QLD ranks 1st and INDL 79th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
INDL vs QLD
QLD −0.34pt a year
1.23%0.89%
QLD 269.1×the volume
15.4K4.15M
QLD +34.2pt
−2.3%+31.9%
INDL vs QLD Performance
−27.4%+97.9%
- INDL 1.23%
- QLD 0.89%, better
- INDL $53M
- QLD $13.3B
- INDL −28.1%
- QLD +10.7%, better
- INDL 1.26%, better
- QLD 0.15%
- INDL 8
- QLD 113
- INDL 15.4K sh
- QLD 4.15M sh, better
- INDL $40.50
- QLD $82.56
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | INDL | QLD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F11 | A72Higher |
| Mission | A95 | |
| Risk | C40 | B66Higher |
| Tradability | B62 | A100Higher |
| Holdings | A72 | |
| Durability | B66 | A81Higher |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. INDL and QLD are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
INDLD
QLDA
In short
INDL Most leveraged ETFs double down on the Dow or the Nasdaq. INDL aims a 2x daily multiplier at India instead, tracking the MSCI India Index since 2010. Built as a single-day trading tool, not a long-term India position.
QLD The 2x dial on the Nasdaq-100. QLD aims for twice the index's daily move, half the dose of the 3x crowd, and it has been running that playbook since 2006. The multiple resets every session.
Stated mandate
INDL The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the MSCI India Index before fees and expenses, with the objective applying for a single day.
QLD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to twice the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
INDL vs QLD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
INDL vs QLD Cost
Overpaying INDL vs QLD
$5,439
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
INDL 1.23%
$22,311
QLD 0.89%
$16,872
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | INDL | QLD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,148 | $1,576 | $572 |
| 20 | $7,989 | $5,953 | $2,036 |
| 30 | $22,311 | $16,872 | $5,439 |
- 1.23%INDL
- 0.89%QLD, cheaper
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
QLD 28th cheapest of 95 funds
INDL 88th cheapest of 95 funds
INDL vs QLD Dividends
- INDL 1.26%, better
- QLD 0.15%
- INDL $0.52
- QLD $0.12
- INDL $0.09
- QLD $0.03
- INDL Sep 22, 2026
- QLD Sep 23, 2026
- INDL Sep 29, 2026
- QLD Sep 29, 2026
- INDL Quarterly
- QLD Quarterly
Distribution history
INDL vs QLD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- INDL
- QLD
Risk facts
- Volatility
- INDL 26.9%, betterQLD 36.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- INDL −0.10QLD 1.04, better
- Worst fall
- INDL −49.4%, betterQLD −63.7%
- Market sensitivity
- INDL 0.77QLD 2.46
INDL and QLD in the news
Popular comparisons
- 1.23% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.23% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.23% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
