Skip to content
etf.net

ITDB vs ITDF

iShares LifePath Target Date 2030 ETF

ITDBANYSE Arca

iShares LifePath Target Date 2050 ETF

ITDFBNYSE Arca

Overlap

No data

Expense ratio

ITDB −0.02pt a year

ITDB0.09%ITDF0.11%

Avg volume · 30D

ITDB 1.4×the volume

ITDB15.7KITDF11.6K

3Y return · a year

ITDF +6.9pt

ITDB+14.3%ITDF+21.2%

ITDB vs ITDF Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+6.6%ITDB+11.8%ITDF

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. ITDB +6.6%. ITDF +11.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%15%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
ITDB 0.09%, better
ITDF 0.11%
Fund size
ITDB $83M
ITDF $99M
1Y total return
ITDB +6.6%
ITDF +11.8%, better
Yield (12M)
ITDB 1.94%, better
ITDF 1.49%
Holdings
ITDB 29196
ITDF 19965
Avg volume (30D)
ITDB 15.7K sh, better
ITDF 11.6K sh
NAV per share
ITDB $34.81
ITDF $41.08
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ITDB: Cost 89, Risk 67, Mission 100, Tradability 55, Holdings 73, Durability 65. ITDF: Cost 46, Risk 42, Mission 100, Tradability 44, Holdings 53, Durability 65.
Pillar letters and Scores for ITDB, ITDF, with each pillar’s weight
PillarITDBITDF
Cost30% weightA89HigherC46
Mission25% weightA100A100
Risk15% weightB67HigherC42
Tradability15% weightB55HigherC44
Holdings10% weightA73HigherC53
Durability5% weightB65B65

Rank among Target Date funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ITDB and ITDF are both graded against the same 9 Target Date funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Target Date⁠

Category · 9 funds
See all 9 ›

ITDB ranks 2nd and ITDF 7th of 9 funds in the Target Date Category.

  1. Rank 1AITDCiShares LifePath Target Date 2035 ETFScore 83
  2. Rank 2AITDBiShares LifePath Target Date 2030 ETFScore 80
  3. Rank 3BITDDiShares LifePath Target Date 2040 ETFScore 69
  4. Rank 6BITDHiShares LifePath Target Date 2060 ETFScore 61
  5. Rank 7BITDFiShares LifePath Target Date 2050 ETFScore 60
  6. Rank 8BITDIiShares LifePath Target Date 2065 ETFScore 59

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ITDBAiShares LifePath Target Date 2030 ETF

ITDFBiShares LifePath Target Date 2050 ETF

In short

ITDB The 401(k) staple, unbundled. One ticker holds a global basket of iShares funds and walks down a preset glide path toward 2030, from the suite that first brought target-date investing out of workplace plans and onto an exchange.

ITDF The 401(k) staple in ETF form: one ticker holding a global basket of iShares funds, on a glide path that dials risk down as 2050 approaches. Charges 0.11% a year.

Stated mandate

ITDB The Fund seeks retirement outcomes through a broad portfolio of ETFs. It reallocates among underlying funds using a predetermined glide path that becomes more conservative as the target date approaches.

ITDF The fund seeks retirement outcomes through a diversified portfolio of ETFs whose allocation changes as the 2050 target date approaches.

Why people hold it

  • ITDB 0.09% a year, below the median for target-date ETFs, for a whole diversified portfolio you never rebalance by hand.
  • One decision, not twelve: a global mix of underlying iShares ETFs that reallocates on a predetermined glide path, growing more conservative as 2030 approaches.
  • Launched October 2023 in the first US suite of target-date ETFs, so the format lives in a brokerage account instead of only inside an employer plan.yahoo.com
  • ITDF One ticker, a diversified portfolio of ETFs spanning global markets, with the mix shifting on a schedule tied to 2050 rather than to your attention span.
  • 0.11% a year, sitting right at the median for target-date funds, for a multi-asset portfolio that would take a half-dozen tickers to assemble by hand.
  • Target-date structure without a retirement plan menu: it is a 1940 Act ETF that trades intraday in an ordinary brokerage account.
  • Part of a full dated LifePath lineup, from the 2035 vintage (ITDC) out to 2070 (ITDJ), so the retirement horizon you want exists as a sibling ticker.

Worth knowing

  • ITDB Thinly traded with a modest asset base next to headline index ETFs, so spreads can be wider and order type matters more.
  • No outside benchmark to grade it against. BlackRock sets the glide path, so the stock/bond mix reflects its own house view.
  • At the target date the fund is designed to transition into the iShares LifePath Retirement ETF, so holding past 2030 means holding a different vehicle.yahoo.com
  • ITDF Thinly traded with a modest asset base, so bid/ask spreads can run wider than on household-name ETFs, especially around the open and close.
  • The glide path is the manager's call. You cannot tune the stock/bond mix, and it de-risks on the 2050 calendar, not on your read of the market.
  • Several LifePath siblings, including the 2035 (ITDC) and 2045 (ITDE) vintages, stand ahead of it in our target-date cohort.

