Skip to content
etf.net

IFLR vs TRIO

Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF

IFLRCNYSE Arca

MC Trio Equity Buffered ETF

TRIOCCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

TRIO −0.19pt a year

IFLR0.89%TRIO0.70%

Avg volume · 30D

IFLR 7.3×the volume

IFLR10.6KTRIO1.46K

IFLR vs TRIO Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Nov 5, 2026

+5.0%IFLR+5.6%TRIO

Dec 31, 2025 to Nov 5, 2026. IFLR +5.0%. TRIO +5.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2.5%0%2.5%7.5%10%Dec 2025Jun 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
IFLR 0.89%
TRIO 0.70%, better
Fund size
IFLR $99M
TRIO $121M
1Y total return
IFLR No data
TRIO +7.3%
Holdings
IFLR 351
TRIO 7
Avg volume (30D)
IFLR 10.6K sh, better
TRIO 1.46K sh
NAV per share
IFLR $52.24
TRIO $64.58
52W range

ETF.net Grade

IFLR: Cost 24, Risk 54, Mission not scored, Tradability 42, Holdings 72, Durability 54. TRIO: Cost 66, Risk 30, Mission not scored, Tradability 38, Holdings not scored, Durability 48.
Pillar letters and Scores for IFLR, TRIO, with each pillar’s weight
PillarIFLRTRIO
Cost30% weightF24B66Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC54HigherD30
Tradability15% weightC42HigherD38
Holdings10% weightA72Not scored
Durability5% weightC54HigherC48

Rank among Managed Floor funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. IFLR and TRIO are both graded against the same 5 Managed Floor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Managed Floor⁠

Category · 5 funds
See all 5 ›

TRIO ranks 2nd and IFLR 4th of 5 funds in the Managed Floor Category.

  1. Rank 1CSFLRInnovator Equity Managed Floor ETFScore 51
  2. Rank 2CTRIOMC Trio Equity Buffered ETFScore 49
  3. Rank 3CQFLRInnovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETFScore 44
  4. Rank 4CIFLRInnovator International Developed Managed Floor ETFScore 41
  5. Rank 5CMAUGPacer Swan SOS Moderate (August) ETFScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

IFLRCInnovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF

TRIOCMC Trio Equity Buffered ETF

In short

IFLR Innovator's managed-floor engine, pointed overseas for the first time: a basket of developed-market stocks wrapped in a laddered put overlay that aims to hold annual losses near 8-12%.

TRIO No data

Stated mandate

IFLR The Fund seeks capital appreciation from international developed equities while limiting potential maximum losses through an actively managed, laddered options overlay.

TRIO No data

Why people hold it

  • IFLR The first time Innovator has run its Managed Floor strategy outside US equities, with Parametric handling the options work.globenewswire.cominnovatoretfs.com
  • Targets 70-80% participation in developed-market upside while aiming to limit annual losses to roughly 8-12%, before fees and expenses.globenewswire.com
  • The options are laddered rather than locked to a single outcome period, so there is no start date to time. The floor rolls forward instead of resetting on a calendar.innovatoretfs.com
  • Owns the stocks themselves, roughly 300 of them, sampled against the MSCI EAFE Index rather than stacked on top of other funds.

TRIO No data

Worth knowing

  • IFLR 0.89% a year, matching the median for floor funds. That fee buys the overlay and the active management, not the index exposure underneath it.
  • Calls get sold to help pay for the puts, which is why participation is partial. A strong overseas rally is only partly yours.globenewswire.com
  • Launched in late 2025 and thinly traded so far, so spreads can be wide and there is little live history to judge the floor across a full cycle.

TRIO No data

Full IFLR profile⁠

Full TRIO profile⁠

IFLR vs TRIO Holdings

How IFLR and TRIO differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Countryby domicile15.9%
  • Sector11 Sectors76.1%
  • Asset classStocks100%

Sector

Sector weights in IFLR and TRIO, widest gap first
SectorMore in IFLRMore in TRIOGap
TechnologyTRIO +18.5 points
FinancialsIFLR +9.1 points
IndustrialsIFLR +6.6 points
MaterialsIFLR +3.9 points
Consumer StaplesIFLR +2.6 points
CommunicationTRIO +2.5 points
UtilitiesIFLR +1.4 points
Consumer DiscretionaryTRIO +1.0 points
Real EstateTRIO +0.9 points
Health CareTRIO +1.0 points
EnergyIFLR +0.3 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in IFLR and TRIO, widest gap first
CountryMore in IFLRMore in TRIOGap
United StatesTRIO +84.0 points
JapanIFLR +22.7 points
United KingdomIFLR +11.2 points
SwitzerlandIFLR +7.9 points
GermanyIFLR +7.1 points
FranceIFLR +6.6 points
AustraliaIFLR +6.0 points
NetherlandsIFLR +3.9 points
Other countries (20)IFLR +18.5 points

Outside the US: IFLR 98% developed, 2% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • IFLR15.7%
  • TRIO102.7%

Securities held

  • IFLR344
  • TRIO7

Asset class

IFLR
Stocks
TRIO
Stocks

Holdings

  • Only in IFLR344
  • In both0
  • Only in TRIO7

Only in IFLR

344 securities, 100% of IFLR by weight

  • ASML Holding NV2.63%
  • Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/20371.76%
  • Roche Holding AG1.62%

Only in TRIO

7 securities, 100% of TRIO by weight

  • Spy 06/17/2027 7.5 C68.62%
  • Iwm 12/18/2026 2.52 C15.61%
  • Efa 06/17/2027 1.09 C14.18%

Weight gaps

IFLR and TRIO share no securities.

All 356 IFLR holdings⁠All TRIO holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

IFLR vs TRIO Cost

Overpaying IFLR vs TRIO

$3,266

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • IFLR 0.89%

    $16,872

  • TRIO 0.70%

    $13,606

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • IFLR 0.89%
  • TRIO 0.70%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530IFLR $16,872TRIO $13,606

Year by year

YearIFLRTRIOOverpaying
10$1,576$1,250$326
20$5,953$4,760$1,193
30$16,872$13,606$3,266

Expense ratio

  • 0.89%IFLR
  • 0.70%TRIO, cheaper
  • Middle half of Managed Floor funds
  • Median 0.89%

TRIO 2nd cheapest of 5 funds

IFLR 3rd cheapest of 5 funds

IFLR vs TRIO Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 5, 2026
Last payment
IFLR $0.10
TRIO $5.50
Ex-dividend
IFLR Sep 30, 2026
TRIO Dec 23, 2025
Paid on
IFLR Oct 2, 2026
TRIO Dec 24, 2025
Frequency
IFLR Quarterly
TRIO Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

IFLRQuarterly · 3 paymentsAll IFLR payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Mar 31, 2026 $0.15; Jun 30, 2026 $0.35; Sep 30, 2026 $0.10. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$52026YTD
TRIOIrregular · 1 paymentAll TRIO payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 23, 2025 $5.50. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$52026YTD

IFLR vs TRIO Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
IFLR No dataTRIO 5.6%since Apr 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
IFLR No dataTRIO 1.47since Apr 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
IFLR No dataTRIO −9.9%since Mar 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
IFLR 0.45TRIO 0.52

Popular comparisons

  • IFLRCvsSFLRC

    Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF · Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • TRIOCvsSFLRC

    MC Trio Equity Buffered ETF · Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • IFLRCvsQFLRC

    Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF · Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • TRIOCvsQFLRC

    MC Trio Equity Buffered ETF · Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • IFLRCvsMAUGC

    Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (August) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • TRIOCvsMAUGC

    MC Trio Equity Buffered ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (August) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.