INTF ranks 1st and JPIN 16th of 30 funds in the International Multifactor Category.
INTF vs JPIN
INTF −0.21pt a year
0.16%0.37%
INTF 23.4×the volume
309K13.2K
INTF +1.4pt
+9.3%+7.9%
INTF vs JPIN Performance
+65.8%+52.3%
- INTF 0.16%, better
- JPIN 0.37%
- INTF $3.7B
- JPIN $385M
- INTF +17.0%, better
- JPIN +14.8%
- INTF 3.02%
- JPIN 4.25%, better
- INTF 501
- JPIN 465
- INTF 309K sh, better
- JPIN 13.2K sh
- INTF $41.10
- JPIN $74.09
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | INTF | JPIN |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A98Higher | C40 |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | B55Higher | C51 |
| Tradability | A73Higher | D36 |
| Holdings | B68 | A77Higher |
| Durability | A86Higher | B64 |
Rank among International Multifactor funds
Same Category. INTF and JPIN are both graded against the same 30 International Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
INTFA
JPINC
In short
INTF Five factors at once (value, quality, momentum, low volatility, low size) aimed at developed markets outside the US, for 0.16% a year. That is well under half what the typical international multifactor fund charges.
JPIN A deliberate break from the cap-weighted international index: roughly 500 foreign stocks screened on value, quality and momentum, assembled with better risk-adjusted returns as the stated goal. J.P. Morgan has run it since 2014.
Stated mandate
INTF The fund seeks to track an index of international developed-market stocks chosen using value, quality, momentum, low-volatility, and low-size factors.
JPIN The fund seeks international equity exposure while aiming for better risk-adjusted returns than a market-cap-weighted index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
INTF vs JPIN Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
INTF vs JPIN Cost
Overpaying JPIN vs INTF
$4,171
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
INTF 0.16%
$3,342
JPIN 0.37%
$7,513
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | INTF | JPIN | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $292 | $670 | $378 |
| 20 | $1,141 | $2,590 | $1,449 |
| 30 | $3,342 | $7,513 | $4,171 |
- 0.16%INTF, cheaper
- 0.37%JPIN
- Middle half of International Multifactor funds
- Median 0.34%
INTF 2nd cheapest of 30 funds
JPIN 18th cheapest of 30 funds
INTF vs JPIN Dividends
- INTF 3.02%
- JPIN 4.25%, better
- INTF $1.24
- JPIN $3.14
- INTF $0.72
- JPIN $0.51
- INTF Jun 15, 2026
- JPIN Sep 22, 2026
- INTF Jun 18, 2026
- JPIN Sep 24, 2026
- INTF Twice a year
- JPIN Quarterly
Distribution history
INTF vs JPIN Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- INTF
- JPIN
Risk facts
- Volatility
- INTF 11.2%, betterJPIN 11.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- INTF 1.45, betterJPIN 1.21
- Worst fall
- INTF −27.6%, betterJPIN −27.7%
- Market sensitivity
- INTF 0.74JPIN 0.84
Popular comparisons
- 0.16% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.37% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.37% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.37% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.