Skip to content

MOAT vs VYM

VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF

MOATCCboe

Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF

VYMANYSE Arca

Overlap

8.3%by weight

Expense ratio

VYM −0.42pt a year

MOAT0.46%VYM0.04%

Avg volume · 30D

VYM 2.2×the volume

MOAT524KVYM1.14M

10Y return · a year

MOAT +2.4pt

MOAT+14.4%VYM+12.0%

MOAT vs VYM Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+56.9%MOAT+74.3%VYM

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. MOAT +56.9%. VYM +74.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%40%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
MOAT 0.46%
VYM 0.04%, better
Fund size
MOAT $11.8B
VYM $95.8B
1Y total return
MOAT +12.0%
VYM +19.3%, better
Yield (12M)
MOAT 1.25%
VYM 2.24%, better
Holdings
MOAT 56
VYM 601
Avg volume (30D)
MOAT 524K sh
VYM 1.14M sh, better
NAV per share
MOAT $112.36
VYM $163.75
52W range

ETF.net Grade

MOAT: Cost 28, Risk 31, Mission 69, Tradability 96, Holdings 44, Durability 83. VYM: Cost 99, Risk 84, Mission 79, Tradability 61, Holdings 53, Durability 95.
Pillar letters and Scores for MOAT, VYM, with each pillar’s weight
PillarMOATVYM
Cost30% weightD28A99Higher
Mission25% weightB69A79Higher
Risk15% weightD31A84Higher
Tradability15% weightA96HigherB61
Holdings10% weightC44C53Higher
Durability5% weightA83A95Higher

Rank among US Multifactor funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. MOAT and VYM are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Multifactor⁠

Category · 99 funds
See all 99 ›

VYM ranks 2nd and MOAT 53rd of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.

  1. Rank 1AVONVVanguard Russell 1000 Value ETFScore 85
  2. Rank 2AILCViShares Morningstar Value ETFScore 81
  3. Rank 2AVYMVanguard High Dividend Yield ETFScore 81
  4. Rank 4AIMCViShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETFScore 80
  5. Rank 53CFTCSFirst Trust Capital Strength ETFScore 53
  6. Rank 53CMOATVanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETFScore 53
  7. Rank 53BSEUSSEI QiM U.S. Equity Factor Allocation Active ETFScore 53

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

MOATCVanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF

VYMAVanguard High Dividend Yield ETF

In short

MOAT Analyst judgment, not just a formula. MOAT holds about 60 US companies that Morningstar's equity research flags as having durable competitive advantages, and it only buys the ones the research also calls attractively priced.

VYM The no-frills dividend workhorse. VYM buys the higher-yielding end of the US market, roughly 600 names, for four basis points: no quality screen, no dividend-growth-streak test, just yield, at scale since 2006.

Stated mandate

MOAT MOAT seeks to replicate the price and yield performance of the Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index, which targets attractively priced companies with sustainable competitive advantages identified through Morningstar equity research.

VYM The Fund seeks to track a benchmark index measuring the investment return of common stocks from companies characterized by high dividend yields.

Why people hold it

  • MOAT Two gates, not one: a company needs a sustainable competitive advantage from Morningstar's research and an attractive price. Quality alone doesn't earn a slot.
  • Running since 2012 and now a multi-billion-dollar fund, so the strategy has been through several full market cycles with real money behind it.
  • Actively traded and among the easier funds in its multifactor peer group to move in and out of at tight spreads.
  • Sticks to its stated job: a US equity index fund built on the quality-plus-value screen it advertises, sitting in the upper half of a 100-plus fund cohort.
  • VYM Four basis points a year, against a peer-group median near 0.32%. Cheaper than cohort neighbors VONV (0.06%) and FNDX (0.25%).
  • Running since 2006 and now a multi-billion-dollar fund that trades actively, so ordinary orders tend to fill at tight spreads.
  • Simple mandate: track the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index of US common stocks screened on yield. No manager discretion, no options overlay, plain 1940-Act fund.vanguard.com
  • Pays quarterly, and among 100-plus value and multifactor rivals it stands as one of the strongest overall packages in the group.

Worth knowing

  • MOAT 0.46% a year is real money next to plain value beta: VONV charges 0.06% and VYM 0.04%. Analyst-driven research carries a price tag.
  • About 60 names, chosen on valuation. That is a portfolio built to look different from the broad market, in both directions.
  • Distributions come annually or semiannually, so it isn't built as a regular income stream.
  • VYM The screen is yield, not payout growth or dividend quality, so a company can qualify simply because its share price fell.
  • This is a value slice by design, tilted to established payers, so it behaves differently from a total US market fund.
  • Roughly 600 holdings, but weight leans toward the largest payers, so the top of the roster does more of the work than the count suggests.

Full MOAT profile⁠

Full VYM profile⁠

MOAT vs VYM Holdings

How MOAT and VYM differ

Overlap by weight

8.3%

Shared holdings make up 51.9% of MOAT and 13.1% of VYM.

