JUSA ranks 1st and TMFM 83rd of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
JUSA vs TMFM
JUSA −0.67pt a year
0.18%0.85%
JUSA 16.2×the volume
112K6.9K
JUSA vs TMFM Performance
+12.2%−3.2%
- JUSA 0.18%, better
- TMFM 0.85%
- JUSA $871M
- TMFM $109M
- JUSA +12.2%, better
- TMFM −3.2%
- JUSA 0.72%, better
- TMFM 0.06%
- JUSA 264
- TMFM 35
- JUSA 112K sh, better
- TMFM 6.9K sh
- JUSA $65.95
- TMFM $22.23
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | JUSA | TMFM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A99Higher | F7 |
| Mission | A84 | |
| Risk | A92Higher | D30 |
| Tradability | B60Higher | D26 |
| Holdings | A83Higher | B57 |
| Durability | A77Higher | B66 |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. JUSA and TMFM are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
JUSAA
TMFMD
In short
JUSA Active stock picking in index clothing: J.P. Morgan analysts tilt roughly 300 large caps while sector weights and risk stay close to the S&P 500, for 0.18% a year with no waiver attached.
TMFM The Motley Fool's own fund shop, stock-picking US mid caps for quality and growth. It ran as a mutual fund from 2014 and converted into an ETF in 2021, so the strategy is older than the ticker.
Stated mandate
JUSA The fund seeks capital appreciation through active, fundamental, bottom-up selection of large-cap U.S. equities. It targets companies with strong long-term earnings potential and attractive valuations relative to peers.
TMFM The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through an actively managed portfolio of U.S. mid-cap companies, using a quality-growth approach.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
JUSA vs TMFM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
JUSA vs TMFM Cost
Overpaying TMFM vs JUSA
$12,450
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
JUSA 0.18%
$3,749
TMFM 0.85%
$16,199
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | JUSA | TMFM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $1,508 | $1,180 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $5,706 | $4,425 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $16,199 | $12,450 |
- 0.18%JUSA, cheaper
- 0.85%TMFM
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
JUSA cheapest of 90 funds
TMFM 82nd cheapest of 90 funds
JUSA vs TMFM Dividends
- JUSA 0.72%, better
- TMFM 0.06%
- JUSA $0.49
- TMFM $0.01
- JUSA $0.13
- TMFM $0.01
- JUSA Sep 22, 2026
- TMFM Dec 18, 2025
- JUSA Sep 24, 2026
- TMFM Dec 19, 2025
- JUSA Quarterly
- TMFM Annual
Distribution history
JUSA vs TMFM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- JUSA 11.6%TMFM 17.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- JUSA 1.41TMFM 0.11
- Worst fall
- JUSA −14.0%TMFM −31.7%
- Market sensitivity
- JUSA 0.98TMFM 0.94
JUSA and TMFM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

