IMCG ranks 2nd and ISCG 10th of 35 funds in the US Growth Index Category.
IMCG vs ISCG
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.06%0.06%
IMCG 5.3×the volume
132K24.9K
IMCG +3.1pt
+14.3%+11.2%
IMCG vs ISCG Performance
+30.8%+23.1%
- IMCG 0.06%
- ISCG 0.06%
- IMCG $4.04B
- ISCG $961M
- IMCG +14.0%, better
- ISCG +11.4%
- IMCG 0.67%, better
- ISCG 0.65%
- IMCG 262
- ISCG 918
- IMCG 132K sh, better
- ISCG 24.9K sh
- IMCG $93.24
- ISCG $61.23
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IMCG | ISCG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A78 | A78 |
| Mission | A95Higher | A92 |
| Risk | A78Higher | C46 |
| Tradability | B61Higher | D30 |
| Holdings | A75 | A84Higher |
| Durability | B66Higher | C54 |
Rank among US Growth Index funds
Same Category. IMCG and ISCG are both graded against the same 35 US Growth Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IMCGA
ISCGB
In short
IMCG Growth investing usually means megacaps. IMCG works the middle of the market instead: roughly 300 mid-cap growth names, indexed since 2004, for six basis points a year.
ISCG A 2004-vintage small-cap growth sleeve that charges 0.06% and casts an unusually wide net, holding roughly 900 names selected on earnings, sales, cash flow and book value growth.
Stated mandate
IMCG The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S. mid-capitalization equities with growth characteristics. Its strategy uses representative sampling and generally invests at least 80% of assets in securities from the Underlying Index.
ISCG The fund seeks to track a U.S. small-cap index whose constituents are selected using growth measures including earnings, sales, cash flow, and book value growth.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IMCG vs ISCG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IMCG vs ISCG Cost
Same expense ratio
$1,270
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IMCG 0.06%
$1,270
ISCG 0.06%
$1,270
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IMCG | ISCG |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $110 | $110 |
| 20 | $432 | $432 |
| 30 | $1,270 | $1,270 |
- 0.06%IMCG
- 0.06%ISCG
- Middle half of US Growth Index funds
- Median 0.18%
IMCG 9th cheapest of 35 funds
ISCG 9th cheapest of 35 funds
IMCG vs ISCG Dividends
- IMCG 0.67%, better
- ISCG 0.65%
- IMCG $0.62
- ISCG $0.40
- IMCG $0.19
- ISCG $0.12
- IMCG Sep 15, 2026
- ISCG Sep 15, 2026
- IMCG Sep 18, 2026
- ISCG Sep 18, 2026
- IMCG Quarterly
- ISCG Quarterly
Distribution history
IMCG vs ISCG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- IMCG
- ISCG
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IMCG 16.6%, betterISCG 17.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- IMCG 0.97, betterISCG 0.88
- Worst fall
- IMCG −35.1%, betterISCG −37.8%
- Market sensitivity
- IMCG 1.14ISCG 1.14Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
IMCG and ISCG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

