IGE ranks 1st and NANR 2nd of 14 funds in the Natural Resources Category.
IGE vs NANR
NANR −0.02pt a year
0.37%0.35%
IGE 5.0×the volume
144K28.5K
NANR +2.6pt
+10.4%+13.0%
IGE vs NANR Performance
+137.4%+123.4%
- IGE 0.37%
- NANR 0.35%, better
- IGE $839M
- NANR $840M
- IGE +42.6%, better
- NANR +40.2%
- IGE 1.81%, better
- NANR 1.63%
- IGE 153
- NANR 204
- IGE 144K sh, better
- NANR 28.5K sh
- IGE $66.58
- NANR $87.29
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IGE | NANR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A91 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A72 | |
| Risk | B64Higher | C54 |
| Tradability | A85Higher | B65 |
| Holdings | D37 | C53Higher |
| Durability | A79 | A81Higher |
Rank among Natural Resources funds
Same Category. IGE and NANR are both graded against the same 14 Natural Resources funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IGEA
NANRA
In short
IGE A 2001-vintage way to own the stuff the economy digs up and drills for: US and Canadian energy, metals, miners and timber in one market-cap-weighted basket, priced below the natural-resources average.
NANR Natural resources without the passport: roughly 200 large and mid cap US and Canadian energy, mining and agriculture names in one basket, for 0.35% a year.
Stated mandate
IGE The fund seeks to follow an index representing North American equities in the natural-resources sector.
NANR The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the S&P BMI North American Natural Resources Index. It targets large- and mid-cap publicly traded U.S. and Canadian companies in energy, metals and mining, and agriculture-related natural-resources businesses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IGE vs NANR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IGE vs NANR Cost
Overpaying IGE vs NANR
$387
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IGE 0.37%
$7,513
NANR 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IGE | NANR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $670 | $634 | $36 |
| 20 | $2,590 | $2,454 | $136 |
| 30 | $7,513 | $7,126 | $387 |
- 0.37%IGE
- 0.35%NANR, cheaper
- Middle half of Natural Resources funds
- Median 0.46%
NANR cheapest of 14 funds
IGE 2nd cheapest of 14 funds
IGE vs NANR Dividends
- IGE 1.81%, better
- NANR 1.63%
- IGE $1.20
- NANR $1.41
- IGE $0.32
- NANR $0.71
- IGE Sep 15, 2026
- NANR Jun 1, 2026
- IGE Sep 18, 2026
- NANR Jun 3, 2026
- IGE Quarterly
- NANR Twice a year
Distribution history
IGE vs NANR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- IGE
- NANR
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IGE 17.9%, betterNANR 19.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- IGE 0.93NANR 0.95, better
- Worst fall
- IGE −25.7%, betterNANR −26.4%
- Market sensitivity
- IGE 0.30NANR 0.49
Popular comparisons
- 0.37% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.37% · 0.41%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.41%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.37% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.