IRTR ranks 3rd and NDAA 17th of 37 funds in the Multi-Asset Allocation Category.
IRTR vs NDAA
IRTR −0.57pt a year
0.08%0.65%
NDAA 1.1×the volume
12.7K13.8K
IRTR vs NDAA Performance
+5.1%+9.5%
- IRTR 0.08%, better
- NDAA 0.65%
- IRTR $60M
- NDAA $195M
- IRTR +5.1%
- NDAA +9.5%, better
- IRTR 3.17%, better
- NDAA 2.48%
- IRTR 29140
- NDAA 26
- IRTR 12.7K sh
- NDAA 13.8K sh, better
- IRTR $31.52
- NDAA $23.68
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IRTR | NDAA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | C44 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A81 |
| Risk | A82Higher | C46 |
| Tradability | B62Higher | C41 |
| Holdings | A80Higher | B65 |
| Durability | B56Higher | C54 |
Rank among Multi-Asset Allocation funds
Same Category. IRTR and NDAA are both graded against the same 37 Multi-Asset Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IRTRA
NDAAB
In short
IRTR A whole retirement portfolio in one ticker: global stock and bond ETFs blended at the conservative end, for 0.08% a year. That is index-fund pricing on a job most allocation funds charge roughly ten times more to do.
NDAA A research house best known for selling market indicators now runs money with them. NDAA is an actively managed fund of ETFs built on Ned Davis Research's 360 Approach, anchored at 60% global stocks and 40% global bonds but free to move well off that mix.
Stated mandate
IRTR The fund seeks conservative exposure through a broad portfolio of stock and bond ETFs spanning global asset classes.
NDAA The Fund is actively managed and uses Ned Davis Research’s 360° Approach to allocate dynamically among equity, fixed-income and commodity ETFs and money markets. Its stated allocation framework targets 60% global equities and 40% global bonds but can move materially away from that mix.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IRTR vs NDAA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IRTR vs NDAA Cost
Overpaying NDAA vs IRTR
$11,028
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IRTR 0.08%
$1,689
NDAA 0.65%
$12,717
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IRTR | NDAA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $147 | $1,163 | $1,016 |
| 20 | $575 | $4,440 | $3,865 |
| 30 | $1,689 | $12,717 | $11,028 |
- 0.08%IRTR, cheaper
- 0.65%NDAA
- Middle half of Multi-Asset Allocation funds
- Median 0.57%
IRTR 2nd cheapest of 37 funds
NDAA 20th cheapest of 37 funds
IRTR vs NDAA Dividends
- IRTR 3.17%, better
- NDAA 2.48%
- IRTR $1.00
- NDAA $0.59
- IRTR $0.08
- NDAA $0.59
- IRTR Oct 2, 2026
- NDAA Dec 23, 2025
- IRTR Oct 7, 2026
- NDAA Dec 24, 2025
- IRTR Monthly
- NDAA Annual
Distribution history
IRTR vs NDAA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IRTR 7.3%NDAA 9.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- IRTR 1.14NDAA 0.77
- Worst fall
- IRTR −6.3%NDAA −13.5%
- Market sensitivity
- IRTR 0.47NDAA 0.73
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.