Full ITDB profile⁠

Full ITDF profile⁠

ITDB vs ITDF Holdings

How ITDB and ITDF differ

Overlap by weight is not available for these funds.

Level by level

  • Countryby domicile86.3%
  • Sector11 Sectors97.0%

Sector

Sector weights in ITDB and ITDF, widest gap first
SectorMore in ITDBMore in ITDF
TechnologyITDF +1.4 points
UtilitiesITDB +1.4 points
EnergyITDB +0.9 points
FinancialsITDF +0.6 points
CommunicationITDF +0.6 points
IndustrialsITDB +0.3 points
Consumer StaplesITDB +0.2 points
Consumer DiscretionaryITDF +0.2 points
MaterialsITDF +0.1 points
Real EstateITDB +0.1 points
Health CareSame weight

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in ITDB and ITDF, widest gap first
CountryMore in ITDBMore in ITDF
United StatesITDB +13.7 points
JapanITDF +2.6 points
TaiwanITDF +1.7 points
IndiaITDF +1.4 points
NetherlandsITDF +1.3 points
South KoreaITDF +1.1 points
United KingdomITDF +1.1 points
CanadaITDF +1.1 points
Other countries (5)ITDF +3.5 points

Outside the US: ITDF 69% developed, 31% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • ITDB11.4%
  • ITDF19.1%

Asset class

ITDB
Multi-Asset
ITDF
Multi-Asset

Holdings

Top 10 Holdings

Top 10 holdings by combined weight
HoldingITDBITDF
AAPLApple2.23%3.84%
NVDANVIDIA2.20%3.68%
MSFTMicrosoft1.74%2.99%
AMZNAmazon.com Inc1.04%1.80%
Taiwan Semiconductor ManufacturingTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing0.76%1.42%
GOOGLAlphabet Class A0.73%1.26%
AVGOBroadcom Inc0.71%1.17%
METAMeta Platforms Class A0.61%1.04%
GOOGAlphabet Class C0.59%1.02%
TSLATesla Inc0.52%0.90%

All ITDB holdings⁠All ITDF holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ITDB vs ITDF Cost

Overpaying ITDF vs ITDB

$415

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ITDB 0.09%

    $1,898

  • ITDF 0.11%

    $2,313

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ITDB 0.09%
  • ITDF 0.11%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$500$1K$1.5K$2K$2.5K051015202530ITDF $2,313ITDB $1,898

Year by year

YearITDBITDFOverpaying
10$165$201$36
20$646$788$142
30$1,898$2,313$415

Expense ratio

  • 0.09%ITDB, cheaper
  • 0.11%ITDF
  • Middle half of Target Date funds
  • Median 0.11%

ITDB cheapest of 9 funds

ITDF 3rd cheapest of 9 funds

ITDB vs ITDF Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
ITDB 1.94%, better
ITDF 1.49%
Payout (12M)
ITDB $0.67
ITDF $0.61
Last payment
ITDB $0.67
ITDF $0.61
Ex-dividend
ITDB Dec 23, 2025
ITDF Dec 23, 2025
Paid on
ITDB Dec 29, 2025
ITDF Dec 29, 2025
Frequency
ITDB Annual
ITDF Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

ITDBAnnual · 3 paymentsAll ITDB payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 22, 2023 $0.17; Dec 20, 2024 $0.58; Dec 23, 2025 $0.67. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD
ITDFAnnual · 3 paymentsAll ITDF payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 22, 2023 $0.23; Dec 20, 2024 $0.49; Dec 23, 2025 $0.61. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD

ITDB vs ITDF Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ITDB 7.9%, betterITDF 11.2%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ITDB 1.18ITDF 1.39, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ITDB −8.4%since Oct 2023ITDF −15.7%since Oct 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ITDB 0.59ITDF 0.88

Popular comparisons

  • ITDBAvsITDCA

    iShares LifePath Target Date 2030 ETF · iShares LifePath Target Date 2035 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.09% · 0.10%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ITDFBvsITDCA

    iShares LifePath Target Date 2050 ETF · iShares LifePath Target Date 2035 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.11% · 0.10%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ITDBAvsITDDB

    iShares LifePath Target Date 2030 ETF · iShares LifePath Target Date 2040 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.09% · 0.11%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ITDFBvsITDDB

    iShares LifePath Target Date 2050 ETF · iShares LifePath Target Date 2040 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.11% · 0.11%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ITDBAvsITDEB

    iShares LifePath Target Date 2030 ETF · iShares LifePath Target Date 2045 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.09% · 0.11%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ITDFBvsITDEB

    iShares LifePath Target Date 2050 ETF · iShares LifePath Target Date 2045 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.11% · 0.11%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.