Skip to content

KNGZ vs REGL

First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Dividend Aristocrats ETF

KNGZCNasdaq

ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF

REGLBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

REGL −0.10pt a year

KNGZ0.50%REGL0.40%

Avg volume · 30D

REGL 10.0×the volume

KNGZ5.75KREGL57.3K

5Y return · a year

KNGZ +3.1pt

KNGZ+11.0%REGL+7.9%

KNGZ vs REGL Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+68.4%KNGZ+46.5%REGL

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. KNGZ +68.4%. REGL +46.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%20%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
KNGZ 0.50%
REGL 0.40%, better
Fund size
KNGZ $69M
REGL $1.74B
1Y total return
KNGZ +25.9%, better
REGL +15.2%
Yield (12M)
KNGZ 2.45%, better
REGL 2.16%
Holdings
KNGZ 99
REGL 66
Avg volume (30D)
KNGZ 5.75K sh
REGL 57.3K sh, better
NAV per share
KNGZ $43.39
REGL $91.90
52W range

ETF.net Grade

KNGZ: Cost 23, Risk 44, Mission 73, Tradability 30, Holdings 28, Durability 44. REGL: Cost 41, Risk 30, Mission 86, Tradability 63, Holdings 64, Durability 56.
Pillar letters and Scores for KNGZ, REGL, with each pillar’s weight
PillarKNGZREGL
Cost30% weightF23C41Higher
Mission25% weightA73A86Higher
Risk15% weightC44HigherD30
Tradability15% weightD30B63Higher
Holdings10% weightD28B64Higher
Durability5% weightC44B56Higher

Rank among Dividend Aristocrats funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. KNGZ and REGL are both graded against the same 7 Dividend Aristocrats funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Dividend Aristocrats⁠

Category · 7 funds
See all 7 ›

REGL ranks 3rd and KNGZ 5th of 7 funds in the Dividend Aristocrats Category.

  1. Rank 1ASDYState Street SPDR S&P Dividend ETFScore 75
  2. Rank 2ANOBLProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETFScore 70
  3. Rank 3BREGLProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETFScore 57
  4. Rank 3BWDIVState Street SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETFScore 57
  5. Rank 5CKNGZFirst Trust S&P 500 Diversified Dividend Aristocrats ETFScore 41
  6. Rank 6CSNPDXtrackers S&P Dividend Aristocrats Screened ETFScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

KNGZCFirst Trust S&P 500 Diversified Dividend Aristocrats ETF

REGLBProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF

In short

KNGZ Dividend Aristocrats with a diversification rule bolted on: KNGZ tracks a sector-neutral S&P 500 dividend-grower index, so sector weights are set by design instead of drifting toward wherever the dividend growers happen to cluster.

REGL The Dividend Aristocrats formula, one size down. REGL screens the S&P MidCap 400 for companies that have raised their dividend at least 15 straight years, landing on a compact roster of about 60 mid-cap payers.

Stated mandate

KNGZ The Fund seeks to track the price and yield of the S&P 500 Sector-Neutral Dividend Aristocrats Index. It normally invests at least 90% of assets in index securities and uses an indexing approach.

REGL REGL seeks pre-fee and pre-expense investment results that track the S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats Index.

Why people hold it

  • KNGZ The "diversified" in the name is structural: a sector-neutral index of roughly 100 dividend payers, so no single sector quietly becomes the whole portfolio.ftportfolios.com
  • Plain index plumbing: normally at least 90% of assets in index securities, no manager discretion, and it has stayed close to the benchmark it names.ftportfolios.com
  • Live since 2017 as a First Trust index tracker, with distributions on a quarterly schedule.
  • REGL The 15-year raise streak is a quality filter in disguise: a company needs a decade and a half of intact cash flow to get in, and it drops out when the streak breaks.proshares.comyahoo.com
  • Mid-cap dividend growth is a thin shelf. Running since 2015 and now a multi-billion-dollar fund, this is the established wrapper for the idea, not a lightly used experiment.proshares.com
  • It sticks close to its index, so the methodology on paper is what actually shows up in the portfolio. No manager discretion to second-guess.
  • Cash comes back quarterly, in step with the payout rhythm of the companies inside.

