Skip to content

IMCG vs VONG

iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF

IMCGANYSE Arca

Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF

VONGANasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

IMCG0.06%VONG0.06%

Avg volume · 30D

VONG 8.0×the volume

IMCG132KVONG1.06M

10Y return · a year

VONG +3.3pt

IMCG+14.3%VONG+17.6%

IMCG vs VONG Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+30.8%IMCG+63.4%VONG

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. IMCG +30.8%. VONG +63.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%80%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
IMCG 0.06%
VONG 0.06%
Fund size
IMCG $4.04B
VONG $55.6B
1Y total return
IMCG +14.0%, better
VONG −2.6%
Yield (12M)
IMCG 0.67%, better
VONG 0.48%
Holdings
IMCG 262
VONG 374
Avg volume (30D)
IMCG 132K sh
VONG 1.06M sh, better
NAV per share
IMCG $93.24
VONG $121.06
52W range

ETF.net Grade

IMCG: Cost 78, Risk 78, Mission 95, Tradability 61, Holdings 75, Durability 66. VONG: Cost 78, Risk 33, Mission 100, Tradability 52, Holdings 41, Durability 83.
Pillar letters and Scores for IMCG, VONG, with each pillar’s weight
PillarIMCGVONG
Cost30% weightA78A78
Mission25% weightA95A100Higher
Risk15% weightA78HigherD33
Tradability15% weightB61HigherC52
Holdings10% weightA75HigherC41
Durability5% weightB66A83Higher

Rank among US Growth Index funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. IMCG and VONG are both graded against the same 35 US Growth Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Growth Index⁠

Category · 35 funds
See all 35 ›

IMCG ranks 2nd and VONG 8th of 35 funds in the US Growth Index Category.

  1. Rank 1ASPYGState Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETFScore 84
  2. Rank 2AILCGiShares Morningstar Growth ETFScore 78
  3. Rank 2AIMCGiShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETFScore 78
  4. Rank 2ASCHGSchwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETFScore 78
  5. Rank 8ASFYSoFi Select 500 ETFScore 69
  6. Rank 8AVONGVanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETFScore 69
  7. Rank 10BISCGiShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETFScore 68

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

IMCGAiShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF

VONGAVanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF

In short

IMCG Growth investing usually means megacaps. IMCG works the middle of the market instead: roughly 300 mid-cap growth names, indexed since 2004, for six basis points a year.

VONG The same Russell 1000 Growth index that sits behind the category's best-known growth ETF, for 0.06% a year. Vanguard buys the whole large-cap growth sleeve, cap-weighted, and otherwise stays out of the way.

Stated mandate

IMCG The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S. mid-capitalization equities with growth characteristics. Its strategy uses representative sampling and generally invests at least 80% of assets in securities from the Underlying Index.

VONG The ETF seeks to track the Russell 1000 Growth Index, which represents large-capitalization growth stocks in the United States. It uses passive full replication and remains fully invested.

Why people hold it

  • IMCG 0.06% a year, one third of the 0.18% median for its growth-fund peer group. Mid-cap indexing at large-cap-index prices.
  • The growth leaderboard is stacked with large-cap funds (VUG, SCHG, SPYG, VONG). IMCG covers the middle instead, holding about 300 mid-cap growth names.
  • Sticks close to the Morningstar mid-cap growth index it follows, one of the tighter tracking jobs in its peer group.
  • Running since 2004 under the iShares roof, with a multi-billion-dollar asset base behind it.
  • VONG 0.06% a year against a 0.18% cohort median, and the older, better-known ETF on the very same Russell index (IWF) charges 0.18%. Same benchmark, a third of the fee.vanguard.com
  • The prospectus calls for full replication and staying fully invested, no sampling shortcuts. Index tracking sits among the tightest in the US growth group.vanguard.com
  • Trading since 2010 and now a multi-billion-dollar fund with steady daily volume, which usually means thin spreads and easy fills.
  • Its universe is the Russell 1000, so the growth sleeve (roughly 400 stocks) reaches past the S&P 500 roster that funds like SPYG are boxed into. Pays quarterly.

Worth knowing

  • IMCG Moderately traded rather than heavily traded, so bid-ask spreads can run wider than the megacap growth ETFs sitting beside it in the category.
  • This is a size-and-style bet. Mid-cap growth companies tend to move more sharply than the broad market, in both directions.
  • Distributions land quarterly, but a growth screen is not built around income.
  • VONG Cap-weighted growth is top-heavy: roughly 400 names, but the mega-cap leaders set the pace, and the ride tends to be bumpier than the broad market.
  • Russell scores companies on both growth and value, so a single mega-cap can sit in both indexes at once and shift weight between them at reconstitution.lseg.com
  • Cheap, not the cheapest shelf: VUG, SCHG and SPYG charge less using different growth definitions. The Russell recipe costs a couple of basis points more.

