VONV ranks 1st and QGRW 56th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
QGRW vs VONV
VONV −0.22pt a year
0.28%0.06%
VONV 3.0×the volume
259K774K
QGRW +3.3pt
+25.6%+22.3%
QGRW vs VONV Performance
+6.6%+28.9%
- QGRW 0.28%
- VONV 0.06%, better
- QGRW $3.13B
- VONV $23.3B
- QGRW +6.6%
- VONV +28.9%, better
- QGRW 0.08%
- VONV 1.53%, better
- QGRW 101
- VONV 887
- QGRW 259K sh
- VONV 774K sh, better
- QGRW $64.55
- VONV $113.44
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QGRW | VONV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B55 | A96Higher |
| Mission | B62 | A100Higher |
| Risk | F22 | A86Higher |
| Tradability | A84Higher | B60 |
| Holdings | F22 | C49Higher |
| Durability | C54 | A93Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. QGRW and VONV are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QGRWC
VONVA
In short
QGRW Most growth funds buy the entire growth half of the market. QGRW ranks the 500 biggest US companies on growth and profitability, equal weight to each, and keeps only the top 100 scorers. Concentrated on purpose.
VONV The plain-vanilla value trade, done cheap: about 900 large US value stocks, full replication of the Russell 1000 Value Index, 0.06% a year. No factor cocktail, no premium price tag, and one of the strongest implementations in its factor peer group.
Stated mandate
QGRW The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Index.
VONV The fund seeks to track the Russell 1000 Value Index, representing large-capitalization value stocks in the United States. It uses passive indexing and full replication to remain closely aligned with that benchmark.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QGRW vs VONV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QGRW vs VONV Cost
Overpaying QGRW vs VONV
$4,485
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QGRW 0.28%
$5,755
VONV 0.06%
$1,270
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QGRW | VONV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $509 | $110 | $399 |
| 20 | $1,976 | $432 | $1,544 |
| 30 | $5,755 | $1,270 | $4,485 |
- 0.28%QGRW
- 0.06%VONV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
VONV 4th cheapest of 99 funds
QGRW 41st cheapest of 99 funds
QGRW vs VONV Dividends
- QGRW 0.08%
- VONV 1.53%, better
- QGRW $0.05
- VONV $1.74
- QGRW $0.05
- VONV $0.42
- QGRW Dec 26, 2025
- VONV Sep 23, 2026
- QGRW Dec 30, 2025
- VONV Sep 25, 2026
- QGRW Annual
- VONV Quarterly
Distribution history
QGRW vs VONV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QGRW 18.3%VONV 12.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- QGRW 1.19VONV 1.43, better
- Worst fall
- QGRW −24.4%VONV −18.9%
- Market sensitivity
- QGRW 1.33VONV 0.85
QGRW and VONV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.28% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.28% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.28% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

