IFRA ranks 1st of 33 funds in the Infrastructure Category.
IFRA vs MLPA
IFRA −0.47pt a year
0.30%0.77%
IFRA 1.9×the volume
398K209K
MLPA +4.0pt
+12.1%+16.1%
IFRA vs MLPA Performance
+76.8%+110.9%
- IFRA 0.30%, better
- MLPA 0.77%
- IFRA $4.07B
- MLPA $2.44B
- IFRA +13.4%
- MLPA +22.1%, better
- IFRA 1.73%
- MLPA 7.40%, better
- IFRA 165
- MLPA 20
- IFRA 398K sh, better
- MLPA 209K sh
- IFRA $58.33
- MLPA $55.42
ETF.net Grade
- —MLPAUnder classification review
| Pillar | IFRA | MLPA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100 | |
| Mission | A83 | |
| Risk | B55 | |
| Tradability | A95 | |
| Holdings | A82 | |
| Durability | A81 |
Rank among Infrastructure funds
Our read on each fund
IFRAA
MLPA—
In short
IFRA Most infrastructure funds pick a side: the companies that build the stuff, or the ones that own it. IFRA holds both, stays entirely American, and charges well under the category's typical fee.
Stated mandate
IFRA The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. companies with infrastructure exposure, balancing infrastructure enablers and infrastructure asset owners.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IFRA vs MLPA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IFRA vs MLPA Cost
Overpaying MLPA vs IFRA
$8,680
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IFRA 0.30%
$6,149
MLPA 0.77%
$14,829
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IFRA | MLPA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $545 | $1,371 | $826 |
| 20 | $2,113 | $5,205 | $3,092 |
| 30 | $6,149 | $14,829 | $8,680 |
- 0.30%IFRA, cheaper
- 0.77%MLPA
- Middle half of Infrastructure funds
- Median 0.55%
IFRA cheapest of 33 funds
MLPA 26th cheapest of 33 funds
IFRA vs MLPA Dividends
- IFRA 1.73%
- MLPA 7.40%, better
- IFRA $1.02
- MLPA $4.02
- IFRA $0.26
- MLPA $1.02
- IFRA Sep 15, 2026
- MLPA Aug 10, 2026
- IFRA Sep 18, 2026
- MLPA Aug 13, 2026
- IFRA Quarterly
- MLPA Quarterly
Distribution history
IFRA vs MLPA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- IFRA
- MLPA
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IFRA 17.2%MLPA 14.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- IFRA 0.92, betterMLPA 0.82
- Worst fall
- IFRA −19.9%MLPA −18.8%, better
- Market sensitivity
- IFRA 0.96MLPA 0.23
IFRA and MLPA in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.30% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


