ILCG ranks 2nd and QMID 32nd of 35 funds in the US Growth Index Category.
ILCG vs QMID
ILCG −0.34pt a year
0.04%0.38%
ILCG 177.4×the volume
70.4K397
ILCG vs QMID Performance
+3.2%+8.3%
- ILCG 0.04%, better
- QMID 0.38%
- ILCG $3B
- QMID $2M
- ILCG +3.2%
- QMID +8.3%, better
- ILCG 0.44%
- QMID 0.48%, better
- ILCG 328
- QMID 125
- ILCG 70.4K sh, better
- QMID 397 sh
- ILCG $109.98
- QMID $30.20
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ILCG | QMID |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A96Higher | D26 |
| Mission | A100Higher | B55 |
| Risk | C44 | B56Higher |
| Tradability | B64Higher | D25 |
| Holdings | C49 | A73Higher |
| Durability | B64Higher | D28 |
Rank among US Growth Index funds
Same Category. ILCG and QMID are both graded against the same 35 US Growth Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ILCGA
QMIDC
In short
ILCG Growth by Morningstar's rulebook. A 2004-vintage iShares fund that screens large and mid caps for above-average earnings, sales, cash-flow and book-value growth, and charges four basis points to do it.
QMID Plenty of mid-cap growth funds buy growth and hope profits follow. QMID ranks mid-caps on both, blending earnings and sales growth with return on equity and assets, then keeps only the top-scoring 30% and bars real estate, utilities and banks outright.
Stated mandate
ILCG The fund aims to follow an index of U.S. large- and mid-cap stocks chosen for above-average earnings, sales, cash-flow, and book-value growth.
QMID QMID seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Index. It uses passive indexing and generally representative sampling to pursue that objective.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ILCG vs QMID Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ILCG vs QMID Cost
Overpaying QMID vs ILCG
$6,857
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ILCG 0.04%
$849
QMID 0.38%
$7,706
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ILCG | QMID | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $73 | $688 | $615 |
| 20 | $288 | $2,658 | $2,370 |
| 30 | $849 | $7,706 | $6,857 |
- 0.04%ILCG, cheaper
- 0.38%QMID
- Middle half of US Growth Index funds
- Median 0.18%
ILCG 2nd cheapest of 35 funds
QMID 26th cheapest of 35 funds
ILCG vs QMID Dividends
- ILCG 0.44%
- QMID 0.48%, better
- ILCG $0.48
- QMID $0.15
- ILCG $0.14
- QMID $0.15
- ILCG Sep 15, 2026
- QMID Dec 26, 2025
- ILCG Sep 18, 2026
- QMID Dec 30, 2025
- ILCG Quarterly
- QMID Annual
Distribution history
ILCG vs QMID Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ILCG 17.8%QMID 14.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- ILCG 1.06QMID 0.30
- Worst fall
- ILCG −35.4%QMID −24.4%
- Market sensitivity
- ILCG 1.23QMID 0.94
Popular comparisons
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.38% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.38% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.38% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
