IWMW ranks 2nd and IWMY 8th of 9 funds in the Russell 2000 Option Income Category.
IWMW vs IWMY
IWMW −0.66pt a year
0.39%1.05%
IWMY 3.5×the volume
14.8K52.3K
IWMW vs IWMY Performance
+9.7%+4.6%
- IWMW 0.39%, better
- IWMY 1.05%
- IWMW $55M
- IWMY $79M
- IWMW +9.7%, better
- IWMY +4.6%
- IWMW 20.14%
- IWMY 36.95%, better
- IWMW 1970
- IWMY 3
- IWMW 14.8K sh
- IWMY 52.3K sh, better
- IWMW $37.45
- IWMY $16.58
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IWMW | IWMY |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A83Higher | F18 |
| Mission | A86Higher | C44 |
| Risk | D39Higher | D35 |
| Tradability | C51 | C53Higher |
| Holdings | A86 | |
| Durability | B64 | B64 |
Rank among Russell 2000 Option Income funds
Same Category. IWMW and IWMY are both graded against the same 9 Russell 2000 Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IWMWA
IWMYD
In short
IWMW Small-cap income, stripped down: IWMW owns a Russell 2000 index fund and writes monthly covered calls against it, at 0.39% a year when most Russell 2000 call-writers charge more.
IWMY Most Russell 2000 income funds pay monthly. IWMY pays weekly, funding it by selling daily credit call spreads on the index while holding long exposure, with a stated policy target of 30% of NAV a year in cash.
Stated mandate
IWMW The fund seeks to track an index holding the iShares Russell 2000 ETF and writes monthly covered calls to generate income.
IWMY The Fund seeks current income as its primary objective and secondary exposure to the performance of the Russell 2000 Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IWMW vs IWMY Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IWMW vs IWMY Cost
Overpaying IWMY vs IWMW
$11,597
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IWMW 0.39%
$7,898
IWMY 1.05%
$19,495
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IWMW | IWMY | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $1,847 | $1,142 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $6,927 | $4,202 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $19,495 | $11,597 |
- 0.39%IWMW, cheaper
- 1.05%IWMY
- Middle half of Russell 2000 Option Income funds
- Median 0.69%
IWMW 2nd cheapest of 9 funds
IWMY 8th cheapest of 9 funds
IWMW vs IWMY Dividends
- IWMW 20.14%
- IWMY 36.95%, better
- IWMW $7.52
- IWMY $6.13
- IWMW $0.59
- IWMY $0.10
- IWMW Oct 2, 2026
- IWMY Oct 29, 2026
- IWMW Oct 7, 2026
- IWMY Oct 30, 2026
- IWMW Monthly
- IWMY Weekly
Distribution history
IWMW vs IWMY Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IWMW 12.4%IWMY 13.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- IWMW 0.37IWMY 0.48
- Worst fall
- IWMW −21.9%IWMY −18.6%
- Market sensitivity
- IWMW 0.75IWMY 0.85
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.05% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.05% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.86%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.05% · 0.86%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.