IMCG ranks 2nd and MGK 10th of 35 funds in the US Growth Index Category.
IMCG vs MGK
MGK −0.01pt a year
0.06%0.05%
MGK 10.0×the volume
132K1.32M
MGK +4.2pt
+14.3%+18.5%
IMCG vs MGK Performance
+30.8%+75.1%
- IMCG 0.06%
- MGK 0.05%, better
- IMCG $4.04B
- MGK $35B
- IMCG +14.0%, better
- MGK +3.6%
- IMCG 0.67%, better
- MGK 0.35%
- IMCG 262
- MGK 55
- IMCG 132K sh
- MGK 1.32M sh, better
- IMCG $93.24
- MGK $86.83
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IMCG | MGK |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A78 | A78 |
| Mission | A95 | A99Higher |
| Risk | A78Higher | C40 |
| Tradability | B61Higher | B56 |
| Holdings | A75Higher | D25 |
| Durability | B66 | A79Higher |
Rank among US Growth Index funds
Same Category. IMCG and MGK are both graded against the same 35 US Growth Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IMCGA
MGKB
In short
IMCG Growth investing usually means megacaps. IMCG works the middle of the market instead: roughly 300 mid-cap growth names, indexed since 2004, for six basis points a year.
MGK The growth half of America's giants, roughly 70 names, for five basis points. Vanguard has run it since 2007, and it charges a quarter of what the typical mega-cap fund does.
Stated mandate
IMCG The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S. mid-capitalization equities with growth characteristics. Its strategy uses representative sampling and generally invests at least 80% of assets in securities from the Underlying Index.
MGK Seeks to track a benchmark measuring the return of large-capitalization growth stocks in the United States. The fund uses passive indexing to track the CRSP US Mega Cap Growth Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IMCG vs MGK Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IMCG vs MGK Cost
Overpaying IMCG vs MGK
$210
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IMCG 0.06%
$1,270
MGK 0.05%
$1,060
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IMCG | MGK | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $110 | $92 | $18 |
| 20 | $432 | $360 | $72 |
| 30 | $1,270 | $1,060 | $210 |
- 0.06%IMCG
- 0.05%MGK, cheaper
- Middle half of US Growth Index funds
- Median 0.18%
MGK 5th cheapest of 35 funds
IMCG 9th cheapest of 35 funds
IMCG vs MGK Dividends
- IMCG 0.67%, better
- MGK 0.35%
- IMCG $0.62
- MGK $0.30
- IMCG $0.19
- MGK $0.08
- IMCG Sep 15, 2026
- MGK Sep 28, 2026
- IMCG Sep 18, 2026
- MGK Sep 30, 2026
- IMCG Quarterly
- MGK Quarterly
Distribution history
IMCG vs MGK Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- IMCG
- MGK
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IMCG 16.6%, betterMGK 17.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- IMCG 0.97MGK 1.11, better
- Worst fall
- IMCG −35.1%, betterMGK −36.0%
- Market sensitivity
- IMCG 1.14MGK 1.27
IMCG and MGK in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

