Skip to content

JUNT vs SIXJ

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Jun ETF

JUNTBCboe

AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

SIXJBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

JUNT0.74%SIXJ0.74%

Avg volume · 30D

SIXJ 1.5×the volume

JUNT9.86KSIXJ15.1K

3Y return · a year

SIXJ +0.8pt

JUNT+13.7%SIXJ+14.5%

JUNT vs SIXJ Performance

Nov 7, 2025 – Nov 9, 2026

+7.2%JUNT+10.7%SIXJ

Nov 7, 2025 to Nov 9, 2026. JUNT +7.2%. SIXJ +10.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%2.5%5%12.5%Nov 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
JUNT 0.74%
SIXJ 0.74%
Fund size
JUNT $111M
SIXJ $146M
1Y total return
JUNT +7.2%
SIXJ +10.7%, better
Holdings
JUNT 3
SIXJ 3
Avg volume (30D)
JUNT 9.86K sh
SIXJ 15.1K sh, better
NAV per share
JUNT $37.54
SIXJ $36.56
52W range

ETF.net Grade

JUNT: Cost 68, Risk 53, Mission not scored, Tradability 41, Holdings 59, Durability 43. SIXJ: Cost 68, Risk 72, Mission not scored, Tradability 72, Holdings 53, Durability 57.
Pillar letters and Scores for JUNT, SIXJ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarJUNTSIXJ
Cost30% weightB68B68
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC53A72Higher
Tradability15% weightC41A72Higher
Holdings10% weightB59HigherC53
Durability5% weightC43B57Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. JUNT and SIXJ are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

SIXJ ranks 2nd and JUNT 24th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1AZALTInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - QuarterlyScore 76
  2. Rank 2BAUGPPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - AugustScore 66
  3. Rank 2BSIXJAllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETFScore 66
  4. Rank 4BJANPPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - JanuaryScore 65
  5. Rank 22BSIXZAllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 May/Nov ETFScore 57
  6. Rank 24BJUNTAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Jun ETFScore 56
  7. Rank 24BSIXFAllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Feb/Aug ETFScore 56

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

JUNTBAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Jun ETF

SIXJBAllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

In short

JUNT A one-year seatbelt bolted to the largest S&P 500 ETF: JUNT absorbs the first 10% of that fund's price decline between June 1 and May 31, and in exchange your upside stops at a cap that resets each June.

SIXJ Most buffer ETFs lock you into a 12-month cycle. SIXJ runs a six-month one, resetting each January and July: it tracks SPY's share-price move, absorbs the first 10% of losses, and takes a fresh upside cap twice a year.

Stated mandate

JUNT The Fund seeks to match the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust's share-price return over the June 1–May 31 outcome period, subject to an upside cap, while buffering the first 10% of losses.

SIXJ The Fund seeks to match the share-price return of SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust over a six-month outcome period, subject to an upside cap and protection against the first 10% of losses.

Why people hold it

  • JUNT The first 10% of the reference ETF's price decline over each June 1 to May 31 stretch is absorbed before your losses start. That is written into the fund's own filings, not implied.
  • Costs 0.74% a year, below the median fee in its shallow-buffer cohort of 50-plus funds, and the same rate AllianzIM charges on six-month siblings SIXD and SIXJ.
  • It reloads on its own: a fresh outcome period, buffer and new cap begin every June 1, so there is no roll trade to diary.
  • Sits among the stronger builds in a crowded shallow-buffer field of more than fifty competing funds.
  • SIXJ The 10% buffer and the cap reset every January 1 and July 1, so terms refresh twice a year instead of on the usual annual clock.
  • 0.74% expense ratio, on the lean side for a defined-outcome fund and below the typical fee among its shallow-buffer peers.
  • The reference asset is SPY itself, the original S&P 500 ETF, so the payoff is keyed to a plain vanilla benchmark rather than a bespoke index.
  • Rates among the stronger implementations in a crowded shallow-buffer field, alongside AllianzIM's other six-month siblings like SIXZ and SIXD.

Worth knowing

  • JUNT Upside stops at a cap struck each June 1 off option prices, so in a powerful rally you keep less than the reference ETF does.
  • Buy mid-period and you inherit whatever buffer and cap are left at that price. The stated terms describe a full June-to-May hold, not a partial one.
  • No distribution stream here; the outcome shows up in share price. The fund also launched in 2023, so its history is short.
  • SIXJ Buffer and cap are designed to work over the full six-month period. Buy mid-period and you get whatever cushion and upside room remain at that moment.
  • It tracks SPY's share-price return, so dividends aren't passed through and the fund isn't structured to pay income.
  • Volume is light next to the largest buffer funds, so bid-ask spreads can run wider, especially in fast-moving markets.

Full JUNT profile⁠

Full SIXJ profile⁠

JUNT vs SIXJ Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

JUNT vs SIXJ Cost

Same expense ratio

$14,307

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • JUNT 0.74%

    $14,307

  • SIXJ 0.74%

    $14,307

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • JUNT 0.74%
  • SIXJ 0.74%
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530JUNT $14,307SIXJ $14,307

Year by year

YearJUNTSIXJ
10$1,319$1,319
20$5,015$5,015
30$14,307$14,307

Expense ratio

  • 0.74%JUNT
  • 0.74%SIXJ
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

JUNT 17th cheapest of 77 funds

SIXJ 17th cheapest of 77 funds

JUNT vs SIXJ Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Payout (12M)
JUNT None
SIXJ None

Distribution history

JUNTAll JUNT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

SIXJAll SIXJ payments⁠

No distribution history available.

JUNT vs SIXJ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
JUNT 6.9%SIXJ 5.9%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
JUNT 1.42SIXJ 1.67, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
JUNT −12.8%since Jun 2023SIXJ −14.1%since Jan 2022
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
JUNT 0.53SIXJ 0.46

Popular comparisons

  • JUNTBvsZALTA

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Jun ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SIXJBvsZALTA

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JUNTBvsAUGPB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Jun ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SIXJBvsAUGPB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JUNTBvsJANPB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Jun ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - January

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SIXJBvsJANPB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - January

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.