QFLR ranks 3rd and IFLR 4th of 5 funds in the Managed Floor Category.
IFLR vs QFLR
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.89%0.89%
QFLR 6.0×the volume
10.6K63.5K
IFLR vs QFLR Performance
+5.0%−3.2%
- IFLR 0.89%
- QFLR 0.89%
- IFLR $99M
- QFLR $493M
- IFLR
- QFLR −3.6%
- IFLR
- QFLR 0.00%
- IFLR 351
- QFLR 50
- IFLR 10.6K sh
- QFLR 63.5K sh, better
- IFLR $52.24
- QFLR $34.59
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IFLR | QFLR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F24 | F24 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C54Higher | D38 |
| Tradability | C42 | A76Higher |
| Holdings | A72Higher | C50 |
| Durability | C54 | A78Higher |
Rank among Managed Floor funds
Same Category. IFLR and QFLR are both graded against the same 5 Managed Floor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IFLRC
QFLRC
In short
IFLR Innovator's managed-floor engine, pointed overseas for the first time: a basket of developed-market stocks wrapped in a laddered put overlay that aims to hold annual losses near 8-12%.
QFLR Most Nasdaq-100 downside plays lock you into a 12-month outcome period with a reset date. QFLR skips the calendar: about 50 large-cap stocks with a ladder of put options underneath, run by a manager rather than a fixed series.
Stated mandate
IFLR The Fund seeks capital appreciation from international developed equities while limiting potential maximum losses through an actively managed, laddered options overlay.
QFLR The Fund seeks capital appreciation through participation in U.S. large-capitalization companies represented by the Nasdaq-100 Index while limiting potential maximum losses. It uses a hedging strategy with laddered put options and short-dated call sales.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IFLR vs QFLR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IFLR vs QFLR Cost
Same expense ratio
$16,872
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IFLR 0.89%
$16,872
QFLR 0.89%
$16,872
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IFLR | QFLR |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,576 | $1,576 |
| 20 | $5,953 | $5,953 |
| 30 | $16,872 | $16,872 |
- 0.89%IFLR
- 0.89%QFLR
- Middle half of Managed Floor funds
- Median 0.89%
IFLR 3rd cheapest of 5 funds
QFLR 3rd cheapest of 5 funds
IFLR vs QFLR Dividends
- IFLR
- QFLR 0.00%
- IFLR
- QFLR None
- IFLR $0.10
- QFLR
- IFLR Sep 30, 2026
- QFLR
- IFLR Oct 2, 2026
- QFLR
- IFLR Quarterly
- QFLR
Distribution history
IFLR vs QFLR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IFLR QFLR 10.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- IFLR QFLR 0.80
- Worst fall
- IFLR QFLR −14.0%
- Market sensitivity
- IFLR 0.45QFLR 0.74
Popular comparisons
- 0.89% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.70%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.70%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.