ILIT ranks 2nd and LITP 11th of 12 funds in the Critical Materials Category.
ILIT vs LITP
ILIT −0.18pt a year
0.47%0.65%
LITP 3.5×the volume
10.6K37.3K
LITP +0.9pt
−9.5%−8.6%
ILIT vs LITP Performance
−18.2%−14.5%
- ILIT 0.47%, better
- LITP 0.65%
- ILIT $10M
- LITP $26M
- ILIT −18.2%
- LITP −14.5%, better
- ILIT 3.04%
- LITP 11.95%, better
- ILIT 54
- LITP 39
- ILIT 10.6K sh
- LITP 37.3K sh, better
- ILIT $10.46
- LITP $7.21
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ILIT | LITP |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | D38 |
| Mission | B64 | |
| Risk | D30Higher | F19 |
| Tradability | D26 | D34Higher |
| Holdings | B68Higher | C45 |
| Durability | C41Higher | D38 |
Rank among Critical Materials funds
Same Category. ILIT and LITP are both graded against the same 12 Critical Materials funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ILITB
LITPD
In short
ILIT Most lithium funds blend miners with EV makers and battery tech. ILIT stays at the source: an index of global companies whose main business is digging lithium ore or making lithium compounds, about 40 names, for 0.47% a year.
LITP Lithium, undiluted. LITP tracks a rules-based Nasdaq Sprott index of roughly 40 lithium miners worldwide, rather than the broad metals grab bag most critical-materials funds hand you.
Stated mandate
ILIT ILIT aims to replicate an index of U.S. and non-U.S. equity issuers whose principal activities are lithium-ore mining or lithium-compound manufacturing.
LITP The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return performance of the Nasdaq Sprott Lithium Miners Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ILIT vs LITP Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ILIT vs LITP Cost
Overpaying LITP vs ILIT
$3,299
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ILIT 0.47%
$9,418
LITP 0.65%
$12,717
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ILIT | LITP | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $847 | $1,163 | $316 |
| 20 | $3,261 | $4,440 | $1,179 |
| 30 | $9,418 | $12,717 | $3,299 |
- 0.47%ILIT, cheaper
- 0.65%LITP
- Middle half of Critical Materials funds
- Median 0.64%
ILIT cheapest of 12 funds
LITP 7th cheapest of 12 funds
ILIT vs LITP Dividends
- ILIT 3.04%
- LITP 11.95%, better
- ILIT $0.32
- LITP $0.89
- ILIT $0.02
- LITP $0.89
- ILIT Jun 15, 2026
- LITP Dec 18, 2025
- ILIT Jun 18, 2026
- LITP Dec 22, 2025
- ILIT Twice a year
- LITP Annual
Distribution history
ILIT vs LITP Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ILIT 46.6%, betterLITP 50.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- ILIT −0.11LITP −0.06, better
- Worst fall
- ILIT −73.7%LITP −74.8%
- Market sensitivity
- ILIT 1.66LITP 1.60
Popular comparisons
- 0.47% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.