IMCV vs QGRW: Grades, Fees and Holdings Compared

iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF

IMCVANasdaq

WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund

QGRWCNYSE Arca

Overlap

1.7%by weight

Expense ratio

IMCV −0.22pt a year

IMCV0.06%QGRW0.28%

Avg volume · 30D

QGRW 6.7×the volume

IMCV38.9KQGRW259K

3Y return · a year

QGRW +4.4pt

IMCV+21.2%QGRW+25.6%

IMCV vs QGRW Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

+27.6%IMCV+6.6%QGRW

Expense ratio: IMCV 0.06%, better; QGRW 0.28%
Fund size: IMCV $1.27B; QGRW $3.13B
1Y total return: IMCV +27.6%, better; QGRW +6.6%
Yield (12M): IMCV 1.83%, better; QGRW 0.08%
Holdings: IMCV 271; QGRW 101
Avg volume (30D): IMCV 38.9K sh; QGRW 259K sh, better
NAV per share: IMCV $99.16; QGRW $64.55
52W range

ETF.net Grade

Pillar letters and Scores for IMCV, QGRW, with each pillar’s weight
Pillar	IMCV	QGRW
Cost30% weight	A96Higher	B55
Mission25% weight	A76Higher	B62
Risk15% weight	A77Higher	F22
Tradability15% weight	B69	A84Higher
Holdings10% weight	B69Higher	F22
Durability5% weight	A77Higher	C54

Rank among US Multifactor funds

How we build Categories ›

Same Category. IMCV and QGRW are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Multifactor⁠

Category · 99 funds

See all 99 ›

IMCV ranks 4th and QGRW 56th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.

Rank 1AVONVVanguard Russell 1000 Value ETFScore 85
Rank 2AILCViShares Morningstar Value ETFScore 81
Rank 2AVYMVanguard High Dividend Yield ETFScore 81
Rank 4AIMCViShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETFScore 80
Rank 5ADCORU.S. Core Equity 1 Portfolio ETF Class SharesScore 79
Rank 56CGRPMInvesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETFScore 52
Rank 56CQGRWWisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth FundScore 52
Rank 56CXSVMInvesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETFScore 52

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

IMCVAiShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF

QGRWCWisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund

In short

IMCV No data

QGRW Most growth funds buy the entire growth half of the market. QGRW ranks the 500 biggest US companies on growth and profitability, equal weight to each, and keeps only the top 100 scorers. Concentrated on purpose.

Stated mandate

IMCV No data

QGRW The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Index.

Why people hold it

IMCV No data

QGRW The screen is 50/50: growth (analyst earnings forecasts, five-year EBITDA and sales) and quality (three-year average return on equity and assets). Only 100 of 500 make it.wisdomtree.com wisdomtree.com 2
At 0.28% a year it sits under the typical fund in its US multifactor peer group, cheap for a screen this specific.
Multi-billion-dollar scale and one of the easier funds in its peer group to trade in size.

Worth knowing

IMCV No data

QGRW Market-cap weighted and non-diversified per its prospectus, so the largest holdings drive returns and one stock's move lands harder than in a broad index.wisdomtree.com wisdomtree.com 2
A quality-growth screen concentrates in fast-growing large caps; WisdomTree notes the fund tracks its index rather than taking defensive positions in falling markets.wisdomtree.com
Plain growth index trackers such as IUSG charge far less. Here the fee buys the screen, not broad growth exposure.

Full IMCV profile⁠

Full QGRW profile⁠

IMCV vs QGRW Holdings

How IMCV and QGRW differ

Overlap by weight

1.7%

Shared holdings make up 2.4% of IMCV and 2.2% of QGRW.

