ILCG ranks 2nd and SFY 8th of 35 funds in the US Growth Index Category.
ILCG vs SFY
ILCG −0.01pt a year
0.04%0.05%
ILCG 4.8×the volume
70.4K14.8K
SFY +3.1pt
+9.8%+12.9%
ILCG vs SFY Performance
+59.5%+83.6%
- ILCG 0.04%, better
- SFY 0.05%
- ILCG $3B
- SFY $684M
- ILCG +3.2%
- SFY +11.9%, better
- ILCG 0.44%
- SFY 0.84%, better
- ILCG 328
- SFY 501
- ILCG 70.4K sh, better
- SFY 14.8K sh
- ILCG $109.98
- SFY $148.65
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ILCG | SFY |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A96Higher | A78 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A84 |
| Risk | C44 | A74Higher |
| Tradability | B64Higher | C41 |
| Holdings | C49 | B57Higher |
| Durability | B64Higher | C42 |
Rank among US Growth Index funds
Same Category. ILCG and SFY are both graded against the same 35 US Growth Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ILCGA
SFYA
In short
ILCG Growth by Morningstar's rulebook. A 2004-vintage iShares fund that screens large and mid caps for above-average earnings, sales, cash-flow and book-value growth, and charges four basis points to do it.
SFY SoFi's house-brand large-cap fund: 500 big US companies, but growth signals decide how much weight each one gets instead of size alone. Five basis points, from a fintech app rather than a legacy fund complex.
Stated mandate
ILCG The fund aims to follow an index of U.S. large- and mid-cap stocks chosen for above-average earnings, sales, cash-flow, and book-value growth.
SFY The fund seeks to track the Solactive SoFi US 500 Growth Index. It provides exposure to 500 large U.S. companies while using growth signals to determine each company's contribution.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ILCG vs SFY Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ILCG vs SFY Cost
Overpaying SFY vs ILCG
$211
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ILCG 0.04%
$849
SFY 0.05%
$1,060
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ILCG | SFY | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $73 | $92 | $19 |
| 20 | $288 | $360 | $72 |
| 30 | $849 | $1,060 | $211 |
- 0.04%ILCG, cheaper
- 0.05%SFY
- Middle half of US Growth Index funds
- Median 0.18%
ILCG 2nd cheapest of 35 funds
SFY 5th cheapest of 35 funds
ILCG vs SFY Dividends
- ILCG 0.44%
- SFY 0.84%, better
- ILCG $0.48
- SFY $1.25
- ILCG $0.14
- SFY $0.63
- ILCG Sep 15, 2026
- SFY Jun 29, 2026
- ILCG Sep 18, 2026
- SFY Jun 30, 2026
- ILCG Quarterly
- SFY Twice a year
Distribution history
ILCG vs SFY Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ILCG
- SFY
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ILCG 17.8%SFY 14.8%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- ILCG 1.06SFY 1.43, better
- Worst fall
- ILCG −35.4%SFY −27.7%, better
- Market sensitivity
- ILCG 1.23SFY 1.10
Popular comparisons
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
