SCHJ ranks 4th of 23 funds in the Investment Grade Corporate (0-5 Year) Category.
SCHJ vs ZTWO
SCHJ −0.12pt a year
0.03%0.15%
SCHJ 215.1×the volume
298K1.39K
SCHJ vs ZTWO Performance
+2.0%+2.5%
- SCHJ 0.03%, better
- ZTWO 0.15%
- SCHJ $897M
- ZTWO $18M
- SCHJ +2.0%
- ZTWO +2.5%, better
- SCHJ 4.58%, better
- ZTWO 4.57%
- SCHJ 3342
- ZTWO 466
- SCHJ 298K sh, better
- ZTWO 1.39K sh
- SCHJ $24.31
- ZTWO $49.96
ETF.net Grade
- —ZTWOUnder classification review
| Pillar | SCHJ | ZTWO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A93 | |
| Mission | A71 | |
| Risk | C49 | |
| Tradability | B61 | |
| Holdings | A82 | |
| Durability | C54 |
Rank among Investment Grade Corporate (0-5 Year) funds
Our read on each fund
SCHJA
ZTWO—
In short
SCHJ Short-dated corporate credit at index-fund pricing. SCHJ tracks the Bloomberg US 1-5 Year Corporate Bond Index for 0.03% a year, sits at the bottom of its category's fee table, and pays monthly.
ZTWO Most funds in the target-maturity aisle have an expiration date. ZTWO doesn't: it keeps rolling, always holding investment-grade corporate bonds 1.5 to under 2.5 years from maturity, so the two-year rung never empties.
Stated mandate
SCHJ The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of an index measuring the short-term U.S. corporate bond market.
ZTWO The fund is passively managed and seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the ICE 2-Year US Target Maturity Corporate Index. It normally invests at least 80% of net assets in investment-grade corporate bonds with 1.5 to less than 2.5 years remaining to maturity.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SCHJ vs ZTWO Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SCHJ vs ZTWO Cost
Overpaying ZTWO vs SCHJ
$2,499
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SCHJ 0.03%
$638
ZTWO 0.15%
$3,137
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SCHJ | ZTWO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $55 | $274 | $219 |
| 20 | $216 | $1,071 | $855 |
| 30 | $638 | $3,137 | $2,499 |
- 0.03%SCHJ, cheaper
- 0.15%ZTWO
- Middle half of Investment Grade Corporate (0-5 Year) funds
- Median 0.15%
SCHJ cheapest of 23 funds
ZTWO 9th cheapest of 23 funds
SCHJ vs ZTWO Dividends
- SCHJ 4.58%, better
- ZTWO 4.57%
- SCHJ $1.11
- ZTWO $2.28
- SCHJ $0.09
- ZTWO $0.19
- SCHJ Oct 1, 2026
- ZTWO Oct 27, 2026
- SCHJ Oct 7, 2026
- ZTWO Oct 28, 2026
- SCHJ Monthly
- ZTWO Monthly
Distribution history
SCHJ vs ZTWO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SCHJ 2.6%ZTWO 1.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- SCHJ 0.39ZTWO −0.08
- Worst fall
- SCHJ −8.9%ZTWO −0.9%
- Market sensitivity
- SCHJ 0.41ZTWO 0.04
Popular comparisons
- 0.03% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.