SCHZ ranks 2nd and IMTB 17th of 114 funds in the US Aggregate Bond Category.
IMTB vs SCHZ
SCHZ −0.04pt a year
0.07%0.03%
SCHZ 35.5×the volume
66.7K2.37M
IMTB +0.6pt
+0.4%−0.2%
IMTB vs SCHZ Performance
+1.9%−1.0%
- IMTB 0.07%
- SCHZ 0.03%, better
- IMTB $283M
- SCHZ $10.8B
- IMTB −0.1%, better
- SCHZ −0.2%
- IMTB 4.64%, better
- SCHZ 4.27%
- IMTB 3598
- SCHZ 12610
- IMTB 66.7K sh
- SCHZ 2.37M sh, better
- IMTB $42.29
- SCHZ $22.54
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IMTB | SCHZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A88 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A99 | A100Higher |
| Risk | C44 | C47Higher |
| Tradability | B58 | A85Higher |
| Holdings | B65 | A78Higher |
| Durability | B66 | A88Higher |
Rank among US Aggregate Bond funds
Same Category. IMTB and SCHZ are both graded against the same 114 US Aggregate Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IMTBA
SCHZA
In short
IMTB Most core bond funds hand you the entire yield curve. IMTB takes only the 5-to-10-year belly, and its index reaches past the Agg into high yield, for seven basis points a year.
SCHZ Schwab's core bond holding: the broad U.S. investment-grade bond market, over 10,000 issues deep, for 0.03% a year. That is the floor of a category whose median fee is more than ten times higher. Running since 2011, pays monthly.
Stated mandate
IMTB The fund seeks to track an index of U.S.-dollar-denominated investment-grade and high-yield bonds with remaining maturities between five and ten years.
SCHZ The fund seeks to track the total return of an index representing the broad U.S. investment-grade bond market.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IMTB vs SCHZ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IMTB vs SCHZ Cost
Overpaying IMTB vs SCHZ
$842
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IMTB 0.07%
$1,480
SCHZ 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IMTB | SCHZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $128 | $55 | $73 |
| 20 | $503 | $216 | $287 |
| 30 | $1,480 | $638 | $842 |
- 0.07%IMTB
- 0.03%SCHZ, cheaper
- Middle half of US Aggregate Bond funds
- Median 0.34%
SCHZ 2nd cheapest of 114 funds
IMTB 12th cheapest of 114 funds
IMTB vs SCHZ Dividends
- IMTB 4.64%, better
- SCHZ 4.27%
- IMTB $1.96
- SCHZ $0.96
- IMTB $0.17
- SCHZ $0.08
- IMTB Oct 1, 2026
- SCHZ Oct 1, 2026
- IMTB Oct 6, 2026
- SCHZ Oct 7, 2026
- IMTB Monthly
- SCHZ Monthly
Distribution history
IMTB vs SCHZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- IMTB
- SCHZ
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IMTB 6.2%SCHZ 5.6%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- IMTB 0.31, betterSCHZ 0.17
- Worst fall
- IMTB −17.4%, betterSCHZ −17.5%
- Market sensitivity
- IMTB 1.05SCHZ 0.99
IMTB and SCHZ in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.07% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
