RYLG ranks 2nd and IWMY 8th of 9 funds in the Russell 2000 Option Income Category.
IWMY vs RYLG
RYLG −0.70pt a year
1.05%0.35%
IWMY 28.7×the volume
52.3K1.82K
IWMY vs RYLG Performance
+4.6%+12.7%
- IWMY 1.05%
- RYLG 0.35%, better
- IWMY $79M
- RYLG $7M
- IWMY +4.6%
- RYLG +12.7%, better
- IWMY 36.95%, better
- RYLG 10.40%
- IWMY 3
- RYLG 2
- IWMY 52.3K sh, better
- RYLG 1.82K sh
- IWMY $16.58
- RYLG $23.34
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IWMY | RYLG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F18 | A93Higher |
| Mission | C44 | A99Higher |
| Risk | D35 | C46Higher |
| Tradability | C53Higher | D35 |
| Holdings | C45 | |
| Durability | B64Higher | C45 |
Rank among Russell 2000 Option Income funds
Same Category. IWMY and RYLG are both graded against the same 9 Russell 2000 Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IWMYD
RYLGA
In short
IWMY Most Russell 2000 income funds pay monthly. IWMY pays weekly, funding it by selling daily credit call spreads on the index while holding long exposure, with a stated policy target of 30% of NAV a year in cash.
RYLG Most small-cap income funds sell calls on the whole book. RYLG writes one-month at-the-money calls on about half of it, leaving the rest uncapped, and it charges the lowest fee in its Russell 2000 options-income group.
Stated mandate
IWMY The Fund seeks current income as its primary objective and secondary exposure to the performance of the Russell 2000 Index.
RYLG The Fund seeks results generally corresponding to the Cboe Russell 2000 Half BuyWrite Index. It obtains Russell 2000 equity exposure and sells one-month at-the-money calls covering approximately half of the portfolio value.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IWMY vs RYLG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IWMY vs RYLG Cost
Overpaying IWMY vs RYLG
$12,369
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IWMY 1.05%
$19,495
RYLG 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IWMY | RYLG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,847 | $634 | $1,213 |
| 20 | $6,927 | $2,454 | $4,473 |
| 30 | $19,495 | $7,126 | $12,369 |
- 1.05%IWMY
- 0.35%RYLG, cheaper
- Middle half of Russell 2000 Option Income funds
- Median 0.69%
RYLG cheapest of 9 funds
IWMY 8th cheapest of 9 funds
IWMY vs RYLG Dividends
- IWMY 36.95%, better
- RYLG 10.40%
- IWMY $6.13
- RYLG $2.42
- IWMY $0.10
- RYLG $0.11
- IWMY Oct 29, 2026
- RYLG Oct 19, 2026
- IWMY Oct 30, 2026
- RYLG Oct 22, 2026
- IWMY Weekly
- RYLG Monthly
Distribution history
IWMY vs RYLG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IWMY 13.0%RYLG 13.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- IWMY 0.48RYLG 0.83
- Worst fall
- IWMY −18.6%RYLG −22.4%
- Market sensitivity
- IWMY 0.85RYLG 0.96
Popular comparisons
- 1.05% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.05% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.05% · 0.86%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.86%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.