ILCV ranks 2nd and PALC 84th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
ILCV vs PALC
ILCV −0.56pt a year
0.04%0.60%
ILCV 3.3×the volume
25.1K7.71K
ILCV +6.8pt
+12.5%+5.7%
ILCV vs PALC Performance
+79.9%+31.6%
- ILCV 0.04%, better
- PALC 0.60%
- ILCV $1.37B
- PALC $185M
- ILCV +22.4%, better
- PALC +5.2%
- ILCV 1.50%, better
- PALC 1.32%
- ILCV 374
- PALC 180
- ILCV 25.1K sh, better
- PALC 7.71K sh
- ILCV $108.28
- PALC $52.18
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ILCV | PALC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A99Higher | F15 |
| Mission | A82Higher | A75 |
| Risk | A91Higher | D32 |
| Tradability | B62Higher | D30 |
| Holdings | D39 | B60Higher |
| Durability | A82Higher | D30 |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. ILCV and PALC are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ILCVA
PALCC
In short
ILCV Value done the thorough way: roughly 400 large- and mid-cap US stocks screened on five separate value measures, not just cheap book value. Running since 2004 at four basis points, it's one of the cheapest tickets into the value factor.
PALC Most factor funds pick one lane and stay there. PALC rotates instead: a rules-based index shifts among value, momentum, quality and low-volatility corners of the S&P 500 rather than blending all four at once.
Stated mandate
ILCV The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. large- and mid-cap stocks selected with value-oriented measures including forward earnings, book value, sales, cash flow, and dividend yield.
PALC The fund seeks capital appreciation by using a rules-based process that rotates among factor-based strategies within S&P 500 companies.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ILCV vs PALC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ILCV vs PALC Cost
Overpaying PALC vs ILCV
$10,968
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ILCV 0.04%
$849
PALC 0.60%
$11,817
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ILCV | PALC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $73 | $1,076 | $1,003 |
| 20 | $288 | $4,116 | $3,828 |
| 30 | $849 | $11,817 | $10,968 |
- 0.04%ILCV, cheaper
- 0.60%PALC
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
ILCV cheapest of 99 funds
PALC 82nd cheapest of 99 funds
ILCV vs PALC Dividends
- ILCV 1.50%, better
- PALC 1.32%
- ILCV $1.65
- PALC $0.70
- ILCV $0.42
- PALC $0.22
- ILCV Sep 15, 2026
- PALC Sep 3, 2026
- ILCV Sep 18, 2026
- PALC Sep 8, 2026
- ILCV Quarterly
- PALC Quarterly
Distribution history
ILCV vs PALC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ILCV
- PALC
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ILCV 10.7%, betterPALC 14.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- ILCV 1.57, betterPALC 0.70
- Worst fall
- ILCV −18.6%, betterPALC −23.8%
- Market sensitivity
- ILCV 0.82PALC 0.94
Popular comparisons
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.14%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.14%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.