VONV ranks 1st and PALC 84th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
PALC vs VONV
VONV −0.54pt a year
0.60%0.06%
VONV 100.6×the volume
7.71K776K
VONV +6.0pt
+5.7%+11.7%
PALC vs VONV Performance
+31.6%+73.9%
- PALC 0.60%
- VONV 0.06%, better
- PALC $185M
- VONV $21.7B
- PALC +5.2%
- VONV +30.6%, better
- PALC 1.32%
- VONV 1.51%, better
- PALC 180
- VONV 887
- PALC 7.71K sh
- VONV 776K sh, better
- PALC $52.18
- VONV $112.88
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PALC | VONV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F15 | A96Higher |
| Mission | A75 | A100Higher |
| Risk | D32 | A89Higher |
| Tradability | D30 | B59Higher |
| Holdings | B60Higher | C49 |
| Durability | D30 | A92Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. PALC and VONV are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PALCC
VONVA
In short
PALC Most factor funds pick one lane and stay there. PALC rotates instead: a rules-based index shifts among value, momentum, quality and low-volatility corners of the S&P 500 rather than blending all four at once.
VONV The plain-vanilla value trade, done cheap: about 900 large US value stocks, full replication of the Russell 1000 Value Index, 0.06% a year. No factor cocktail, no premium price tag, and one of the strongest implementations in its factor peer group.
Stated mandate
PALC The fund seeks capital appreciation by using a rules-based process that rotates among factor-based strategies within S&P 500 companies.
VONV The fund seeks to track the Russell 1000 Value Index, representing large-capitalization value stocks in the United States. It uses passive indexing and full replication to remain closely aligned with that benchmark.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PALC vs VONV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PALC vs VONV Cost
Overpaying PALC vs VONV
$10,547
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PALC 0.60%
$11,817
VONV 0.06%
$1,270
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PALC | VONV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,076 | $110 | $966 |
| 20 | $4,116 | $432 | $3,684 |
| 30 | $11,817 | $1,270 | $10,547 |
- 0.60%PALC
- 0.06%VONV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
VONV 4th cheapest of 99 funds
PALC 82nd cheapest of 99 funds
PALC vs VONV Dividends
- PALC 1.32%
- VONV 1.51%, better
- PALC $0.70
- VONV $1.74
- PALC $0.22
- VONV $0.42
- PALC Sep 3, 2026
- VONV Sep 23, 2026
- PALC Sep 8, 2026
- VONV Sep 25, 2026
- PALC Quarterly
- VONV Quarterly
Distribution history
PALC vs VONV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- PALC
- VONV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PALC 14.9%VONV 12.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- PALC 0.70VONV 1.43, better
- Worst fall
- PALC −23.8%VONV −18.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- PALC 0.94VONV 0.85
PALC and VONV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.60% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.14%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.14%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

