ILCV ranks 2nd and MOAT 53rd of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
ILCV vs MOAT
ILCV −0.42pt a year
0.04%0.46%
MOAT 21.5×the volume
24.4K524K
MOAT +2.1pt
+12.3%+14.4%
ILCV vs MOAT Performance
+81.1%+56.9%
- ILCV 0.04%, better
- MOAT 0.46%
- ILCV $1.37B
- MOAT $11.8B
- ILCV +21.0%, better
- MOAT +12.0%
- ILCV 1.51%, better
- MOAT 1.25%
- ILCV 375
- MOAT 56
- ILCV 24.4K sh
- MOAT 524K sh, better
- ILCV $109.27
- MOAT $112.36
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ILCV | MOAT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A99Higher | D28 |
| Mission | A82Higher | B69 |
| Risk | A90Higher | D31 |
| Tradability | B64 | A96Higher |
| Holdings | D39 | C44Higher |
| Durability | A82 | A83Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. ILCV and MOAT are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ILCVA
MOATC
In short
ILCV Value done the thorough way: roughly 400 large- and mid-cap US stocks screened on five separate value measures, not just cheap book value. Running since 2004 at four basis points, it's one of the cheapest tickets into the value factor.
MOAT Analyst judgment, not just a formula. MOAT holds about 60 US companies that Morningstar's equity research flags as having durable competitive advantages, and it only buys the ones the research also calls attractively priced.
Stated mandate
ILCV The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. large- and mid-cap stocks selected with value-oriented measures including forward earnings, book value, sales, cash flow, and dividend yield.
MOAT MOAT seeks to replicate the price and yield performance of the Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index, which targets attractively priced companies with sustainable competitive advantages identified through Morningstar equity research.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ILCV vs MOAT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ILCV vs MOAT Cost
Overpaying MOAT vs ILCV
$8,381
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ILCV 0.04%
$849
MOAT 0.46%
$9,230
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ILCV | MOAT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $73 | $830 | $757 |
| 20 | $288 | $3,195 | $2,907 |
| 30 | $849 | $9,230 | $8,381 |
- 0.04%ILCV, cheaper
- 0.46%MOAT
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
ILCV cheapest of 99 funds
MOAT 72nd cheapest of 99 funds
ILCV vs MOAT Dividends
- ILCV 1.51%, better
- MOAT 1.25%
- ILCV $1.65
- MOAT $1.40
- ILCV $0.42
- MOAT $1.40
- ILCV Sep 15, 2026
- MOAT Dec 22, 2025
- ILCV Sep 18, 2026
- MOAT Dec 26, 2025
- ILCV Quarterly
- MOAT Annual
Distribution history
ILCV vs MOAT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ILCV
- MOAT
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ILCV 10.7%, betterMOAT 14.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- ILCV 1.57, betterMOAT 0.86
- Worst fall
- ILCV −18.6%, betterMOAT −23.9%
- Market sensitivity
- ILCV 0.82MOAT 0.92
ILCV and MOAT in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.46% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.46% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.46% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

