Skip to content

KNGZ vs NOBL

First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Dividend Aristocrats ETF

KNGZCNasdaq

ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF

NOBLACboe

Overlap

20.1%by weight

Expense ratio

NOBL −0.15pt a year

KNGZ0.50%NOBL0.35%

Avg volume · 30D

NOBL 187.7×the volume

KNGZ5.75KNOBL1.08M

5Y return · a year

KNGZ +4.0pt

KNGZ+11.0%NOBL+7.0%

KNGZ vs NOBL Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+68.4%KNGZ+40.1%NOBL

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. KNGZ +68.4%. NOBL +40.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%20%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
KNGZ 0.50%
NOBL 0.35%, better
Fund size
KNGZ $69M
NOBL $11.9B
1Y total return
KNGZ +25.9%, better
NOBL +19.0%
Yield (12M)
KNGZ 2.45%, better
NOBL 1.98%
Holdings
KNGZ 99
NOBL 69
Avg volume (30D)
KNGZ 5.75K sh
NOBL 1.08M sh, better
NAV per share
KNGZ $43.39
NOBL $59.15
52W range

ETF.net Grade

KNGZ: Cost 23, Risk 44, Mission 73, Tradability 30, Holdings 28, Durability 44. NOBL: Cost 65, Risk 41, Mission 88, Tradability 87, Holdings 67, Durability 69.
Pillar letters and Scores for KNGZ, NOBL, with each pillar’s weight
PillarKNGZNOBL
Cost30% weightF23B65Higher
Mission25% weightA73A88Higher
Risk15% weightC44HigherC41
Tradability15% weightD30A87Higher
Holdings10% weightD28B67Higher
Durability5% weightC44B69Higher

Rank among Dividend Aristocrats funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. KNGZ and NOBL are both graded against the same 7 Dividend Aristocrats funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Dividend Aristocrats⁠

Category · 7 funds
See all 7 ›

NOBL ranks 2nd and KNGZ 5th of 7 funds in the Dividend Aristocrats Category.

  1. Rank 1ASDYState Street SPDR S&P Dividend ETFScore 75
  2. Rank 2ANOBLProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETFScore 70
  3. Rank 3BREGLProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETFScore 57
  4. Rank 3BWDIVState Street SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETFScore 57
  5. Rank 5CKNGZFirst Trust S&P 500 Diversified Dividend Aristocrats ETFScore 41
  6. Rank 6CSNPDXtrackers S&P Dividend Aristocrats Screened ETFScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

KNGZCFirst Trust S&P 500 Diversified Dividend Aristocrats ETF

NOBLAProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF

In short

KNGZ Dividend Aristocrats with a diversification rule bolted on: KNGZ tracks a sector-neutral S&P 500 dividend-grower index, so sector weights are set by design instead of drifting toward wherever the dividend growers happen to cluster.

NOBL Dividend investing without the yield chase. NOBL holds roughly 70 S&P 500 companies picked for their records as dividend growers, not for the fattest payout on the screen. A purist's take on the theme, running since 2013.

Stated mandate

KNGZ The Fund seeks to track the price and yield of the S&P 500 Sector-Neutral Dividend Aristocrats Index. It normally invests at least 90% of assets in index securities and uses an indexing approach.

NOBL The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index.

Why people hold it

  • KNGZ The "diversified" in the name is structural: a sector-neutral index of roughly 100 dividend payers, so no single sector quietly becomes the whole portfolio.ftportfolios.com
  • Plain index plumbing: normally at least 90% of assets in index securities, no manager discretion, and it has stayed close to the benchmark it names.ftportfolios.com
  • Live since 2017 as a First Trust index tracker, with distributions on a quarterly schedule.
  • NOBL The screen is the product: a slice of about 70 names pulled from the S&P 500 on dividend-growth credentials, not headline yield.
  • At 0.35% a year, it sits below the typical fee in its dividend-growth peer group and matches SDY, the other big S&P dividend index fund.
  • A multi-billion-dollar fund that trades actively, and it has tracked its index tightly. One of the stronger builds in its niche.

