KLMT ranks 1st and ERTH 5th of 8 funds in the Climate & Sustainability Category.
ERTH vs KLMT
KLMT −0.55pt a year
0.65%0.10%
ERTH 2.3×the volume
3.92K1.72K
ERTH vs KLMT Performance
−13.8%+12.4%
- ERTH 0.65%
- KLMT 0.10%, better
- ERTH $119M
- KLMT $1.55B
- ERTH −13.8%
- KLMT +12.4%, better
- ERTH 2.04%, better
- KLMT 1.82%
- ERTH 185
- KLMT 503
- ERTH 3.92K sh, better
- KLMT 1.72K sh
- ERTH $40.97
- KLMT $34.14
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ERTH | KLMT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D33 | A93Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D35 | A75Higher |
| Tradability | B68Higher | D35 |
| Holdings | C54 | A72Higher |
| Durability | B69 | A70Higher |
Rank among Climate & Sustainability funds
Same Category. ERTH and KLMT are both graded against the same 8 Climate & Sustainability funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ERTHC
KLMTA
In short
ERTH Born in 2006 as a cleantech fund, ERTH now tracks MSCI's six-theme environment index, from alternative energy to green building to sustainable water. Fee: 0.65% net of a waiver through August 31, 2028.
KLMT A climate fund that behaves like a core global index fund: roughly 500 developed and emerging market stocks, full replication, and a 0.10% fee that undercuts most of the thematic aisle.
Stated mandate
ERTH The fund seeks to provide exposure to companies addressing multiple environmental-impact themes, including alternative energy, energy efficiency, green building, and sustainable water.
KLMT The Fund seeks to track the investment results of the MSCI ACWI Select Climate 500 Index before fees and expenses, using full replication of the index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ERTH vs KLMT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ERTH vs KLMT Cost
Overpaying ERTH vs KLMT
$10,611
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ERTH 0.65%
$12,717
KLMT 0.10%
$2,106
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ERTH | KLMT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,163 | $183 | $980 |
| 20 | $4,440 | $717 | $3,723 |
| 30 | $12,717 | $2,106 | $10,611 |
- 0.65%ERTH
- 0.10%KLMT, cheaper
- Middle half of Climate & Sustainability funds
- Median 0.48%
KLMT cheapest of 8 funds
ERTH 6th cheapest of 8 funds
ERTH vs KLMT Dividends
- ERTH 2.04%, better
- KLMT 1.82%
- ERTH $0.83
- KLMT $0.62
- ERTH $0.15
- KLMT $0.14
- ERTH Sep 21, 2026
- KLMT Sep 21, 2026
- ERTH Sep 25, 2026
- KLMT Sep 25, 2026
- ERTH Quarterly
- KLMT Quarterly
Distribution history
ERTH vs KLMT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ERTH 17.9%KLMT 10.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- ERTH −0.004KLMT 1.08
- Worst fall
- ERTH −51.7%KLMT −16.9%
- Market sensitivity
- ERTH 1.12KLMT 0.89
Popular comparisons
- 0.65% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.