IGSB ranks 2nd of 23 funds in the Investment Grade Corporate (0-5 Year) Category.
IGSB vs ZTWO
IGSB −0.11pt a year
0.04%0.15%
IGSB 2626.8×the volume
3.64M1.39K
IGSB vs ZTWO Performance
+2.0%+2.5%
- IGSB 0.04%, better
- ZTWO 0.15%
- IGSB $23.8B
- ZTWO $18M
- IGSB +2.0%
- ZTWO +2.5%, better
- IGSB 4.66%, better
- ZTWO 4.57%
- IGSB 4746
- ZTWO 466
- IGSB 3.64M sh, better
- ZTWO 1.39K sh
- IGSB $51.63
- ZTWO $49.96
ETF.net Grade
- —ZTWOUnder classification review
| Pillar | IGSB | ZTWO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A93 | |
| Mission | A71 | |
| Risk | C43 | |
| Tradability | A91 | |
| Holdings | A88 | |
| Durability | A90 |
Rank among Investment Grade Corporate (0-5 Year) funds
Our read on each fund
IGSBA
ZTWO—
In short
IGSB Corporate credit with the rate risk dialed down: roughly 4,700 investment-grade bonds, none maturing past five years, for four basis points. iShares has run it since 2007.
ZTWO Most funds in the target-maturity aisle have an expiration date. ZTWO doesn't: it keeps rolling, always holding investment-grade corporate bonds 1.5 to under 2.5 years from maturity, so the two-year rung never empties.
Stated mandate
IGSB The fund seeks to track an index containing U.S. dollar-denominated investment-grade corporate bonds with remaining maturities from one through five years.
ZTWO The fund is passively managed and seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the ICE 2-Year US Target Maturity Corporate Index. It normally invests at least 80% of net assets in investment-grade corporate bonds with 1.5 to less than 2.5 years remaining to maturity.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IGSB vs ZTWO Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IGSB vs ZTWO Cost
Overpaying ZTWO vs IGSB
$2,288
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IGSB 0.04%
$849
ZTWO 0.15%
$3,137
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IGSB | ZTWO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $73 | $274 | $201 |
| 20 | $288 | $1,071 | $783 |
| 30 | $849 | $3,137 | $2,288 |
- 0.04%IGSB, cheaper
- 0.15%ZTWO
- Middle half of Investment Grade Corporate (0-5 Year) funds
- Median 0.15%
IGSB 3rd cheapest of 23 funds
ZTWO 9th cheapest of 23 funds
IGSB vs ZTWO Dividends
- IGSB 4.66%, better
- ZTWO 4.57%
- IGSB $2.41
- ZTWO $2.28
- IGSB $0.20
- ZTWO $0.19
- IGSB Oct 1, 2026
- ZTWO Oct 27, 2026
- IGSB Oct 6, 2026
- ZTWO Oct 28, 2026
- IGSB Monthly
- ZTWO Monthly
Distribution history
IGSB vs ZTWO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IGSB 2.6%ZTWO 1.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- IGSB 0.47ZTWO −0.08
- Worst fall
- IGSB −9.1%ZTWO −0.9%
- Market sensitivity
- IGSB 0.40ZTWO 0.04
IGSB and ZTWO in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
