-investment-grade corporate bonds. The Fund uses sampling rather than purchasing every index security.
SPHY The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the ICE BofA US High Yield Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IFLN vs SPHY Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IFLN vs SPHY Cost
Overpaying IFLN vs SPHY
$3,699
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IFLN 0.23%
$4,759
SPHY 0.05%
$1,060
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IFLN | SPHY | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $419 | $92 | $327 |
| 20 | $1,630 | $360 | $1,270 |
| 30 | $4,759 | $1,060 | $3,699 |
- 0.23%IFLN
- 0.05%SPHY, cheaper
- Middle half of US High Yield funds
- Median 0.42%
SPHY 2nd cheapest of 84 funds
IFLN 17th cheapest of 84 funds
IFLN vs SPHY Dividends
- IFLN 6.25%
- SPHY 7.37%, better
- IFLN $1.09
- SPHY $1.67
- IFLN $0.09
- SPHY $0.14
- IFLN Oct 19, 2026
- SPHY Oct 1, 2026
- IFLN Oct 23, 2026
- SPHY Oct 6, 2026
- IFLN Monthly
- SPHY Monthly
Distribution history
IFLN vs SPHY Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IFLN SPHY 4.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- IFLN SPHY 0.88
- Worst fall
- IFLN SPHY −15.3%
- Market sensitivity
- IFLN 0.39SPHY 0.64
IFLN and SPHY in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.23% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.23% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.23% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.