Worth knowing

  • KNGZ Cost is the trade-off: 0.50% a year against a 0.40% peer median, and SPDG runs sector-neutral S&P dividend exposure for 0.05%.
  • Thinly traded with a modest asset base, so spreads and order type matter more here than in the category's household names.
  • It sits in the lower half of its dividend-aristocrat peer group overall, with fee and trading costs, not index tracking, driving that.
  • NOBL Mid-priced, not cheap. Broad sector-neutral dividend index funds such as SPDG charge a fraction of NOBL's 0.35%.
  • Roughly 70 stocks means real single-name and sector concentration next to the full S&P 500, and it is all-equity, so market drawdowns come through.
  • Cash lands quarterly, not monthly, and the mandate rewards payout consistency rather than the biggest current yield.

Full KNGZ profile⁠

Full NOBL profile⁠

KNGZ vs NOBL Holdings

How KNGZ and NOBL differ

Overlap by weight

20.1%

Shared holdings make up 43.7% of NOBL and 23.3% of KNGZ.

Level by level

  • Holdings29 in both20.1%
  • Sector11 Sectors48.1%
  • Countryby domicile97.1%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in KNGZ and NOBL, widest gap first
SectorMore in KNGZMore in NOBL
TechnologyKNGZ +38.4 points
Consumer StaplesNOBL +18.7 points
IndustrialsNOBL +13.5 points
CommunicationKNGZ +9.4 points
MaterialsNOBL +9.2 points
Consumer DiscretionaryKNGZ +4.1 points
UtilitiesNOBL +3.6 points
FinancialsNOBL +2.5 points
Real EstateNOBL +2.2 points
Health CareNOBL +1.8 points
EnergyNOBL +0.4 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in KNGZ and NOBL, widest gap first
CountryMore in KNGZMore in NOBL
ChinaKNGZ +2.9 points
SwitzerlandNOBL +1.5 points
United KingdomNOBL +0.8 points
United StatesNOBL +0.6 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • KNGZ36.1%
  • NOBL16.6%

Securities held

  • KNGZ98
  • NOBL68

Asset class

KNGZ
Equity
NOBL
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in KNGZ69
  • In both29
  • Only in NOBL39

Only in KNGZ

69 securities, 76.4% of KNGZ by weight

  • Accenture plc4.20%
  • Texas Instruments Incorporated4.13%
  • Microchip Technology Incorporated3.92%

Only in NOBL

39 securities, 55.8% of NOBL by weight

  • Pentair PLC1.77%
  • Erie Indemnity Company-Cl A1.51%
  • Nextera Energy Inc1.51%

Weight gaps

All 29 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in KNGZ and NOBL, widest gap first
HoldingMore in KNGZMore in NOBL
International Business Machines CorporationIBMKNGZ +2.56 points
Kimberly-Clark CorporationKMBNOBL +1.87 points
PPG Industries, Inc.PPGNOBL +1.22 points
Federal Realty Investment TrustFRTNOBL +1.22 points
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.APDNOBL +1.20 points
General Dynamics CorporationGDNOBL +1.15 points
Eversource EnergyESNOBL +1.12 points
Realty Income CorporationONOBL +1.11 points

All 98 KNGZ holdings⁠All 71 NOBL holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

KNGZ vs NOBL Cost

Overpaying KNGZ vs NOBL

$2,853

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • KNGZ 0.50%

    $9,979

  • NOBL 0.35%

    $7,126

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • KNGZ 0.50%
  • NOBL 0.35%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530KNGZ $9,979NOBL $7,126

Year by year

YearKNGZNOBLOverpaying
10$900$634$266
20$3,460$2,454$1,006
30$9,979$7,126$2,853

Expense ratio

  • 0.50%KNGZ
  • 0.35%NOBL, cheaper
  • Middle half of Dividend Aristocrats funds
  • Median 0.40%