Level by level

Holdings10 in both1.7%
Sector11 Sectors32.6%
Countryby domicile98.7%
Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in IMCV and QGRW, widest gap first
Sector	More in IMCVMore in QGRW	IMCV	QGRW
Technology	QGRW +46.7 points	6.5%	53.2%
Financials	IMCV +14.7 points	18.5%	3.8%
Communication	QGRW +14.7 points	1.1%	15.8%
Energy	IMCV +12.9 points	13.4%	0.5%
Consumer Staples	IMCV +8.3 points	8.7%	0.4%
Utilities	IMCV +8.2 points	9.0%	0.8%
Health Care	IMCV +6.9 points	12.2%	5.3%
Industrials	IMCV +6.8 points	14.2%	7.4%
Consumer Discretionary	QGRW +6.0 points	6.9%	12.8%
Materials	IMCV +5.0 points	5.0%	0.0%
Real Estate	IMCV +4.6 points	4.6%	0.0%

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in IMCV and QGRW, widest gap first
Country	More in IMCVMore in QGRW	IMCV	QGRW
United States	QGRW +0.8 points	98.7%	99.5%
Other countries (5)	IMCV +0.8 points	1.3%	0.5%

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

IMCV13.2%
QGRW57.2%

Securities held

IMCV268
QGRW100

Asset class

IMCV: Equity
QGRW: Equity

Holdings

Only in IMCV258
In both10
Only in QGRW90

Only in IMCV

258 securities, 97.4% of IMCV by weight

Automatic Data Processing Inc1.60%
Valero Energy Corp1.57%
Phillips 661.54%
Us Bancorp1.27%
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals1.25%
Pnc Financial Services Group1.24%
3M1.23%
Elevance Health Inc1.20%
Eog Resources1.19%
Mondelez International Class A1.14%
Travelers Companies1.13%
United Parcel Service Inc Class B1.11%
Slb1.09%
Moderna1.08%
General Motors1.05%
Cigna1.04%
Hewlett Packard Enterprise1.00%
Target Corp0.96%
Cheniere Energy0.93%
Kinder Morgan0.91%
Marathon Petroleum0.88%
Oneok0.83%
Truist Financial0.82%
Marsh0.82%
Devon Energy0.78%
Sempra0.77%
Dominion Energy0.77%
Aflac0.76%
Becton Dickinson0.74%
Metlife0.73%
Williams0.72%
Delta Air Lines0.72%
Paccar Inc0.69%
Colgate-Palmolive0.69%
Xcel Energy Inc0.68%
PayPal Holdings0.67%
Keurig Dr Pepper Inc0.66%
Ford Motor Co0.66%
Strategy Inc Class A0.65%
Exelon Corp0.65%
Northrop Grumman Corp0.64%
Occidental Petroleum Corp0.64%
Nike Class B0.62%
Iqvia Holdings Inc0.60%
Consolidated Edison0.59%
Norfolk Southern Corp0.59%
American Electric Power Inc0.56%
American International Group0.56%
Prudential Financial Inc0.55%
Sysco0.54%

Only in QGRW

90 securities, 97.8% of QGRW by weight

Nvidia Corp12.00%
Microsoft Corp10.35%
Amazon.com Inc7.05%
Google Inc6.46%
Meta PlatformsInc. Cl A6.18%
Eli Lilly & Co4.06%
Apple Inc3.47%
Broadcom Inc2.81%
Micron Technology Inc2.47%
Advanced Micro Devices2.34%
Visa Inc2.26%
Mastercard Inc1.93%
Palantir Technologies Inc-A1.47%
Marvell Technology Inc1.36%
Cisco Systems Inc1.25%
General Electric Co1.14%
Palo Alto Networks Inc1.06%
Oracle Corp0.99%
Crowdstrike Holdings Inc - A0.96%
Caterpillar Inc0.95%
NetFlix Inc0.94%
Applied Materials Inc0.90%
Lam Research Corp0.88%
GE Vernova Inc0.84%
Salesforce Inc0.84%
Arista Networks Inc0.76%
Qualcomm Inc0.76%
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc0.73%
Intuitive Surgical Inc0.72%
KLA Corp0.66%
Starbucks Corp0.65%
Snowflake Inc-Class A0.61%
Uber Technologies Inc0.61%
Marriott International Inc/DE0.59%
TJX Cos Inc0.58%
Amphenol Corp0.57%
Cintas Corp0.57%
priceline.com Inc0.56%
ServiceNow Inc0.54%
Constellation Energy0.52%
Airbnb Inc-Class A0.51%
Doordash Inc - A0.51%
Quanta Services Inc0.50%
Hansen Natural Corp0.50%
MercadoLibre Inc0.49%
O'Reilly Automotive Inc0.49%
Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc0.48%
Fortinet Inc0.48%
Cloudflare Inc - Class A0.48%
Autodesk Inc0.45%

