Skip to content

IYC vs XLY

iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF

IYCCNYSE Arca

State Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR ETF

XLYANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

XLY −0.29pt a year

IYC0.37%XLY0.08%

Avg volume · 30D

XLY 50.8×the volume

IYC145KXLY7.35M

10Y return · a year

XLY +0.9pt

IYC+12.1%XLY+13.0%

IYC vs XLY Performance

Nov 9, 2021 – Nov 9, 2026

+26.9%IYC+23.4%XLY

Nov 9, 2021 to Nov 9, 2026. IYC +26.9%. XLY +23.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−30%−20%−10%0%10%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026
Expense ratio
IYC 0.37%
XLY 0.08%, better
Fund size
IYC $1.61B
XLY $22.7B
1Y total return
IYC +4.3%, better
XLY +3.4%
Yield (12M)
IYC 0.50%
XLY 0.77%, better
Holdings
IYC 158
XLY 50
Avg volume (30D)
IYC 145K sh
XLY 7.35M sh, better
NAV per share
IYC $103.31
XLY $117.59
52W range

ETF.net Grade

IYC: Cost 29, Risk 72, Mission not scored, Tradability 60, Holdings 58, Durability 71. XLY: Cost 96, Risk 55, Mission 81, Tradability 100, Holdings 40, Durability 79.
Pillar letters and Scores for IYC, XLY, with each pillar’s weight
PillarIYCXLY
Cost30% weightD29A96Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA81
Risk15% weightA72HigherB55
Tradability15% weightB60A100Higher
Holdings10% weightB58HigherC40
Durability5% weightA71A79Higher

Rank among Consumer Discretionary (Broad) funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. IYC and XLY are both graded against the same 14 Consumer Discretionary (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

See all 14 ›

XLY ranks 1st and IYC 8th of 14 funds in the Consumer Discretionary (Broad) Category.

  1. Rank 1AXLYState Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR ETFScore 80
  2. Rank 2BFDISFidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETFScore 70
  3. Rank 7CPSCDInvesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Discretionary ETFScore 51
  4. Rank 8CIYCiShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETFScore 50
  5. Rank 9CTRUDVanEck Consumer Discretionary TruSector ETFScore 49

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

IYCCiShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF

XLYAState Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR ETF

In short

IYC Consumer discretionary with the tent pitched wide: about 160 Russell 1000 names spanning retail, media and consumer services, with index caps that trim the giants daily. On the tape since June 2000, at 0.37%.

XLY Live since 1998 as one of the original Select Sector SPDRs, XLY bundles the S&P 500's spending-money stocks (cars, couches, burgers, online carts) into one heavily traded ticker at eight basis points.

Stated mandate

IYC The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. equities in the consumer discretionary sector, providing diversified exposure to retail, media, and consumer services companies in the United States.

XLY The fund seeks to track the performance of the Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index, providing targeted exposure to companies in the consumer discretionary sector.

Why people hold it

  • IYC Breadth over a short list: about 160 stocks drawn from the Russell 1000, so mid-cap retailers and services names ride along with the mega-caps.ishares.com
  • The benchmark is a 40 Act capped build, trimming the heaviest weights on a daily basis so one runaway giant cannot quietly become the whole fund.lseg.com
  • The media aisle comes attached: retail, consumer services and media companies all sit under one ticker here.ishares.com
  • Listed in June 2000, so it has traded through the dot-com bust, 2008 and 2020, and it pays quarterly.
  • XLY Charges 0.08% a year, a fraction of the roughly 0.35% typical for consumer discretionary funds, and tied for the cheapest in its peer group.
  • A multi-billion-dollar fund and one of the most actively traded in the category, which generally shows up as tight bid-ask spreads for buyers and sellers.
  • Plain mandate: S&P 500 consumer discretionary members, with capping rules that stop any single company from swallowing the index. Pays quarterly.spglobal.com
  • Trading since December 1998 as one of the first US sector funds, and it still stands among the strongest implementations in its peer group.

Worth knowing

  • IYC At 0.37% the fee sits near the category median, but the cheapest cap-weighted rivals undercut it hard: XLY at 0.08%, FDIS at 0.084%, VCR at 0.09%.
  • Caps trim the top names, they do not flatten them: a few giants still steer this sector, and the whole thing rides on consumer spending.
  • Moderately traded rather than a volume monster, so spreads can run wider than at the category's busiest tickers.
  • XLY About 50 stocks. Even with the index caps, a small handful of megacaps drives most of the movement.spglobal.com
  • S&P 500 members only, so smaller retailers and restaurant chains sit outside the index entirely.spglobal.com
  • One sector, and a cyclical one: discretionary spending rises and falls with the economy, and the fund is classified as non-diversified.sec.govbritannica.com

