ILCG ranks 2nd and VOT 7th of 35 funds in the US Growth Index Category.
ILCG vs VOT
ILCG −0.01pt a year
0.04%0.05%
VOT 2.9×the volume
70.4K204K
ILCG +5.7pt
+17.3%+11.6%
ILCG vs VOT Performance
+59.5%+15.5%
- ILCG 0.04%, better
- VOT 0.05%
- ILCG $3B
- VOT $33.2B
- ILCG +3.2%, better
- VOT −1.2%
- ILCG 0.44%
- VOT 0.62%, better
- ILCG 328
- VOT 123
- ILCG 70.4K sh
- VOT 204K sh, better
- ILCG $109.98
- VOT $286.95
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ILCG | VOT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A96Higher | A78 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A97 |
| Risk | C44 | C49Higher |
| Tradability | B64Higher | D39 |
| Holdings | C49 | A72Higher |
| Durability | B64 | A79Higher |
Rank among US Growth Index funds
Same Category. ILCG and VOT are both graded against the same 35 US Growth Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ILCGA
VOTA
In short
ILCG Growth by Morningstar's rulebook. A 2004-vintage iShares fund that screens large and mid caps for above-average earnings, sales, cash-flow and book-value growth, and charges four basis points to do it.
VOT Mid-caps are the market's forgotten middle: too big for small-cap funds, too small for the S&P 500. VOT buys the growth half of that gap for five basis points, a fraction of what the typical factor fund charges.
Stated mandate
ILCG The fund aims to follow an index of U.S. large- and mid-cap stocks chosen for above-average earnings, sales, cash-flow, and book-value growth.
VOT The ETF is designed to follow the CRSP US Mid Cap Growth Index, a passive benchmark for U.S. mid-capitalization growth companies.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ILCG vs VOT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ILCG vs VOT Cost
Overpaying VOT vs ILCG
$211
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ILCG 0.04%
$849
VOT 0.05%
$1,060
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ILCG | VOT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $73 | $92 | $19 |
| 20 | $288 | $360 | $72 |
| 30 | $849 | $1,060 | $211 |
- 0.04%ILCG, cheaper
- 0.05%VOT
- Middle half of US Growth Index funds
- Median 0.18%
ILCG 2nd cheapest of 35 funds
VOT 5th cheapest of 35 funds
ILCG vs VOT Dividends
- ILCG 0.44%
- VOT 0.62%, better
- ILCG $0.48
- VOT $1.78
- ILCG $0.14
- VOT $0.39
- ILCG Sep 15, 2026
- VOT Sep 28, 2026
- ILCG Sep 18, 2026
- VOT Sep 30, 2026
- ILCG Quarterly
- VOT Quarterly
Distribution history
ILCG vs VOT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ILCG
- VOT
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ILCG 17.8%VOT 16.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- ILCG 1.06, betterVOT 0.75
- Worst fall
- ILCG −35.4%, betterVOT −37.2%
- Market sensitivity
- ILCG 1.23VOT 1.16
ILCG and VOT in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
