Skip to content

LITP vs REMX

Sprott Lithium Miners ETF

LITPDNasdaq

VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF

REMXANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

REMX −0.12pt a year

LITP0.65%REMX0.53%

Avg volume · 30D

REMX 20.0×the volume

LITP37.3KREMX746K

3Y return · a year

REMX +8.3pt

LITP−8.6%REMX−0.3%

LITP vs REMX Performance

Nov 7, 2025 – Nov 9, 2026

−14.5%LITP−16.2%REMX

Nov 7, 2025 to Nov 9, 2026. LITP −14.5%. REMX −16.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.25%50%75%100%Nov 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
LITP 0.65%
REMX 0.53%, better
Fund size
LITP $26M
REMX $1.46B
1Y total return
LITP −14.5%, better
REMX −16.2%
Yield (12M)
LITP 11.95%, better
REMX 2.42%
Holdings
LITP 39
REMX 36
Avg volume (30D)
LITP 37.3K sh
REMX 746K sh, better
NAV per share
LITP $7.21
REMX $51.50
52W range

ETF.net Grade

LITP: Cost 38, Risk 19, Mission 64, Tradability 34, Holdings 45, Durability 38. REMX: Cost 89, Risk 32, Mission not scored, Tradability 97, Holdings 55, Durability 92.
Pillar letters and Scores for LITP, REMX, with each pillar’s weight
PillarLITPREMX
Cost30% weightD38A89Higher
Mission25% weightB64Not scored
Risk15% weightF19D32Higher
Tradability15% weightD34A97Higher
Holdings10% weightC45B55Higher
Durability5% weightD38A92Higher

Rank among Critical Materials funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. LITP and REMX are both graded against the same 12 Critical Materials funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Critical Materials⁠

Category · 12 funds
See all 12 ›

REMX ranks 1st and LITP 11th of 12 funds in the Critical Materials Category.

  1. Rank 1AREMXVanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETFScore 75
  2. Rank 2BEARTGlobal X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETFScore 61
  3. Rank 10CWDIGWisdomTree Efficient Rare Earth Plus Strategic Metals FundScore 40
  4. Rank 11DLITPSprott Lithium Miners ETFScore 34
  5. Rank 12DNIKLSprott Nickel Miners ETFScore 27

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

LITPDSprott Lithium Miners ETF

REMXAVanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF

In short

LITP Lithium, undiluted. LITP tracks a rules-based Nasdaq Sprott index of roughly 40 lithium miners worldwide, rather than the broad metals grab bag most critical-materials funds hand you.

REMX The original rare earths ETF. Trading since 2010, it holds roughly 30 miners, refiners and recyclers of the metals behind magnets, EV motors and defense hardware, in one concentrated global basket priced under most of its critical-materials rivals.

Stated mandate

LITP The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return performance of the Nasdaq Sprott Lithium Miners Index.

REMX The fund seeks global exposure to companies involved in producing, refining, and recycling rare earth and strategic metals and minerals, while tracking the MVIS Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index before fees and expenses.

Why people hold it

  • LITP One idea, cleanly expressed: a passive Nasdaq Sprott index of about 40 lithium miners globally, with no manager discretion over what gets in.
  • The 0.65% fee sits right at the median for critical-materials ETFs, so the narrow focus costs no more than the broad funds in the group.
  • Sprott runs it beside the wider SETM at the same 0.65% fee: one shop, two dial settings on critical materials.
  • Live since 2023, it is a pure miners basket, tracking the companies that dig lithium out of the ground rather than the whole battery supply chain.
  • REMX Launched in 2010, it is the elder statesman of rare earth funds, and its mandate spans producers, refiners and recyclers worldwide rather than one link in the chain.
  • Fee of 0.53% a year undercuts Global X's EART (0.59%) and Sprott's SETM (0.65%), and sits below the median for its critical-materials peer group.
  • A multi-billion-dollar fund that trades actively, which matters in a corner of the market where the underlying stocks are thin.
  • Rules-based, not discretionary: the basket follows the MVIS Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index, so holdings are set by published index rules.

Worth knowing

  • LITP One commodity, one step in the chain. Roughly 40 miners tied to the lithium price tend to move as a pack, which makes for a bumpy ride.
  • ILIT covers the same lithium-miners lane for 0.47%, and PICK spans global metals and mining for 0.39%. Several peers in this group review more strongly overall.
  • A small fund with only moderate trading, and payouts come once or twice a year at most. Spreads and order type matter more here than in a mega-fund.
  • REMX About 30 holdings means one company's news can move the whole fund. This is a focused bet on a single supply chain, not a diversified materials sleeve.
  • Mining and refining shares move with commodity prices, so swings here run deeper and faster than in a broad equity fund.
  • Distributions arrive annually or semiannually, so cash flow is lumpy rather than a steady drip.

Full LITP profile⁠

Full REMX profile⁠

LITP vs REMX Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

LITP vs REMX Cost

Overpaying LITP vs REMX

$2,181

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • LITP 0.65%

    $12,717

  • REMX 0.53%

    $10,536

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • LITP 0.65%
  • REMX 0.53%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530LITP $12,717REMX $10,536

Year by year

YearLITPREMXOverpaying
10$1,163$953$210
20$4,440$3,658$782
30$12,717$10,536$2,181

Expense ratio

  • 0.65%LITP
  • 0.53%REMX, cheaper
  • Middle half of Critical Materials funds
  • Median 0.64%

REMX 2nd cheapest of 12 funds

LITP 7th cheapest of 12 funds

LITP vs REMX Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Yield (12M)
LITP 11.95%, better
REMX 2.42%
Payout (12M)
LITP $0.89
REMX $1.30
Last payment
LITP $0.89
REMX $1.30
Ex-dividend
LITP Dec 18, 2025
REMX Dec 22, 2025
Paid on
LITP Dec 22, 2025
REMX Dec 26, 2025
Frequency
LITP Annual
REMX Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

LITPAnnual · 3 paymentsAll LITP payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 14, 2023 $0.35; Dec 12, 2024 $0.44; Dec 18, 2025 $0.89. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$52017202020232026YTD
REMXAnnual · 8 paymentsAll REMX payments⁠
One bar per payment. 8 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 18, 2017 $2.61; Dec 20, 2018 $5.06; Dec 23, 2019 $0.65; Dec 21, 2020 $0.53; Dec 20, 2021 $5.89; Dec 19, 2022 $1.19; Dec 23, 2024 $1.00; Dec 22, 2025 $1.30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$52017202020232026YTD

LITP vs REMX Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
LITP 50.4%REMX 45.2%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
LITP −0.06REMX 0.06, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
LITP −74.8%since Feb 2023REMX −73.3%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
LITP 1.60REMX 1.59

LITP and REMX in the news

Popular comparisons

  • LITPDvsEARTB

    Sprott Lithium Miners ETF · Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • REMXAvsEARTB

    VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF · Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.53% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LITPDvsILITB

    Sprott Lithium Miners ETF · iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.47%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • REMXAvsILITB

    VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF · iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.53% · 0.47%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LITPDvsSETMB

    Sprott Lithium Miners ETF · Sprott Critical Materials ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.65%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • REMXAvsSETMB

    VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF · Sprott Critical Materials ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.53% · 0.65%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.