Skip to content

INCE vs NDAA

Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF

INCEANYSE Arca

Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF

NDAABNasdaq

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

INCE −0.36pt a year

INCE0.29%NDAA0.65%

Avg volume · 30D

INCE 3.4×the volume

INCE47.3KNDAA13.8K

INCE vs NDAA Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+22.6%INCE+9.5%NDAA

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. INCE +22.6%. NDAA +9.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%5%15%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
INCE 0.29%, better
NDAA 0.65%
Fund size
INCE $368M
NDAA $195M
1Y total return
INCE +22.6%, better
NDAA +9.5%
Yield (12M)
INCE 5.28%, better
NDAA 2.48%
Holdings
INCE 112
NDAA 26
Avg volume (30D)
INCE 47.3K sh, better
NDAA 13.8K sh
NAV per share
INCE $68.80
NDAA $23.68
52W range

ETF.net Grade

INCE: Cost 82, Risk 64, Mission not scored, Tradability 65, Holdings 74, Durability 85. NDAA: Cost 44, Risk 46, Mission 81, Tradability 41, Holdings 65, Durability 54.
Pillar letters and Scores for INCE, NDAA, with each pillar’s weight
PillarINCENDAA
Cost30% weightA82HigherC44
Mission25% weightNot scoredA81
Risk15% weightB64HigherC46
Tradability15% weightB65HigherC41
Holdings10% weightA74HigherB65
Durability5% weightA85HigherC54

Rank among Multi-Asset Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. INCE and NDAA are both graded against the same 37 Multi-Asset Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Multi-Asset Allocation⁠

Category · 37 funds
See all 37 ›

INCE ranks 4th and NDAA 17th of 37 funds in the Multi-Asset Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AUCBGState Street SPDR UC Investments 90/10 Endowment Strategy Index ETFScore 95
  2. Rank 2AAOAiShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETFScore 88
  3. Rank 3AIRTRiShares LifePath Retirement ETFScore 86
  4. Rank 4AINCEFranklin Income Equity Focus ETFScore 74
  5. Rank 5AGAACambria Global Asset Allocation ETFScore 71
  6. Rank 16BRAAXVanEck Real Assets ETFScore 57
  7. Rank 17BNDAANed Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETFScore 55
  8. Rank 18CDRSKAptus Defined Risk ETFScore 54

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

INCEAFranklin Income Equity Focus ETF

NDAABNed Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF

In short

INCE Franklin's income playbook run through stocks instead of bonds: roughly 100 equity-focused positions, monthly payouts, and an objective that targets lower volatility than the S&P 500, at a fee well under the typical allocation fund.

NDAA A research house best known for selling market indicators now runs money with them. NDAA is an actively managed fund of ETFs built on Ned Davis Research's 360 Approach, anchored at 60% global stocks and 40% global bonds but free to move well off that mix.

Stated mandate

INCE The Fund seeks income from equity securities and related instruments while also pursuing capital appreciation and lower volatility than the S&P 500 Index.

NDAA The Fund is actively managed and uses Ned Davis Research’s 360° Approach to allocate dynamically among equity, fixed-income and commodity ETFs and money markets. Its stated allocation framework targets 60% global equities and 40% global bonds but can move materially away from that mix.

Why people hold it

  • INCE 0.29% a year, less than half what the typical allocation fund charges.
  • Income is the job, and it shows up monthly. The mandate also lets managers move across debt and equity markets rather than sit in one lane.
  • The stated goal is not yield alone: income, capital appreciation, and lower volatility than the S&P 500 are all written into the objective.
  • Undercuts its multi-asset sibling INCM (0.38%) on fee, and sits among the stronger names in a crowded allocation field.
  • NDAA One ticket for a global mix: the fund allocates across equity, fixed-income and commodity ETFs plus money markets, rather than a single asset class.
  • The 60/40 baseline is a starting point, not a cage. The manager can shift materially away from it as its indicators change.
  • At 0.65%, it undercuts the typical fund in the allocation cohort, where the median runs 0.78%. Cheap for discretionary tactical management.

Worth knowing

  • INCE Small and lightly traded next to the giants of its category, so spreads can widen. Limit orders are the norm here.
  • Distributions may include return of capital, so part of a monthly payout can be your own money coming back.
  • Equity-forward by design. The aim is a smoother ride than the S&P 500, not bond-like steadiness.
  • NDAA Index-based allocation peers cost far less: AOA charges 0.19% and IRTR 0.08%. You are paying up for the active calls, not the building blocks.
  • Small and thinly traded. Spreads can be wide, so limit orders matter more here than in a mega-cap index fund.
  • Launched in 2024, so the strategy has not yet been tested across a full market cycle in this wrapper. Distributions come annually or semiannually, not monthly.

