IMCG ranks 2nd and VONG 8th of 35 funds in the US Growth Index Category.
IMCG vs VONG
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.06%0.06%
VONG 8.0×the volume
132K1.06M
VONG +3.3pt
+14.3%+17.6%
IMCG vs VONG Performance
+30.8%+63.4%
- IMCG 0.06%
- VONG 0.06%
- IMCG $4.04B
- VONG $55.6B
- IMCG +14.0%, better
- VONG −2.6%
- IMCG 0.67%, better
- VONG 0.48%
- IMCG 262
- VONG 374
- IMCG 132K sh
- VONG 1.06M sh, better
- IMCG $93.24
- VONG $121.06
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IMCG | VONG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A78 | A78 |
| Mission | A95 | A100Higher |
| Risk | A78Higher | D33 |
| Tradability | B61Higher | C52 |
| Holdings | A75Higher | C41 |
| Durability | B66 | A83Higher |
Rank among US Growth Index funds
Same Category. IMCG and VONG are both graded against the same 35 US Growth Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IMCGA
VONGA
In short
IMCG Growth investing usually means megacaps. IMCG works the middle of the market instead: roughly 300 mid-cap growth names, indexed since 2004, for six basis points a year.
VONG The same Russell 1000 Growth index that sits behind the category's best-known growth ETF, for 0.06% a year. Vanguard buys the whole large-cap growth sleeve, cap-weighted, and otherwise stays out of the way.
Stated mandate
IMCG The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S. mid-capitalization equities with growth characteristics. Its strategy uses representative sampling and generally invests at least 80% of assets in securities from the Underlying Index.
VONG The ETF seeks to track the Russell 1000 Growth Index, which represents large-capitalization growth stocks in the United States. It uses passive full replication and remains fully invested.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IMCG vs VONG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IMCG vs VONG Cost
Same expense ratio
$1,270
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IMCG 0.06%
$1,270
VONG 0.06%
$1,270
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IMCG | VONG |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $110 | $110 |
| 20 | $432 | $432 |
| 30 | $1,270 | $1,270 |
- 0.06%IMCG
- 0.06%VONG
- Middle half of US Growth Index funds
- Median 0.18%
IMCG 9th cheapest of 35 funds
VONG 9th cheapest of 35 funds
IMCG vs VONG Dividends
- IMCG 0.67%, better
- VONG 0.48%
- IMCG $0.62
- VONG $0.58
- IMCG $0.19
- VONG $0.14
- IMCG Sep 15, 2026
- VONG Sep 23, 2026
- IMCG Sep 18, 2026
- VONG Sep 25, 2026
- IMCG Quarterly
- VONG Quarterly
Distribution history
IMCG vs VONG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- IMCG
- VONG
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IMCG 16.6%, betterVONG 16.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- IMCG 0.97VONG 1.02, better
- Worst fall
- IMCG −35.1%VONG −32.7%, better
- Market sensitivity
- IMCG 1.14VONG 1.16
IMCG and VONG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

