Skip to content

KNGZ vs WDIV

First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Dividend Aristocrats ETF

KNGZCNasdaq

State Street SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF

WDIVBNYSE Arca

Overlap

6.2%by weight

Expense ratio

WDIV −0.10pt a year

KNGZ0.50%WDIV0.40%

Avg volume · 30D

WDIV 1.3×the volume

KNGZ5.75KWDIV7.33K

5Y return · a year

KNGZ +1.6pt

KNGZ+11.0%WDIV+9.4%

KNGZ vs WDIV Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+68.4%KNGZ+56.8%WDIV

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. KNGZ +68.4%. WDIV +56.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%40%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
KNGZ 0.50%
WDIV 0.40%, better
Fund size
KNGZ $69M
WDIV $281M
1Y total return
KNGZ +25.9%, better
WDIV +19.5%
Yield (12M)
KNGZ 2.45%
WDIV 4.20%, better
Holdings
KNGZ 99
WDIV 114
Avg volume (30D)
KNGZ 5.75K sh
WDIV 7.33K sh, better
NAV per share
KNGZ $43.39
WDIV $82.68
52W range

ETF.net Grade

KNGZ: Cost 23, Risk 44, Mission 73, Tradability 30, Holdings 28, Durability 44. WDIV: Cost 41, Risk 70, Mission 74, Tradability 38, Holdings 74, Durability 61.
Pillar letters and Scores for KNGZ, WDIV, with each pillar’s weight
PillarKNGZWDIV
Cost30% weightF23C41Higher
Mission25% weightA73A74Higher
Risk15% weightC44A70Higher
Tradability15% weightD30D38Higher
Holdings10% weightD28A74Higher
Durability5% weightC44B61Higher

Rank among Dividend Aristocrats funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. KNGZ and WDIV are both graded against the same 7 Dividend Aristocrats funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Dividend Aristocrats⁠

Category · 7 funds
See all 7 ›

WDIV ranks 3rd and KNGZ 5th of 7 funds in the Dividend Aristocrats Category.

  1. Rank 1ASDYState Street SPDR S&P Dividend ETFScore 75
  2. Rank 2ANOBLProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETFScore 70
  3. Rank 3BREGLProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETFScore 57
  4. Rank 3BWDIVState Street SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETFScore 57
  5. Rank 5CKNGZFirst Trust S&P 500 Diversified Dividend Aristocrats ETFScore 41
  6. Rank 6CSNPDXtrackers S&P Dividend Aristocrats Screened ETFScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

KNGZCFirst Trust S&P 500 Diversified Dividend Aristocrats ETF

WDIVBState Street SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF

In short

KNGZ Dividend Aristocrats with a diversification rule bolted on: KNGZ tracks a sector-neutral S&P 500 dividend-grower index, so sector weights are set by design instead of drifting toward wherever the dividend growers happen to cluster.

WDIV Dividend aristocrats with a passport. WDIV screens the world for companies that have held or raised payouts for at least a decade, buys the top yielders, and caps how much any one stock, sector or country can matter.

Stated mandate

KNGZ The Fund seeks to track the price and yield of the S&P 500 Sector-Neutral Dividend Aristocrats Index. It normally invests at least 90% of assets in index securities and uses an indexing approach.

WDIV The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats Index.

Why people hold it

  • KNGZ The "diversified" in the name is structural: a sector-neutral index of roughly 100 dividend payers, so no single sector quietly becomes the whole portfolio.ftportfolios.com
  • Plain index plumbing: normally at least 90% of assets in index securities, no manager discretion, and it has stayed close to the benchmark it names.ftportfolios.com
  • Live since 2017 as a First Trust index tracker, with distributions on a quarterly schedule.
  • WDIV The aristocrat idea, exported. NOBL's bar is 25 straight years of US dividend hikes; WDIV's is 10 years of stable or rising payouts anywhere in the S&P Global BMI, a far bigger pond.ssga.comproshares.com
  • Diversification is written into the rulebook: 3% cap per stock, 25% ceiling per sector and per country, and no more than 20 names from any single country.ssga.com
  • Running since 2013 at 0.40%, level with the median fee in its dividend-aristocrat peer group, and it sits in the upper half of that group on our review.
  • A compact book of roughly 90 global dividend payers, distributing quarterly.