Full IMCG profile⁠

Full VONG profile⁠

IMCG vs VONG Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

IMCG vs VONG Cost

Same expense ratio

$1,270

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • IMCG 0.06%

    $1,270

  • VONG 0.06%

    $1,270

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • IMCG 0.06%
  • VONG 0.06%
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$500$1K$1.5K051015202530IMCG $1,270VONG $1,270

Year by year

YearIMCGVONG
10$110$110
20$432$432
30$1,270$1,270

Expense ratio

  • 0.06%IMCG
  • 0.06%VONG
  • Middle half of US Growth Index funds
  • Median 0.18%

IMCG 9th cheapest of 35 funds

VONG 9th cheapest of 35 funds

IMCG vs VONG Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
IMCG 0.67%, better
VONG 0.48%
Payout (12M)
IMCG $0.62
VONG $0.58
Last payment
IMCG $0.19
VONG $0.14
Ex-dividend
IMCG Sep 15, 2026
VONG Sep 23, 2026
Paid on
IMCG Sep 18, 2026
VONG Sep 25, 2026
Frequency
IMCG Quarterly
VONG Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

IMCGQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll IMCG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 24, 2017 $0.03; Jun 27, 2017 $0.03; Sep 26, 2017 $0.05; Dec 19, 2017 $0.04; Mar 22, 2018 $0.03; Jun 26, 2018 $0.03; Sep 26, 2018 $0.02; Dec 17, 2018 $0.03; Mar 20, 2019 $0.02; Jun 17, 2019 $0.02; Sep 24, 2019 $0.02; Dec 16, 2019 $0.07; Mar 25, 2020 $0.02; Jun 15, 2020 $0.02; Sep 23, 2020 $0.01; Dec 14, 2020 $0.0067; Mar 25, 2021 $0.0083; Jun 10, 2021 $0.08; Sep 24, 2021 $0.10; Dec 13, 2021 $0.11; Mar 24, 2022 $0.10; Jun 9, 2022 $0.08; Sep 26, 2022 $0.14; Dec 13, 2022 $0.18; Mar 23, 2023 $0.12; Jun 7, 2023 $0.09; Sep 26, 2023 $0.15; Dec 20, 2023 $0.18; Mar 21, 2024 $0.13; Jun 11, 2024 $0.11; Sep 25, 2024 $0.18; Dec 17, 2024 $0.17; Mar 18, 2025 $0.12; Jun 16, 2025 $0.14; Sep 16, 2025 $0.16; Dec 16, 2025 $0.21; Mar 17, 2026 $0.12; Jun 15, 2026 $0.10; Sep 15, 2026 $0.19. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.202017202020232026YTD
VONGQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll VONG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 22, 2017 $0.09; Jun 28, 2017 $0.11; Sep 27, 2017 $0.10; Dec 14, 2017 $0.11; Mar 22, 2018 $0.09; Jun 28, 2018 $0.11; Sep 26, 2018 $0.17; Dec 13, 2018 $0.02; Mar 25, 2019 $0.09; Jun 21, 2019 $0.12; Sep 26, 2019 $0.13; Dec 16, 2019 $0.12; Mar 26, 2020 $0.12; Jun 25, 2020 $0.11; Sep 11, 2020 $0.08; Dec 17, 2020 $0.16; Mar 26, 2021 $0.10; Jun 29, 2021 $0.11; Sep 29, 2021 $0.12; Dec 16, 2021 $0.13; Mar 24, 2022 $0.11; Jun 29, 2022 $0.13; Sep 28, 2022 $0.15; Dec 15, 2022 $0.15; Mar 23, 2023 $0.13; Jun 23, 2023 $0.13; Sep 21, 2023 $0.13; Dec 19, 2023 $0.17; Mar 21, 2024 $0.15; Jun 27, 2024 $0.14; Sep 26, 2024 $0.14; Dec 23, 2024 $0.14; Mar 25, 2025 $0.14; Jun 20, 2025 $0.13; Sep 24, 2025 $0.14; Dec 22, 2025 $0.14; Mar 24, 2026 $0.14; Jun 18, 2026 $0.16; Sep 23, 2026 $0.14. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.202017202020232026YTD

IMCG vs VONG Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • IMCG
  • VONG
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: IMCG −35.1% · Oct 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−30%−20%−10%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
IMCG 16.6%, betterVONG 16.9%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
IMCG 0.97VONG 1.02, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
IMCG −35.1%VONG −32.7%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
IMCG 1.14VONG 1.16

IMCG and VONG in the news

Popular comparisons

  • IMCGAvsSPYGA

    iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF · State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VONGAvsSPYGA

    Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF · State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IMCGAvsILCGA

    iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF · iShares Morningstar Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VONGAvsILCGA

    Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF · iShares Morningstar Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IMCGAvsSCHGA

    iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF · Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VONGAvsSCHGA

    Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF · Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.