SPSB ranks 1st of 23 funds in the Investment Grade Corporate (0-5 Year) Category.
SPSB vs ZTWO
SPSB −0.11pt a year
0.04%0.15%
SPSB 3620.1×the volume
5.02M1.39K
SPSB vs ZTWO Performance
+2.7%+2.5%
- SPSB 0.04%, better
- ZTWO 0.15%
- SPSB $11.3B
- ZTWO $18M
- SPSB +2.7%, better
- ZTWO +2.5%
- SPSB 4.36%
- ZTWO 4.57%, better
- SPSB 1650
- ZTWO 466
- SPSB 5.02M sh, better
- ZTWO 1.39K sh
- SPSB $29.72
- ZTWO $49.96
ETF.net Grade
- —ZTWOUnder classification review
| Pillar | SPSB | ZTWO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A93 | |
| Mission | A70 | |
| Risk | B63 | |
| Tradability | A95 | |
| Holdings | A73 | |
| Durability | A83 |
Rank among Investment Grade Corporate (0-5 Year) funds
Our read on each fund
SPSBA
ZTWO—
In short
SPSB The short end of the corporate bond market, bought wholesale: roughly 1,600 investment-grade corporate bonds maturing in one to three years, for four basis points. Built as a cash-adjacent building block, not a yield swing.
ZTWO Most funds in the target-maturity aisle have an expiration date. ZTWO doesn't: it keeps rolling, always holding investment-grade corporate bonds 1.5 to under 2.5 years from maturity, so the two-year rung never empties.
Stated mandate
SPSB The fund seeks to track the price and yield performance of the Bloomberg U.S. 1-3 Year Corporate Bond Index before fees and expenses.
ZTWO The fund is passively managed and seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the ICE 2-Year US Target Maturity Corporate Index. It normally invests at least 80% of net assets in investment-grade corporate bonds with 1.5 to less than 2.5 years remaining to maturity.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SPSB vs ZTWO Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SPSB vs ZTWO Cost
Overpaying ZTWO vs SPSB
$2,288
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SPSB 0.04%
$849
ZTWO 0.15%
$3,137
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SPSB | ZTWO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $73 | $274 | $201 |
| 20 | $288 | $1,071 | $783 |
| 30 | $849 | $3,137 | $2,288 |
- 0.04%SPSB, cheaper
- 0.15%ZTWO
- Middle half of Investment Grade Corporate (0-5 Year) funds
- Median 0.15%
SPSB 3rd cheapest of 23 funds
ZTWO 9th cheapest of 23 funds
SPSB vs ZTWO Dividends
- SPSB 4.36%
- ZTWO 4.57%, better
- SPSB $1.30
- ZTWO $2.28
- SPSB $0.11
- ZTWO $0.19
- SPSB Oct 1, 2026
- ZTWO Oct 27, 2026
- SPSB Oct 6, 2026
- ZTWO Oct 28, 2026
- SPSB Monthly
- ZTWO Monthly
Distribution history
SPSB vs ZTWO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SPSB 1.7%ZTWO 1.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- SPSB 0.43ZTWO −0.08
- Worst fall
- SPSB −5.7%ZTWO −0.9%
- Market sensitivity
- SPSB 0.25ZTWO 0.04
SPSB and ZTWO in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

