IMCG ranks 2nd and VBK 6th of 35 funds in the US Growth Index Category.
IMCG vs VBK
VBK −0.01pt a year
0.06%0.05%
VBK 1.5×the volume
132K203K
IMCG +3.4pt
+14.3%+10.9%
IMCG vs VBK Performance
+30.8%+15.0%
- IMCG 0.06%
- VBK 0.05%, better
- IMCG $4.04B
- VBK $43B
- IMCG +14.0%, better
- VBK +9.2%
- IMCG 0.67%, better
- VBK 0.42%
- IMCG 262
- VBK 556
- IMCG 132K sh
- VBK 203K sh, better
- IMCG $93.24
- VBK $330.29
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IMCG | VBK |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A78 | A78 |
| Mission | A95 | A96Higher |
| Risk | A78Higher | C41 |
| Tradability | B61Higher | C43 |
| Holdings | A75 | A80Higher |
| Durability | B66 | A83Higher |
Rank among US Growth Index funds
Same Category. IMCG and VBK are both graded against the same 35 US Growth Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IMCGA
VBKA
In short
IMCG Growth investing usually means megacaps. IMCG works the middle of the market instead: roughly 300 mid-cap growth names, indexed since 2004, for six basis points a year.
VBK The small-cap outlier in a growth aisle dominated by mega-cap names. About 600 smaller U.S. growth companies, tracked by full replication for 0.05% a year, run by Vanguard since 2004.
Stated mandate
IMCG The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S. mid-capitalization equities with growth characteristics. Its strategy uses representative sampling and generally invests at least 80% of assets in securities from the Underlying Index.
VBK Seeks to track the CRSP US Small Cap Growth Index, representing growth companies among small-capitalization U.S. equities. The fund uses passive full replication and remains fully invested.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IMCG vs VBK Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IMCG vs VBK Cost
Overpaying IMCG vs VBK
$210
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IMCG 0.06%
$1,270
VBK 0.05%
$1,060
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IMCG | VBK | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $110 | $92 | $18 |
| 20 | $432 | $360 | $72 |
| 30 | $1,270 | $1,060 | $210 |
- 0.06%IMCG
- 0.05%VBK, cheaper
- Middle half of US Growth Index funds
- Median 0.18%
VBK 5th cheapest of 35 funds
IMCG 9th cheapest of 35 funds
IMCG vs VBK Dividends
- IMCG 0.67%, better
- VBK 0.42%
- IMCG $0.62
- VBK $1.40
- IMCG $0.19
- VBK $0.30
- IMCG Sep 15, 2026
- VBK Sep 28, 2026
- IMCG Sep 18, 2026
- VBK Sep 30, 2026
- IMCG Quarterly
- VBK Quarterly
Distribution history
IMCG vs VBK Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- IMCG
- VBK
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IMCG 16.6%, betterVBK 18.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- IMCG 0.97, betterVBK 0.79
- Worst fall
- IMCG −35.1%, betterVBK −38.4%
- Market sensitivity
- IMCG 1.14VBK 1.19
IMCG and VBK in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


