VYM ranks 2nd and QGRW 56th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
QGRW vs VYM
VYM −0.24pt a year
0.28%0.04%
VYM 4.4×the volume
259K1.14M
QGRW +5.6pt
+25.6%+20.0%
QGRW vs VYM Performance
+6.6%+19.4%
- QGRW 0.28%
- VYM 0.04%, better
- QGRW $3.13B
- VYM $95.8B
- QGRW +6.6%
- VYM +19.4%, better
- QGRW 0.08%
- VYM 2.24%, better
- QGRW 101
- VYM 610
- QGRW 259K sh
- VYM 1.14M sh, better
- QGRW $64.55
- VYM $163.75
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QGRW | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B55 | A99Higher |
| Mission | B62 | A79Higher |
| Risk | F22 | A85Higher |
| Tradability | A84Higher | B61 |
| Holdings | F22 | C53Higher |
| Durability | C54 | A95Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. QGRW and VYM are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QGRWC
VYMA
In short
QGRW Most growth funds buy the entire growth half of the market. QGRW ranks the 500 biggest US companies on growth and profitability, equal weight to each, and keeps only the top 100 scorers. Concentrated on purpose.
VYM The no-frills dividend workhorse. VYM buys the higher-yielding end of the US market, roughly 600 names, for four basis points: no quality screen, no dividend-growth-streak test, just yield, at scale since 2006.
Stated mandate
QGRW The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Index.
VYM The Fund seeks to track a benchmark index measuring the investment return of common stocks from companies characterized by high dividend yields.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QGRW vs VYM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QGRW vs VYM Cost
Overpaying QGRW vs VYM
$4,906
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QGRW 0.28%
$5,755
VYM 0.04%
$849
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QGRW | VYM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $509 | $73 | $436 |
| 20 | $1,976 | $288 | $1,688 |
| 30 | $5,755 | $849 | $4,906 |
- 0.28%QGRW
- 0.04%VYM, cheaper
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
VYM cheapest of 99 funds
QGRW 41st cheapest of 99 funds
QGRW vs VYM Dividends
- QGRW 0.08%
- VYM 2.24%, better
- QGRW $0.05
- VYM $3.68
- QGRW $0.05
- VYM $0.89
- QGRW Dec 26, 2025
- VYM Sep 18, 2026
- QGRW Dec 30, 2025
- VYM Sep 22, 2026
- QGRW Annual
- VYM Quarterly
Distribution history
QGRW vs VYM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QGRW 18.3%VYM 11.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- QGRW 1.19VYM 1.38, better
- Worst fall
- QGRW −24.4%VYM −15.9%
- Market sensitivity
- QGRW 1.33VYM 0.74
QGRW and VYM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.28% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.28% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.28% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.



