REMX ranks 1st and LITP 11th of 12 funds in the Critical Materials Category.
LITP vs REMX
REMX −0.12pt a year
0.65%0.53%
REMX 20.0×the volume
37.3K746K
REMX +8.3pt
−8.6%−0.3%
LITP vs REMX Performance
−14.5%−16.2%
- LITP 0.65%
- REMX 0.53%, better
- LITP $26M
- REMX $1.46B
- LITP −14.5%, better
- REMX −16.2%
- LITP 11.95%, better
- REMX 2.42%
- LITP 39
- REMX 36
- LITP 37.3K sh
- REMX 746K sh, better
- LITP $7.21
- REMX $51.50
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | LITP | REMX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D38 | A89Higher |
| Mission | B64 | |
| Risk | F19 | D32Higher |
| Tradability | D34 | A97Higher |
| Holdings | C45 | B55Higher |
| Durability | D38 | A92Higher |
Rank among Critical Materials funds
Same Category. LITP and REMX are both graded against the same 12 Critical Materials funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
LITPD
REMXA
In short
LITP Lithium, undiluted. LITP tracks a rules-based Nasdaq Sprott index of roughly 40 lithium miners worldwide, rather than the broad metals grab bag most critical-materials funds hand you.
REMX The original rare earths ETF. Trading since 2010, it holds roughly 30 miners, refiners and recyclers of the metals behind magnets, EV motors and defense hardware, in one concentrated global basket priced under most of its critical-materials rivals.
Stated mandate
LITP The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return performance of the Nasdaq Sprott Lithium Miners Index.
REMX The fund seeks global exposure to companies involved in producing, refining, and recycling rare earth and strategic metals and minerals, while tracking the MVIS Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
LITP vs REMX Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
LITP vs REMX Cost
Overpaying LITP vs REMX
$2,181
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
LITP 0.65%
$12,717
REMX 0.53%
$10,536
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | LITP | REMX | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,163 | $953 | $210 |
| 20 | $4,440 | $3,658 | $782 |
| 30 | $12,717 | $10,536 | $2,181 |
- 0.65%LITP
- 0.53%REMX, cheaper
- Middle half of Critical Materials funds
- Median 0.64%
REMX 2nd cheapest of 12 funds
LITP 7th cheapest of 12 funds
LITP vs REMX Dividends
- LITP 11.95%, better
- REMX 2.42%
- LITP $0.89
- REMX $1.30
- LITP $0.89
- REMX $1.30
- LITP Dec 18, 2025
- REMX Dec 22, 2025
- LITP Dec 22, 2025
- REMX Dec 26, 2025
- LITP Annual
- REMX Annual
Distribution history
LITP vs REMX Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- LITP 50.4%REMX 45.2%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- LITP −0.06REMX 0.06, better
- Worst fall
- LITP −74.8%REMX −73.3%
- Market sensitivity
- LITP 1.60REMX 1.59
LITP and REMX in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.65% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.53% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.53% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.53% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.