Weight gaps

All 10 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in IMCV and QGRW, widest gap first
Holding	More in IMCVMore in QGRW	IMCV	QGRW
Workday Class AWDAY	IMCV +0.42 points	0.53%	0.11%
United RentalsURI	QGRW +0.17 points	0.32%	0.49%
Yum BrandsYUM	QGRW +0.16 points	0.20%	0.36%
CorpayCPAY	IMCV +0.10 points	0.18%	0.08%
Nxp Semiconductors NVNXPI	QGRW +0.09 points	0.27%	0.36%
United TherapeuticsUTHR	IMCV +0.07 points	0.13%	0.06%
Ulta Beauty IncULTA	IMCV +0.06 points	0.16%	0.10%
Nextpower IncNXT	IMCV +0.05 points	0.07%	0.02%
First SolarFSLR	IMCV +0.05 points	0.11%	0.06%
Targa ResourcesTRGP	QGRW +0.02 points	0.48%	0.50%

All 268 IMCV holdings⁠All 101 QGRW holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

IMCV vs QGRW Cost

Overpaying QGRW vs IMCV

$4,485

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

IMCV 0.06%
$1,270
QGRW 0.28%
$5,755

Amount$10,000

Years30 years

Cost over time

IMCV 0.06%
QGRW 0.28%
Overpaying

Year by year

Year	IMCV	QGRW	Overpaying
10	$110	$509	$399
20	$432	$1,976	$1,544
30	$1,270	$5,755	$4,485

Expense ratio

0.06%IMCV, cheaper
0.28%QGRW

IMCV0.06%QGRW0.28%

0.04%1.01%

Middle half of US Multifactor funds
Median 0.29%

IMCV 4th cheapest of 99 funds

QGRW 41st cheapest of 99 funds

IMCV vs QGRW Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026

Yield (12M): IMCV 1.83%, better; QGRW 0.08%
Payout (12M): IMCV $1.83; QGRW $0.05
Last payment: IMCV $0.52; QGRW $0.05
Ex-dividend: IMCV Sep 15, 2026; QGRW Dec 26, 2025
Paid on: IMCV Sep 18, 2026; QGRW Dec 30, 2025
Frequency: IMCV Quarterly; QGRW Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

IMCVQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll IMCV payments⁠

QGRWAnnual · 3 paymentsAll QGRW payments⁠

IMCV vs QGRW Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years: IMCV 13.6%, betterQGRW 18.3%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years: IMCV 1.22, betterQGRW 1.19
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years: IMCV −19.9%QGRW −24.4%since Dec 2022
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years: IMCV 0.87QGRW 1.33; Market = 1

Popular comparisons

IMCVAvsVONVA
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF · Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF
Expense ratio
0.06% · 0.06%
Category
QGRWCvsVONVA
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund · Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF
Expense ratio
0.28% · 0.06%
Category
IMCVAvsILCVA
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF · iShares Morningstar Value ETF
Expense ratio
0.06% · 0.04%
Category
QGRWCvsILCVA
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund · iShares Morningstar Value ETF
Expense ratio
0.28% · 0.04%
Category
IMCVAvsVYMA
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF · Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Expense ratio
0.06% · 0.04%
Category
QGRWCvsVYMA
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund · Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Expense ratio
0.28% · 0.04%
Category