JUSA ranks 1st and JGRO 13th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
JGRO vs JUSA
JUSA −0.26pt a year
0.44%0.18%
JGRO 5.4×the volume
536K98.8K
JGRO vs JUSA Performance
−5.4%+10.8%
- JGRO 0.44%
- JUSA 0.18%, better
- JGRO $9.48B
- JUSA $745M
- JGRO −5.4%
- JUSA +10.8%, better
- JGRO 0.16%
- JUSA 0.72%, better
- JGRO 140
- JUSA 263
- JGRO 536K sh, better
- JUSA 98.8K sh
- JGRO $91.05
- JUSA $67.75
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | JGRO | JUSA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A74 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A84 | |
| Risk | C46 | A92Higher |
| Tradability | B63Higher | B58 |
| Holdings | B68 | A84Higher |
| Durability | A87Higher | A76 |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. JGRO and JUSA are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
JGROB
JUSAA
In short
JGRO J.P. Morgan's stock pickers run a concentrated US growth book in ETF form: roughly 130 large- and mid-cap names chosen bottom-up, at a fee below the typical active growth fund.
JUSA Active stock picking in index clothing: J.P. Morgan analysts tilt roughly 300 large caps while sector weights and risk stay close to the S&P 500, for 0.18% a year with no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
JGRO JGRO seeks long-term capital appreciation through an actively managed, fundamental, bottom-up portfolio focused primarily on U.S. large- and mid-capitalization companies with underappreciated growth potential.
JUSA The fund seeks capital appreciation through active, fundamental, bottom-up selection of large-cap U.S. equities. It targets companies with strong long-term earnings potential and attractive valuations relative to peers.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
JGRO vs JUSA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
JGRO vs JUSA Cost
Overpaying JGRO vs JUSA
$5,103
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
JGRO 0.44%
$8,852
JUSA 0.18%
$3,749
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | JGRO | JUSA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $794 | $328 | $466 |
| 20 | $3,061 | $1,281 | $1,780 |
| 30 | $8,852 | $3,749 | $5,103 |
- 0.44%JGRO
- 0.18%JUSA, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
JUSA cheapest of 90 funds
JGRO 24th cheapest of 90 funds
JGRO vs JUSA Dividends
- JGRO 0.16%
- JUSA 0.72%, better
- JGRO $0.15
- JUSA $0.49
- JGRO $0.15
- JUSA $0.13
- JGRO Dec 16, 2025
- JUSA Sep 22, 2026
- JGRO Dec 18, 2025
- JUSA Sep 24, 2026
- JGRO Annual
- JUSA Quarterly
Distribution history
JGRO vs JUSA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- JGRO 16.8%JUSA 11.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- JGRO 0.92JUSA 1.41
- Worst fall
- JGRO −22.7%JUSA −14.0%
- Market sensitivity
- JGRO 1.10JUSA 0.98
JGRO and JUSA in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.44% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.44% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.44% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


