SCYB ranks 1st and IFLN 40th of 84 funds in the US High Yield Category.
IFLN vs SCYB
SCYB −0.20pt a year
0.23%0.03%
SCYB 20.3×the volume
54.5K1.1M
IFLN vs SCYB Performance
−2.2%−1.3%
- IFLN 0.23%
- SCYB 0.03%, better
- IFLN $290M
- SCYB $2.8B
- IFLN
- SCYB +2.0%
- IFLN 6.25%
- SCYB 7.14%, better
- IFLN 120
- SCYB 1844
- IFLN 54.5K sh
- SCYB 1.1M sh, better
- IFLN $17.36
- SCYB $25.22
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IFLN | SCYB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A81 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A79 | A100Higher |
| Risk | F17 | B59Higher |
| Tradability | C47 | A88Higher |
| Holdings | D35 | A99Higher |
| Durability | A72Higher | B68 |
Rank among US High Yield funds
Same Category. IFLN and SCYB are both graded against the same 84 US High Yield funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IFLNB
SCYBA
In short
IFLN Junk bonds with a pedigree. IFLN tracks Bloomberg's enhanced fallen-angel index, owning high-yield corporate debt from issuers that were investment grade until the downgrade came, and it charges less than the typical high-yield ETF.
SCYB Three basis points for the broad US high-yield corporate market. Schwab undercuts a category where the typical fund charges more than ten times as much, spreading the bet across roughly 1,800 bonds and paying monthly.
Stated mandate
IFLN The Fund seeks exposure to the Bloomberg US High Yield Enhanced Fallen Angels Index, which represents U.S. dollar-denominated, non-investment-grade corporate bonds. The Fund uses sampling rather than purchasing every index security.
SCYB The fund follows a rules-based strategy intended to track the high-yield bond market, primarily through bonds in the Bloomberg Barclays US Corporate High Yield Total Return Index and similar derivatives.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IFLN vs SCYB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IFLN vs SCYB Cost
Overpaying IFLN vs SCYB
$4,121
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IFLN 0.23%
$4,759
SCYB 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IFLN | SCYB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $419 | $55 | $364 |
| 20 | $1,630 | $216 | $1,414 |
| 30 | $4,759 | $638 | $4,121 |
- 0.23%IFLN
- 0.03%SCYB, cheaper
- Middle half of US High Yield funds
- Median 0.42%
SCYB cheapest of 84 funds
IFLN 17th cheapest of 84 funds
IFLN vs SCYB Dividends
- IFLN 6.25%
- SCYB 7.14%, better
- IFLN $1.09
- SCYB $1.80
- IFLN $0.09
- SCYB $0.16
- IFLN Oct 19, 2026
- SCYB Oct 1, 2026
- IFLN Oct 23, 2026
- SCYB Oct 7, 2026
- IFLN Monthly
- SCYB Monthly
Distribution history
IFLN vs SCYB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IFLN SCYB 4.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- IFLN SCYB 0.82
- Worst fall
- IFLN SCYB −4.9%
- Market sensitivity
- IFLN 0.39SCYB 0.28
IFLN and SCYB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.23% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.23% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.23% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
