REGL ranks 3rd and KNGZ 5th of 7 funds in the Dividend Aristocrats Category.
KNGZ vs REGL
REGL −0.10pt a year
0.50%0.40%
REGL 10.0×the volume
5.75K57.3K
KNGZ +3.1pt
+11.0%+7.9%
KNGZ vs REGL Performance
+68.4%+46.5%
- KNGZ 0.50%
- REGL 0.40%, better
- KNGZ $69M
- REGL $1.74B
- KNGZ +25.9%, better
- REGL +15.2%
- KNGZ 2.45%, better
- REGL 2.16%
- KNGZ 99
- REGL 66
- KNGZ 5.75K sh
- REGL 57.3K sh, better
- KNGZ $43.39
- REGL $91.90
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | KNGZ | REGL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F23 | C41Higher |
| Mission | A73 | A86Higher |
| Risk | C44Higher | D30 |
| Tradability | D30 | B63Higher |
| Holdings | D28 | B64Higher |
| Durability | C44 | B56Higher |
Rank among Dividend Aristocrats funds
Same Category. KNGZ and REGL are both graded against the same 7 Dividend Aristocrats funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
KNGZC
REGLB
In short
KNGZ Dividend Aristocrats with a diversification rule bolted on: KNGZ tracks a sector-neutral S&P 500 dividend-grower index, so sector weights are set by design instead of drifting toward wherever the dividend growers happen to cluster.
REGL The Dividend Aristocrats formula, one size down. REGL screens the S&P MidCap 400 for companies that have raised their dividend at least 15 straight years, landing on a compact roster of about 60 mid-cap payers.
Stated mandate
KNGZ The Fund seeks to track the price and yield of the S&P 500 Sector-Neutral Dividend Aristocrats Index. It normally invests at least 90% of assets in index securities and uses an indexing approach.
REGL REGL seeks pre-fee and pre-expense investment results that track the S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
KNGZ vs REGL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
KNGZ vs REGL Cost
Overpaying KNGZ vs REGL
$1,889
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
KNGZ 0.50%
$9,979
REGL 0.40%
$8,090
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | KNGZ | REGL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $723 | $177 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $2,793 | $667 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $8,090 | $1,889 |
- 0.50%KNGZ
- 0.40%REGL, cheaper
- Middle half of Dividend Aristocrats funds
- Median 0.40%
REGL 4th cheapest of 7 funds
KNGZ 6th cheapest of 7 funds
KNGZ vs REGL Dividends
- KNGZ 2.45%, better
- REGL 2.16%
- KNGZ $1.06
- REGL $1.99
- KNGZ $0.26
- REGL $0.40
- KNGZ Sep 24, 2026
- REGL Sep 23, 2026
- KNGZ Sep 30, 2026
- REGL Sep 29, 2026
- KNGZ Quarterly
- REGL Quarterly
Distribution history
KNGZ vs REGL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- KNGZ
- REGL
Risk facts
- Volatility
- KNGZ 13.8%, betterREGL 15.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- KNGZ 1.17, betterREGL 0.72
- Worst fall
- KNGZ −19.7%REGL −17.0%, better
- Market sensitivity
- KNGZ 0.90REGL 0.64
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.