IMCG ranks 2nd and PRXG 28th of 35 funds in the US Growth Index Category.
IMCG vs PRXG
IMCG −0.30pt a year
0.06%0.36%
IMCG 26.3×the volume
132K5.03K
IMCG vs PRXG Performance
+14.0%+3.6%
- IMCG 0.06%, better
- PRXG 0.36%
- IMCG $4.04B
- PRXG $88M
- IMCG +14.0%, better
- PRXG +3.6%
- IMCG 0.67%, better
- PRXG 0.11%
- IMCG 262
- PRXG 157
- IMCG 132K sh, better
- PRXG 5.03K sh
- IMCG $93.24
- PRXG $38.63
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IMCG | PRXG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A78Higher | D31 |
| Mission | A95 | A98Higher |
| Risk | A78Higher | D31 |
| Tradability | B61Higher | F20 |
| Holdings | A75Higher | D29 |
| Durability | B66Higher | D28 |
Rank among US Growth Index funds
Same Category. IMCG and PRXG are both graded against the same 35 US Growth Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IMCGA
PRXGC
In short
IMCG Growth investing usually means megacaps. IMCG works the middle of the market instead: roughly 300 mid-cap growth names, indexed since 2004, for six basis points a year.
PRXG Praxis wraps its ImpactX screen around the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index, so you get a mainstream large-cap growth benchmark with an impact filter layered on top. New in 2025, priced at 0.36%.
Stated mandate
IMCG The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S. mid-capitalization equities with growth characteristics. Its strategy uses representative sampling and generally invests at least 80% of assets in securities from the Underlying Index.
PRXG The Fund seeks capital appreciation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IMCG vs PRXG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IMCG vs PRXG Cost
Overpaying PRXG vs IMCG
$6,050
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IMCG 0.06%
$1,270
PRXG 0.36%
$7,320
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IMCG | PRXG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $110 | $652 | $542 |
| 20 | $432 | $2,522 | $2,090 |
| 30 | $1,270 | $7,320 | $6,050 |
- 0.06%IMCG, cheaper
- 0.36%PRXG
- Middle half of US Growth Index funds
- Median 0.18%
IMCG 9th cheapest of 35 funds
PRXG 25th cheapest of 35 funds
IMCG vs PRXG Dividends
- IMCG 0.67%, better
- PRXG 0.11%
- IMCG $0.62
- PRXG $0.04
- IMCG $0.19
- PRXG $0.01
- IMCG Sep 15, 2026
- PRXG Sep 29, 2026
- IMCG Sep 18, 2026
- PRXG Sep 30, 2026
- IMCG Quarterly
- PRXG Quarterly
Distribution history
IMCG vs PRXG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IMCG 16.6%PRXG 18.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- IMCG 0.97PRXG 1.01
- Worst fall
- IMCG −35.1%PRXG −15.9%
- Market sensitivity
- IMCG 1.14PRXG 1.39
IMCG and PRXG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.36% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.36% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.36% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