Level by level

  • Holdings27 in both8.3%
  • Sector11 Sectors64.3%
  • Countryby domicile98.8%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in MOAT and VYM, widest gap first
SectorMore in MOATMore in VYM
FinancialsVYM +16.3 points
TechnologyMOAT +14.0 points
Consumer StaplesMOAT +12.4 points
EnergyVYM +10.0 points
Consumer DiscretionaryMOAT +7.3 points
UtilitiesVYM +5.0 points
Health CareVYM +2.5 points
MaterialsVYM +1.9 points
CommunicationMOAT +1.7 points
IndustrialsMOAT +0.5 points
Real EstateSame weight

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in MOAT and VYM, widest gap first
CountryMore in MOATMore in VYM
United StatesVYM +1.2 points
BrazilMOAT +1.2 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • MOAT26.6%
  • VYM26.2%

Securities held

  • MOAT54
  • VYM594

Asset class

MOAT
Equity
VYM
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in MOAT27
  • In both27
  • Only in VYM567

Only in MOAT

27 securities, 47.9% of MOAT by weight

  • Danaher Corp2.88%
  • Microsoft Corp2.78%
  • Ge Healthcare Technologies Inc2.72%

Only in VYM

567 securities, 86.8% of VYM by weight

  • JPMorgan Chase & Co3.76%
  • ExxonMobil Holdings Corp2.85%
  • Johnson & Johnson2.71%

Weight gaps

All 27 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in MOAT and VYM, widest gap first
HoldingMore in MOATMore in VYM
Broadcom IncAVGOVYM +4.76 points
Estee Lauder Cos Inc/TheELMOAT +2.66 points
Huntington Ingalls Industries IncHIIMOAT +2.57 points
Broadridge Financial Solutions IncBRMOAT +2.56 points
Brown-Forman CorpBF.BMOAT +2.48 points
Kenvue IncKVUEMOAT +2.42 points
Otis Worldwide CorpOTISMOAT +2.41 points
Tractor Supply CoTSCOMOAT +2.40 points

All 58 MOAT holdings⁠All 589 VYM holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

MOAT vs VYM Cost

Overpaying MOAT vs VYM

$8,381

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • MOAT 0.46%

    $9,230

  • VYM 0.04%

    $849

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • MOAT 0.46%
  • VYM 0.04%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530MOAT $9,230VYM $849

Year by year

YearMOATVYMOverpaying
10$830$73$757
20$3,195$288$2,907
30$9,230$849$8,381

Expense ratio

  • 0.46%MOAT
  • 0.04%VYM, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Multifactor funds
  • Median 0.29%

VYM cheapest of 99 funds

MOAT 72nd cheapest of 99 funds

MOAT vs VYM Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
MOAT 1.25%
VYM 2.24%, better
Payout (12M)
MOAT $1.40
VYM $3.68
Last payment
MOAT $1.40
VYM $0.89
Ex-dividend
MOAT Dec 22, 2025
VYM Sep 18, 2026
Paid on
MOAT Dec 26, 2025
VYM Sep 22, 2026
Frequency
MOAT Annual
VYM Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

MOATAnnual · 9 paymentsAll MOAT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 9 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 18, 2017 $0.46; Dec 20, 2018 $0.74; Dec 23, 2019 $0.72; Dec 21, 2020 $0.90; Dec 20, 2021 $0.82; Dec 19, 2022 $0.81; Dec 18, 2023 $0.73; Dec 23, 2024 $1.27; Dec 22, 2025 $1.40. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD
VYMQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll VYM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 22, 2017 $0.56; Jun 23, 2017 $0.60; Sep 20, 2017 $0.60; Dec 21, 2017 $0.64; Mar 26, 2018 $0.61; Jun 22, 2018 $0.63; Sep 26, 2018 $0.67; Dec 24, 2018 $0.74; Mar 25, 2019 $0.65; Jun 17, 2019 $0.62; Sep 24, 2019 $0.79; Dec 23, 2019 $0.78; Mar 10, 2020 $0.55; Jun 22, 2020 $0.84; Sep 21, 2020 $0.71; Dec 21, 2020 $0.81; Mar 22, 2021 $0.66; Jun 21, 2021 $0.75; Sep 20, 2021 $0.75; Dec 20, 2021 $0.94; Mar 21, 2022 $0.66; Jun 21, 2022 $0.85; Sep 19, 2022 $0.77; Dec 19, 2022 $0.97; Mar 20, 2023 $0.72; Jun 20, 2023 $0.88; Sep 18, 2023 $0.78; Dec 18, 2023 $1.10; Mar 15, 2024 $0.66; Jun 21, 2024 $1.02; Sep 20, 2024 $0.85; Dec 20, 2024 $0.96; Mar 21, 2025 $0.85; Jun 20, 2025 $0.86; Sep 19, 2025 $0.84; Dec 19, 2025 $0.95; Mar 20, 2026 $0.86; Jun 18, 2026 $0.98; Sep 18, 2026 $0.89. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD

MOAT vs VYM Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • MOAT
  • VYM
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: MOAT −23.9% · Oct 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
MOAT 14.7%VYM 11.1%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
MOAT 0.86VYM 1.38, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
MOAT −23.9%VYM −15.9%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
MOAT 0.92VYM 0.75

MOAT and VYM in the news

Popular comparisons

  • MOATCvsVONVA

    VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF · Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.46% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VYMAvsVONVA

    Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF · Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MOATCvsILCVA

    VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF · iShares Morningstar Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.46% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VYMAvsILCVA

    Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF · iShares Morningstar Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MOATCvsIMCVA

    VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF · iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.46% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VYMAvsIMCVA

    Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF · iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.