SCMB ranks 4th and JHMU 30th of 63 funds in the Other Municipal Bond Category.
JHMU vs SCMB
SCMB −0.36pt a year
0.39%0.03%
SCMB 87.1×the volume
37.6K3.28M
JHMU +2.0pt
+5.7%+3.7%
JHMU vs SCMB Performance
+1.4%−0.5%
- JHMU 0.39%
- SCMB 0.03%, better
- JHMU $104M
- SCMB $4.07B
- JHMU +1.4%, better
- SCMB −0.5%
- JHMU 3.72%
- SCMB 3.97%, better
- JHMU 337
- SCMB 8205
- JHMU 37.6K sh
- SCMB 3.28M sh, better
- JHMU $25.58
- SCMB $24.87
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | JHMU | SCMB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F23 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A93 | A96Higher |
| Risk | A74Higher | C46 |
| Tradability | B57 | A81Higher |
| Holdings | B66 | A81Higher |
| Durability | C44 | A72Higher |
Rank among Other Municipal Bond funds
Same Category. JHMU and SCMB are both graded against the same 63 Other Municipal Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
JHMUB
SCMBA
In short
JHMU John Hancock's first muni ETF skips the index and hunts pricing imbalances bond by bond, favoring revenue bonds with call protection. That active work runs 0.39% net of a waiver through July 31, 2027.
SCMB Schwab's take on the core muni sleeve: three basis points, thousands of AMT-free bonds from across the country, and a monthly distribution. Bottom-of-the-table pricing, no frills attached.
Stated mandate
JHMU The fund seeks a high level of interest income that is exempt from federal income tax. Its strategy uses pricing imbalances within the municipal bond market.
SCMB The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of an index representing the U.S. AMT-free municipal bond market.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
JHMU vs SCMB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
JHMU vs SCMB Cost
Overpaying JHMU vs SCMB
$7,260
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
JHMU 0.39%
$7,898
SCMB 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | JHMU | SCMB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $55 | $650 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $216 | $2,509 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $638 | $7,260 |
- 0.39%JHMU
- 0.03%SCMB, cheaper
- Middle half of Other Municipal Bond funds
- Median 0.30%
SCMB cheapest of 63 funds
JHMU 47th cheapest of 63 funds
JHMU vs SCMB Dividends
- JHMU 3.72%
- SCMB 3.97%, better
- JHMU $0.95
- SCMB $0.98
- JHMU $0.04
- SCMB $0.07
- JHMU Oct 28, 2026
- SCMB Nov 2, 2026
- JHMU Oct 30, 2026
- SCMB Pays Nov 6, 2026
- JHMU Monthly
- SCMB Monthly
Distribution history
JHMU vs SCMB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- JHMU 4.9%SCMB 5.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- JHMU −0.03SCMB −0.04
- Worst fall
- JHMU −6.2%SCMB −6.7%
- Market sensitivity
- JHMU 0.19SCMB 0.96
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.