IQSZ ranks 2nd and ERTH 5th of 8 funds in the Climate & Sustainability Category.
ERTH vs IQSZ
IQSZ −0.46pt a year
0.65%0.19%
ERTH 2.6×the volume
3.92K1.5K
ERTH vs IQSZ Performance
−13.8%+16.2%
- ERTH 0.65%
- IQSZ 0.19%, better
- ERTH $119M
- IQSZ $169M
- ERTH −13.8%
- IQSZ +16.2%, better
- ERTH 2.04%, better
- IQSZ 1.93%
- ERTH 185
- IQSZ 472
- ERTH 3.92K sh, better
- IQSZ 1.5K sh
- ERTH $40.97
- IQSZ $31.37
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ERTH | IQSZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D33 | A83Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D35 | A75Higher |
| Tradability | B68Higher | D31 |
| Holdings | C54 | A75Higher |
| Durability | B69Higher | B65 |
Rank among Climate & Sustainability funds
Same Category. ERTH and IQSZ are both graded against the same 8 Climate & Sustainability funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ERTHC
IQSZB
In short
ERTH Born in 2006 as a cleantech fund, ERTH now tracks MSCI's six-theme environment index, from alternative energy to green building to sustainable water. Fee: 0.65% net of a waiver through August 31, 2028.
IQSZ Active net-zero investing priced like an index fund: 0.19% for a global, roughly 500-stock portfolio where a quant process weighs momentum, quality and value alongside a company's emissions plans.
Stated mandate
ERTH The fund seeks to provide exposure to companies addressing multiple environmental-impact themes, including alternative energy, energy efficiency, green building, and sustainable water.
IQSZ Seeks long-term total return. It actively invests at least 80% of assets in equity securities of companies judged to support the transition to a net-zero economy through current or planned greenhouse-gas reductions, primarily among large- and mid-cap companies in developed and emerging markets.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ERTH vs IQSZ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ERTH vs IQSZ Cost
Overpaying ERTH vs IQSZ
$8,765
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ERTH 0.65%
$12,717
IQSZ 0.19%
$3,952
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ERTH | IQSZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,163 | $347 | $816 |
| 20 | $4,440 | $1,351 | $3,089 |
| 30 | $12,717 | $3,952 | $8,765 |
- 0.65%ERTH
- 0.19%IQSZ, cheaper
- Middle half of Climate & Sustainability funds
- Median 0.48%
IQSZ 2nd cheapest of 8 funds
ERTH 6th cheapest of 8 funds
ERTH vs IQSZ Dividends
- ERTH 2.04%, better
- IQSZ 1.93%
- ERTH $0.83
- IQSZ $0.60
- ERTH $0.15
- IQSZ $0.13
- ERTH Sep 21, 2026
- IQSZ Sep 21, 2026
- ERTH Sep 25, 2026
- IQSZ Sep 25, 2026
- ERTH Quarterly
- IQSZ Quarterly
Distribution history
ERTH vs IQSZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ERTH 17.9%IQSZ 11.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- ERTH −0.004IQSZ 1.41
- Worst fall
- ERTH −51.7%IQSZ −9.1%
- Market sensitivity
- ERTH 1.12IQSZ 0.90
Popular comparisons
- 0.65% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.