NOBL 2nd cheapest of 7 funds

KNGZ 6th cheapest of 7 funds

KNGZ vs NOBL Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
KNGZ 2.45%, better
NOBL 1.98%
Payout (12M)
KNGZ $1.06
NOBL $1.17
Last payment
KNGZ $0.26
NOBL $0.28
Ex-dividend
KNGZ Sep 24, 2026
NOBL Sep 23, 2026
Paid on
KNGZ Sep 30, 2026
NOBL Sep 29, 2026
Frequency
KNGZ Quarterly
NOBL Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

KNGZQuarterly · 37 paymentsAll KNGZ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 37 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Sep 21, 2017 $0.08; Dec 21, 2017 $0.16; Mar 22, 2018 $0.11; Jun 21, 2018 $0.33; Sep 14, 2018 $0.13; Dec 18, 2018 $0.22; Mar 21, 2019 $0.04; Jun 14, 2019 $0.16; Sep 25, 2019 $0.20; Dec 13, 2019 $0.28; Mar 26, 2020 $0.08; Jun 25, 2020 $0.20; Sep 24, 2020 $0.15; Dec 24, 2020 $0.17; Mar 25, 2021 $0.10; Jun 24, 2021 $0.15; Sep 23, 2021 $0.11; Dec 23, 2021 $0.24; Mar 25, 2022 $0.12; Jun 24, 2022 $0.18; Sep 23, 2022 $0.19; Dec 23, 2022 $0.21; Mar 24, 2023 $0.17; Jun 27, 2023 $0.25; Sep 22, 2023 $0.18; Dec 22, 2023 $0.33; Mar 21, 2024 $0.13; Jun 27, 2024 $0.22; Sep 26, 2024 $0.20; Dec 13, 2024 $0.27; Mar 27, 2025 $0.16; Jun 26, 2025 $0.24; Sep 25, 2025 $0.23; Dec 12, 2025 $0.34; Mar 26, 2026 $0.16; Jun 25, 2026 $0.31; Sep 24, 2026 $0.26. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252017202020232026YTD
NOBLQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll NOBL payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 22, 2017 $0.10; Jun 21, 2017 $0.11; Sep 27, 2017 $0.17; Dec 26, 2017 $0.19; Mar 21, 2018 $0.12; Jun 20, 2018 $0.21; Sep 26, 2018 $0.17; Dec 26, 2018 $0.21; Mar 20, 2019 $0.12; Jun 25, 2019 $0.19; Sep 25, 2019 $0.18; Dec 24, 2019 $0.22; Mar 25, 2020 $0.17; Jun 24, 2020 $0.21; Sep 23, 2020 $0.21; Dec 23, 2020 $0.27; Mar 23, 2021 $0.19; Jun 22, 2021 $0.22; Sep 22, 2021 $0.21; Dec 23, 2021 $0.32; Mar 23, 2022 $0.18; Jun 22, 2022 $0.19; Sep 21, 2022 $0.20; Dec 22, 2022 $0.30; Mar 22, 2023 $0.18; Jun 21, 2023 $0.23; Sep 20, 2023 $0.26; Dec 20, 2023 $0.33; Mar 20, 2024 $0.19; Jun 26, 2024 $0.28; Sep 25, 2024 $0.26; Dec 23, 2024 $0.29; Mar 26, 2025 $0.23; Jun 25, 2025 $0.28; Sep 24, 2025 $0.27; Dec 24, 2025 $0.33; Mar 25, 2026 $0.26; Jun 24, 2026 $0.30; Sep 23, 2026 $0.28. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252017202020232026YTD

KNGZ vs NOBL Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • KNGZ
  • NOBL
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: KNGZ −19.7% · Sep 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
KNGZ 13.8%NOBL 13.5%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
KNGZ 1.17, betterNOBL 0.70
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
KNGZ −19.7%NOBL −17.9%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
KNGZ 0.90NOBL 0.64

KNGZ and NOBL in the news

Popular comparisons

  • KNGZCvsSDYA

    First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Dividend Aristocrats ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Dividend ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NOBLAvsSDYA

    ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Dividend ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KNGZCvsREGLB

    First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Dividend Aristocrats ETF · ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.40%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NOBLAvsREGLB

    ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF · ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.40%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KNGZCvsWDIVB

    First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Dividend Aristocrats ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.40%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NOBLAvsWDIVB

    ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.40%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.