VYM ranks 2nd and PALC 84th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
PALC vs VYM
VYM −0.56pt a year
0.60%0.04%
VYM 149.0×the volume
7.71K1.15M
VYM +5.6pt
+5.7%+11.3%
PALC vs VYM Performance
+31.6%+70.4%
- PALC 0.60%
- VYM 0.04%, better
- PALC $185M
- VYM $78.9B
- PALC +5.2%
- VYM +18.9%, better
- PALC 1.32%
- VYM 2.26%, better
- PALC 180
- VYM 610
- PALC 7.71K sh
- VYM 1.15M sh, better
- PALC $52.18
- VYM $159.07
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PALC | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F15 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A75 | A81Higher |
| Risk | D32 | A82Higher |
| Tradability | D30 | B61Higher |
| Holdings | B60Higher | C53 |
| Durability | D30 | A94Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. PALC and VYM are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PALCC
VYMA
In short
PALC Most factor funds pick one lane and stay there. PALC rotates instead: a rules-based index shifts among value, momentum, quality and low-volatility corners of the S&P 500 rather than blending all four at once.
VYM The no-frills dividend workhorse. VYM buys the higher-yielding end of the US market, roughly 600 names, for four basis points: no quality screen, no dividend-growth-streak test, just yield, at scale since 2006.
Stated mandate
PALC The fund seeks capital appreciation by using a rules-based process that rotates among factor-based strategies within S&P 500 companies.
VYM The Fund seeks to track a benchmark index measuring the investment return of common stocks from companies characterized by high dividend yields.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PALC vs VYM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PALC vs VYM Cost
Overpaying PALC vs VYM
$10,968
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PALC 0.60%
$11,817
VYM 0.04%
$849
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PALC | VYM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,076 | $73 | $1,003 |
| 20 | $4,116 | $288 | $3,828 |
| 30 | $11,817 | $849 | $10,968 |
- 0.60%PALC
- 0.04%VYM, cheaper
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
VYM cheapest of 99 funds
PALC 82nd cheapest of 99 funds
PALC vs VYM Dividends
- PALC 1.32%
- VYM 2.26%, better
- PALC $0.70
- VYM $3.68
- PALC $0.22
- VYM $0.89
- PALC Sep 3, 2026
- VYM Sep 18, 2026
- PALC Sep 8, 2026
- VYM Sep 22, 2026
- PALC Quarterly
- VYM Quarterly
Distribution history
PALC vs VYM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- PALC
- VYM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PALC 14.9%VYM 11.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- PALC 0.70VYM 1.38, better
- Worst fall
- PALC −23.8%VYM −15.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- PALC 0.94VYM 0.74
PALC and VYM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.60% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.14%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.14%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