Worth knowing

  • KNGZ Cost is the trade-off: 0.50% a year against a 0.40% peer median, and SPDG runs sector-neutral S&P dividend exposure for 0.05%.
  • Thinly traded with a modest asset base, so spreads and order type matter more here than in the category's household names.
  • It sits in the lower half of its dividend-aristocrat peer group overall, with fee and trading costs, not index tracking, driving that.
  • WDIV 0.40% is the going rate among aristocrat funds, but plainer dividend index options in the same group cost far less (SPDG runs 0.05%).
  • Thinly traded next to the headline US dividend names, so spreads can be wider than the sticker fee suggests.
  • It is a yield-first screen on foreign shares: currency moves feed into returns, and a decade of merely stable dividends clears the bar alongside real growth.ssga.com

Full KNGZ profile⁠

Full WDIV profile⁠

KNGZ vs WDIV Holdings

How KNGZ and WDIV differ

Overlap by weight

6.2%

Shared holdings make up 8.5% of WDIV and 8.3% of KNGZ.

Level by level

  • Holdings6 in both6.2%
  • Countryby domicile26.7%
  • Sector11 Sectors47.1%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in KNGZ and WDIV, widest gap first
SectorMore in KNGZMore in WDIV
TechnologyKNGZ +40.2 points
UtilitiesWDIV +12.2 points
Real EstateWDIV +10.9 points
FinancialsWDIV +10.4 points
IndustrialsWDIV +7.3 points
Consumer DiscretionaryKNGZ +6.6 points
EnergyWDIV +5.0 points
Health CareKNGZ +4.7 points
MaterialsWDIV +4.1 points
Consumer StaplesWDIV +3.0 points
CommunicationKNGZ +1.4 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in KNGZ and WDIV, widest gap first
CountryMore in KNGZMore in WDIV
United StatesKNGZ +73.3 points
CanadaWDIV +13.2 points
United KingdomWDIV +9.2 points
SwitzerlandWDIV +8.9 points
JapanWDIV +8.0 points
ChinaWDIV +4.7 points
South KoreaWDIV +4.7 points
ItalyWDIV +3.9 points
Other countries (11)WDIV +20.6 points

Outside the US: WDIV 80% developed, 20% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • KNGZ36.1%
  • WDIV17.3%

Securities held

  • KNGZ98
  • WDIV92

Asset class

KNGZ
Equity
WDIV
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in KNGZ92
  • In both6
  • Only in WDIV86

Only in KNGZ

92 securities, 91.4% of KNGZ by weight

  • Accenture plc4.20%
  • Texas Instruments Incorporated4.13%
  • International Business Machines Corporation4.00%

Only in WDIV

86 securities, 91.0% of WDIV by weight

  • Lenovo Group Ltd2.21%
  • Legal & General Group PLC1.97%
  • Teleperformance1.81%

Weight gaps

All 6 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in KNGZ and WDIV, widest gap first
HoldingMore in KNGZMore in WDIV
Verizon Communications Inc.VZKNGZ +1.95 points
Altria Group, Inc.MOWDIV +0.82 points
Amcor plcAMCRWDIV +0.68 points
Edison InternationalEIXWDIV +0.63 points
ONEOK, Inc.OKEWDIV +0.11 points
Pfizer Inc.PFEKNGZ +0.09 points

All 98 KNGZ holdings⁠All 90 WDIV holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

KNGZ vs WDIV Cost

Overpaying KNGZ vs WDIV

$1,889

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • KNGZ 0.50%

    $9,979

  • WDIV 0.40%

    $8,090

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • KNGZ 0.50%
  • WDIV 0.40%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530KNGZ $9,979WDIV $8,090

Year by year

YearKNGZWDIVOverpaying
10$900$723$177
20$3,460$2,793$667
30$9,979$8,090$1,889

Expense ratio

  • 0.50%KNGZ
  • 0.40%WDIV, cheaper
  • Middle half of Dividend Aristocrats funds
  • Median 0.40%