Full IYC profile⁠

Full XLY profile⁠

IYC vs XLY Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

IYC vs XLY Cost

Overpaying IYC vs XLY

$5,824

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • IYC 0.37%

    $7,513

  • XLY 0.08%

    $1,689

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • IYC 0.37%
  • XLY 0.08%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K051015202530IYC $7,513XLY $1,689

Year by year

YearIYCXLYOverpaying
10$670$147$523
20$2,590$575$2,015
30$7,513$1,689$5,824

Expense ratio

  • 0.37%IYC
  • 0.08%XLY, cheaper
  • Middle half of Consumer Discretionary (Broad) funds
  • Median 0.35%

XLY cheapest of 14 funds

IYC 9th cheapest of 14 funds

IYC vs XLY Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Yield (12M)
IYC 0.50%
XLY 0.77%, better
Payout (12M)
IYC $0.53
XLY $0.93
Last payment
IYC $0.15
XLY $0.24
Ex-dividend
IYC Sep 15, 2026
XLY Sep 21, 2026
Paid on
IYC Sep 18, 2026
XLY Sep 23, 2026
Frequency
IYC Quarterly
XLY Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

IYCQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll IYC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 24, 2017 $0.08; Jun 27, 2017 $0.12; Sep 26, 2017 $0.12; Dec 19, 2017 $0.09; Mar 22, 2018 $0.10; Jun 26, 2018 $0.10; Sep 26, 2018 $0.11; Dec 17, 2018 $0.10; Mar 20, 2019 $0.09; Jun 17, 2019 $0.11; Sep 24, 2019 $0.16; Dec 16, 2019 $0.15; Mar 25, 2020 $0.12; Jun 15, 2020 $0.08; Sep 23, 2020 $0.11; Dec 14, 2020 $0.14; Mar 25, 2021 $0.09; Jun 10, 2021 $0.08; Sep 24, 2021 $0.11; Dec 13, 2021 $0.04; Mar 24, 2022 $0.09; Jun 9, 2022 $0.09; Sep 26, 2022 $0.11; Dec 13, 2022 $0.10; Mar 23, 2023 $0.14; Jun 7, 2023 $0.09; Sep 26, 2023 $0.13; Dec 20, 2023 $0.16; Mar 21, 2024 $0.12; Jun 11, 2024 $0.11; Sep 25, 2024 $0.13; Dec 17, 2024 $0.10; Mar 18, 2025 $0.14; Jun 16, 2025 $0.14; Sep 16, 2025 $0.14; Dec 16, 2025 $0.11; Mar 17, 2026 $0.13; Jun 15, 2026 $0.14; Sep 15, 2026 $0.15. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252017202020232026YTD
XLYQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll XLY payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 17, 2017 $0.13; Jun 16, 2017 $0.14; Sep 15, 2017 $0.16; Dec 15, 2017 $0.17; Mar 16, 2018 $0.16; Jun 15, 2018 $0.15; Sep 21, 2018 $0.18; Dec 21, 2018 $0.19; Mar 15, 2019 $0.19; Jun 21, 2019 $0.21; Sep 20, 2019 $0.20; Dec 20, 2019 $0.20; Mar 23, 2020 $0.21; Jun 22, 2020 $0.15; Sep 21, 2020 $0.15; Dec 21, 2020 $0.15; Mar 22, 2021 $0.13; Jun 21, 2021 $0.13; Sep 20, 2021 $0.14; Dec 20, 2021 $0.15; Mar 21, 2022 $0.14; Jun 21, 2022 $0.16; Sep 19, 2022 $0.17; Dec 19, 2022 $0.18; Mar 20, 2023 $0.22; Jun 20, 2023 $0.17; Sep 18, 2023 $0.15; Dec 18, 2023 $0.16; Mar 18, 2024 $0.19; Jun 24, 2024 $0.20; Sep 23, 2024 $0.20; Dec 23, 2024 $0.22; Mar 24, 2025 $0.27; Jun 23, 2025 $0.22; Sep 22, 2025 $0.21; Dec 22, 2025 $0.24; Mar 23, 2026 $0.22; Jun 22, 2026 $0.23; Sep 21, 2026 $0.24. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252017202020232026YTD

IYC vs XLY Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • IYC
  • XLY
Nov 9, 2021 to Nov 9, 2026. Worst fall: XLY −39.7% · Dec 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−40%−30%−20%−10%0%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
IYC 15.6%, betterXLY 17.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
IYC 0.77, betterXLY 0.67
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
IYC −35.5%, betterXLY −39.7%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
IYC 1.03XLY 1.21

IYC and XLY in the news

Popular comparisons

  • IYCCvsFDISB

    iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF · Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.37% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XLYAvsVCRB

    State Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR ETF · Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IYCCvsXRTB

    iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Retail ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.37% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XLYAvsFDISB

    State Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR ETF · Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IYCCvsVCRB

    iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF · Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.37% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XLYAvsXRTB

    State Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Retail ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.