Full INCE profile⁠

Full NDAA profile⁠

INCE vs NDAA Holdings

How INCE and NDAA differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of INCE and 0.0% of NDAA.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Countryby domicile80.0%

Sector

No Sector split for NDAA.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in INCE and NDAA, widest gap first
CountryMore in INCEMore in NDAA
United StatesINCE +16.5 points
JapanNDAA +8.3 points
TaiwanNDAA +2.0 points
FranceINCE +1.9 points
SwitzerlandINCE +1.5 points
South KoreaNDAA +1.3 points
CanadaNDAA +1.3 points
ChinaNDAA +1.1 points
Other countries (30)NDAA +5.9 points

Outside the US: NDAA 69% developed, 31% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • INCE26.1%
  • NDAA67.5%

Securities held

  • INCE104
  • NDAA26

Asset class

INCE
Equity
NDAA
Multi-Asset

Holdings

  • Only in INCE104
  • In both0
  • Only in NDAA26

Only in INCE

104 securities, 98.7% of INCE by weight

  • Chevron Corp3.86%
  • JPMorgan Chase & Co2.95%
  • Morgan Stanley Eln 10/272.87%

Only in NDAA

26 securities, 100% of NDAA by weight

  • State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF11.69%
  • State Street SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF10.16%
  • abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF6.97%

Weight gaps

INCE and NDAA share no securities.

All 113 INCE holdings⁠All NDAA holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

INCE vs NDAA Cost

Overpaying NDAA vs INCE

$6,765

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • INCE 0.29%

    $5,952

  • NDAA 0.65%

    $12,717

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • INCE 0.29%
  • NDAA 0.65%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530NDAA $12,717INCE $5,952

Year by year

YearINCENDAAOverpaying
10$527$1,163$636
20$2,044$4,440$2,396
30$5,952$12,717$6,765

Expense ratio

  • 0.29%INCE, cheaper
  • 0.65%NDAA
  • Middle half of Multi-Asset Allocation funds
  • Median 0.57%

INCE 7th cheapest of 37 funds

NDAA 20th cheapest of 37 funds

INCE vs NDAA Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
INCE 5.28%, better
NDAA 2.48%
Payout (12M)
INCE $3.64
NDAA $0.59
Last payment
INCE $0.30
NDAA $0.59
Ex-dividend
INCE Oct 30, 2026
NDAA Dec 23, 2025
Paid on
INCE Pays Nov 4, 2026
NDAA Dec 24, 2025
Frequency
INCE Monthly
NDAA Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

INCEMonthly · 34 paymentsAll INCE payments⁠
One bar per payment. 34 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Mar 17, 2023 $0.12; Jun 16, 2023 $0.14; Sep 15, 2023 $0.24; Dec 15, 2023 $0.40; Mar 15, 2024 $0.16; Jun 28, 2024 $0.34; Jul 31, 2024 $0.17; Aug 30, 2024 $0.25; Sep 30, 2024 $0.20; Oct 31, 2024 $0.22; Nov 29, 2024 $0.23; Dec 31, 2024 $0.25; Jan 31, 2025 $0.20; Feb 28, 2025 $0.24; Mar 31, 2025 $0.27; Apr 30, 2025 $0.23; May 30, 2025 $0.27; Jun 30, 2025 $0.24; Jul 31, 2025 $0.21; Aug 29, 2025 $0.26; Sep 30, 2025 $0.29; Oct 31, 2025 $0.22; Nov 28, 2025 $0.23; Dec 30, 2025 $0.22; Jan 30, 2026 $0.29; Feb 27, 2026 $0.30; Mar 31, 2026 $0.35; Apr 30, 2026 $0.34; May 29, 2026 $0.25; Jun 30, 2026 $0.25; Jul 31, 2026 $0.30; Aug 31, 2026 $0.30; Sep 30, 2026 $0.30; Oct 30, 2026 $0.30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD
NDAAAnnual · 2 paymentsAll NDAA payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 26, 2024 $0.16; Dec 23, 2025 $0.59. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD

INCE vs NDAA Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
INCE 10.8%NDAA 9.8%since Nov 2024
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
INCE 1.28NDAA 0.77since Nov 2024
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
INCE −18.4%NDAA −13.5%since Oct 2024
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
INCE 0.60NDAA 0.73

Popular comparisons

  • INCEAvsUCBGA

    Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF · State Street SPDR UC Investments 90/10 Endowment Strategy Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.29% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NDAABvsUCBGA

    Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF · State Street SPDR UC Investments 90/10 Endowment Strategy Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • INCEAvsAOAA

    Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF · iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.29% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NDAABvsAOAA

    Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF · iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • INCEAvsIRTRA

    Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF · iShares LifePath Retirement ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.29% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NDAABvsIRTRA

    Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF · iShares LifePath Retirement ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.