WDIV 4th cheapest of 7 funds

KNGZ 6th cheapest of 7 funds

KNGZ vs WDIV Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
KNGZ 2.45%
WDIV 4.20%, better
Payout (12M)
KNGZ $1.06
WDIV $3.48
Last payment
KNGZ $0.26
WDIV $0.83
Ex-dividend
KNGZ Sep 24, 2026
WDIV Sep 21, 2026
Paid on
KNGZ Sep 30, 2026
WDIV Sep 23, 2026
Frequency
KNGZ Quarterly
WDIV Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

KNGZQuarterly · 37 paymentsAll KNGZ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 37 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Sep 21, 2017 $0.08; Dec 21, 2017 $0.16; Mar 22, 2018 $0.11; Jun 21, 2018 $0.33; Sep 14, 2018 $0.13; Dec 18, 2018 $0.22; Mar 21, 2019 $0.04; Jun 14, 2019 $0.16; Sep 25, 2019 $0.20; Dec 13, 2019 $0.28; Mar 26, 2020 $0.08; Jun 25, 2020 $0.20; Sep 24, 2020 $0.15; Dec 24, 2020 $0.17; Mar 25, 2021 $0.10; Jun 24, 2021 $0.15; Sep 23, 2021 $0.11; Dec 23, 2021 $0.24; Mar 25, 2022 $0.12; Jun 24, 2022 $0.18; Sep 23, 2022 $0.19; Dec 23, 2022 $0.21; Mar 24, 2023 $0.17; Jun 27, 2023 $0.25; Sep 22, 2023 $0.18; Dec 22, 2023 $0.33; Mar 21, 2024 $0.13; Jun 27, 2024 $0.22; Sep 26, 2024 $0.20; Dec 13, 2024 $0.27; Mar 27, 2025 $0.16; Jun 26, 2025 $0.24; Sep 25, 2025 $0.23; Dec 12, 2025 $0.34; Mar 26, 2026 $0.16; Jun 25, 2026 $0.31; Sep 24, 2026 $0.26. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD
WDIVQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll WDIV payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 17, 2017 $0.27; Jun 16, 2017 $0.92; Sep 15, 2017 $0.54; Dec 15, 2017 $0.83; Mar 16, 2018 $0.38; Jun 15, 2018 $0.80; Sep 21, 2018 $0.48; Dec 21, 2018 $1.08; Mar 18, 2019 $0.36; Jun 24, 2019 $1.01; Sep 23, 2019 $0.62; Dec 23, 2019 $0.86; Mar 23, 2020 $0.58; Jun 22, 2020 $0.75; Sep 21, 2020 $0.67; Dec 21, 2020 $1.36; Mar 22, 2021 $0.42; Jun 21, 2021 $0.77; Sep 20, 2021 $0.63; Dec 20, 2021 $0.93; Mar 21, 2022 $0.36; Jun 21, 2022 $1.27; Sep 19, 2022 $0.55; Dec 19, 2022 $0.82; Mar 20, 2023 $0.38; Jun 20, 2023 $1.11; Sep 18, 2023 $0.65; Dec 18, 2023 $0.73; Mar 18, 2024 $0.37; Jun 24, 2024 $1.21; Sep 23, 2024 $0.61; Dec 23, 2024 $0.69; Mar 24, 2025 $0.38; Jun 23, 2025 $1.31; Sep 22, 2025 $0.76; Dec 22, 2025 $0.76; Mar 23, 2026 $0.44; Jun 22, 2026 $1.44; Sep 21, 2026 $0.83. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD

KNGZ vs WDIV Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • KNGZ
  • WDIV
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: WDIV −22.1% · Oct 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
KNGZ 13.8%WDIV 11.1%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
KNGZ 1.17WDIV 1.41, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
KNGZ −19.7%, betterWDIV −22.1%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
KNGZ 0.90WDIV 0.72

Popular comparisons

  • KNGZCvsSDYA

    First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Dividend Aristocrats ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Dividend ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • WDIVBvsSDYA

    State Street SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Dividend ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KNGZCvsNOBLA

    First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Dividend Aristocrats ETF · ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • WDIVBvsNOBLA

    State Street SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF · ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KNGZCvsREGLB

    First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Dividend Aristocrats ETF · ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.40%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • WDIVBvsREGLB

    State Street SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF · ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.40%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.