IGF ranks 2nd of 33 funds in the Infrastructure Category.
IGF vs MLPA
0.0%by weight
IGF −0.40pt a year
0.37%0.77%
IGF 4.2×the volume
874K209K
IGF +1.7pt
+8.4%+6.7%
IGF vs MLPA Performance
+59.2%+110.9%
- IGF 0.37%, better
- MLPA 0.77%
- IGF $10.9B
- MLPA $2.44B
- IGF +11.2%
- MLPA +22.1%, better
- IGF 2.93%
- MLPA 7.40%, better
- IGF 89
- MLPA 20
- IGF 874K sh, better
- MLPA 209K sh
- IGF $65.84
- MLPA $55.42
ETF.net Grade
- —MLPAUnder classification review
| Pillar | IGF | MLPA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A92 | |
| Mission | A85 | |
| Risk | A72 | |
| Tradability | A83 | |
| Holdings | A72 | |
| Durability | A92 |
Rank among Infrastructure funds
Our read on each fund
IGFA
MLPA—
In short
IGF About 80 developed-market infrastructure companies in one ticker, tracked against the S&P Global Infrastructure Index since 2007, for 0.37% a year (well under the category norm).
Stated mandate
IGF The Fund seeks to track an index of developed-market equities focused on the infrastructure industry.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IGF vs MLPA Holdings
How IGF and MLPA differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 2.0% of IGF and 0.0% of MLPA.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
- Sector23.2%
- Country38.5%
Sector
| Sector | More in IGFMore in MLPA | IGF | MLPA |
|---|---|---|---|
| Energy | MLPA +76.8 points | 20.4% | 97.2% |
| Transportation | IGF +39.3 points | 39.3% | 0.0% |
| Utilities | IGF +37.5 points | 40.4% | 2.9% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in IGFMore in MLPA | IGF | MLPA |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | MLPA +61.5 points | 38.5% | 100.0% |
| Spain | IGF +9.2 points | 9.2% | 0.0% |
| Canada | IGF +8.0 points | 8.0% | 0.0% |
| Mexico | IGF +7.5 points | 7.5% | 0.0% |
| France | IGF +6.8 points | 6.8% | 0.0% |
| Australia | IGF +6.4 points | 6.4% | 0.0% |
| China | IGF +4.8 points | 4.8% | 0.0% |
| United Kingdom | IGF +3.6 points | 3.6% | 0.0% |
| Other countries (6) | IGF +15.2 points | 15.2% | 0.0% |
Outside the US: IGF 80% developed, 20% emerging.
Concentration
- IGF38.6%
- MLPA98.4%
- IGF75
- MLPA19
Asset class
- IGF
- Equity
- MLPA
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in IGF74
- In both1
- Only in MLPA18
Only in IGF
74 securities, 97.8% of IGF by weight
- Transurban Group Stapled Units4.92%
- Aena Sme SA4.89%
- Nextera Energy4.80%
- Iberdrola4.08%
- Grupo Aeroportuario Del Pacifico A4.02%
- Enbridge3.61%
- Auckland International Airport3.45%
- Williams2.99%
- Southern2.96%
- Getlink2.85%
- Duke Energy Corp2.73%
- Constellation Energy Corp2.37%
- National Grid PLC2.32%
- Cheniere Energy2.24%
- Targa Resources2.22%
- Tc Energy2.21%
- Kinder Morgan2.18%
- Enel2.15%
- Aeroports De Paris SA2.13%
- Flughafen Zuerich AG2.01%
- American Electric Power Inc1.95%
- Grupo Aeroportuario Adr Representi1.84%
- Dominion Energy1.61%
- Grupo Aeroportuario Del Centro Nor1.55%
- Sempra1.55%
- Japan Airport Terminal1.46%
- Entergy Corp1.41%
- Xcel Energy Inc1.37%
- Engie SA1.35%
- Exelon Corp1.31%
- E.on N1.29%
- Rwe AG1.21%
- Vistra1.20%
- Consolidated Edison1.18%
- Sse PLC1.17%
- Sats Ltd1.10%
- China Merchants Port Holdings Ltd1.07%
- Public Service Enterprise Group1.02%
- Pembina Pipeline0.98%
- Fraport AG0.96%
- Dalrymple Bay Infrastructure Stapl0.83%
- Jiangsu Expressway Ltd H0.74%
- Enav Spa0.62%
- Zhejiang Expressway Ltd H0.55%
- Atlas Arteria Stapled Units0.52%
- Athens International Airport0.50%
- Hutchison Port Holdings Units Trus0.44%
- Westshore Terminals Investment0.43%
- Dt Midstream0.42%
- Cosco Shipping Ports Ltd0.40%
Only in MLPA
18 securities, 100% of MLPA by weight
- Energy Transfer Lp15.40%
- Enterprise Products Partners13.59%
- Mplx Lp12.88%
- Plains All Amer Pipeline Lp12.45%
- Western Midstream Partners L10.04%
- Sunoco Lp8.78%
- Hess Midstream Lp - Class A7.59%
- Cheniere Energy Partners Lp7.51%
- Usa Compression Partners Lp5.65%
- Genesis Energy L.p.4.49%
- Global Partners Lp3.95%
- Suburban Propane Partners Lp3.24%
- Delek Logistics Partners Lp3.02%
- Summit Midstream Corp<0.01%
- Crossamerica Partners Lp<0.01%
- Ngl Energy Partners Lp<0.01%
- Star Group Lp<0.01%
- Martin Midstream Partners Lp0.00%
Weight gaps
All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in IGFMore in MLPA | IGF | MLPA |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oneok | IGF +2.01 points | 2.01% | <0.01% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IGF vs MLPA Cost
Overpaying MLPA vs IGF
$7,316
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IGF 0.37%
$7,513
MLPA 0.77%
$14,829
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IGF | MLPA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $670 | $1,371 | $701 |
| 20 | $2,590 | $5,205 | $2,615 |
| 30 | $7,513 | $14,829 | $7,316 |
- 0.37%IGF, cheaper
- 0.77%MLPA
- Middle half of Infrastructure funds
- Median 0.55%
IGF 3rd cheapest of 33 funds
MLPA 26th cheapest of 33 funds
IGF vs MLPA Dividends
- IGF 2.93%
- MLPA 7.40%, better
- IGF $1.93
- MLPA $4.02
- IGF $0.93
- MLPA $1.02
- IGF Jun 15, 2026
- MLPA Aug 10, 2026
- IGF Jun 18, 2026
- MLPA Aug 13, 2026
- IGF Twice a year
- MLPA Quarterly
Distribution history
IGF vs MLPA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- IGF
- MLPA
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IGF 12.4%, betterMLPA 14.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- IGF 1.18, betterMLPA 0.82
- Worst fall
- IGF −20.8%MLPA −18.8%, better
- Market sensitivity
- IGF 0.62MLPA 0.23
IGF and MLPA in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.37% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.37% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.37% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.