Worth knowing

  • KNGZ Cost is the trade-off: 0.50% a year against a 0.40% peer median, and SPDG runs sector-neutral S&P dividend exposure for 0.05%.
  • Thinly traded with a modest asset base, so spreads and order type matter more here than in the category's household names.
  • It sits in the lower half of its dividend-aristocrat peer group overall, with fee and trading costs, not index tracking, driving that.
  • REGL 0.40% is dead-on the median for aristocrat-style funds, but broad dividend index products price near 0.05% (SPDG). The mid-cap screen is what the extra buys.
  • About 60 names is a narrow roster carved out of a 400-stock universe, so individual companies and sector tilts carry real weight here.
  • Trading is moderate rather than heavy, which matters more on size than on a small order.

Full KNGZ profile⁠

Full REGL profile⁠

KNGZ vs REGL Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

KNGZ vs REGL Cost

Overpaying KNGZ vs REGL

$1,889

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • KNGZ 0.50%

    $9,979

  • REGL 0.40%

    $8,090

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • KNGZ 0.50%
  • REGL 0.40%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530KNGZ $9,979REGL $8,090

Year by year

YearKNGZREGLOverpaying
10$900$723$177
20$3,460$2,793$667
30$9,979$8,090$1,889

Expense ratio

  • 0.50%KNGZ
  • 0.40%REGL, cheaper
  • Middle half of Dividend Aristocrats funds
  • Median 0.40%

REGL 4th cheapest of 7 funds

KNGZ 6th cheapest of 7 funds

KNGZ vs REGL Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
KNGZ 2.45%, better
REGL 2.16%
Payout (12M)
KNGZ $1.06
REGL $1.99
Last payment
KNGZ $0.26
REGL $0.40
Ex-dividend
KNGZ Sep 24, 2026
REGL Sep 23, 2026
Paid on
KNGZ Sep 30, 2026
REGL Sep 29, 2026
Frequency
KNGZ Quarterly
REGL Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

KNGZQuarterly · 37 paymentsAll KNGZ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 37 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Sep 21, 2017 $0.08; Dec 21, 2017 $0.16; Mar 22, 2018 $0.11; Jun 21, 2018 $0.33; Sep 14, 2018 $0.13; Dec 18, 2018 $0.22; Mar 21, 2019 $0.04; Jun 14, 2019 $0.16; Sep 25, 2019 $0.20; Dec 13, 2019 $0.28; Mar 26, 2020 $0.08; Jun 25, 2020 $0.20; Sep 24, 2020 $0.15; Dec 24, 2020 $0.17; Mar 25, 2021 $0.10; Jun 24, 2021 $0.15; Sep 23, 2021 $0.11; Dec 23, 2021 $0.24; Mar 25, 2022 $0.12; Jun 24, 2022 $0.18; Sep 23, 2022 $0.19; Dec 23, 2022 $0.21; Mar 24, 2023 $0.17; Jun 27, 2023 $0.25; Sep 22, 2023 $0.18; Dec 22, 2023 $0.33; Mar 21, 2024 $0.13; Jun 27, 2024 $0.22; Sep 26, 2024 $0.20; Dec 13, 2024 $0.27; Mar 27, 2025 $0.16; Jun 26, 2025 $0.24; Sep 25, 2025 $0.23; Dec 12, 2025 $0.34; Mar 26, 2026 $0.16; Jun 25, 2026 $0.31; Sep 24, 2026 $0.26. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD
REGLQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll REGL payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 22, 2017 $0.18; Jun 21, 2017 $0.22; Sep 27, 2017 $0.22; Dec 26, 2017 $0.27; Mar 21, 2018 $0.26; Jun 20, 2018 $0.24; Sep 26, 2018 $0.32; Dec 26, 2018 $0.27; Mar 20, 2019 $0.18; Jun 25, 2019 $0.32; Sep 25, 2019 $0.33; Dec 24, 2019 $0.35; Mar 25, 2020 $0.39; Jun 24, 2020 $0.30; Sep 23, 2020 $0.30; Dec 23, 2020 $0.51; Mar 23, 2021 $0.33; Jun 22, 2021 $0.49; Sep 22, 2021 $0.43; Dec 23, 2021 $0.59; Mar 23, 2022 $0.37; Jun 22, 2022 $0.37; Sep 21, 2022 $0.38; Dec 22, 2022 $0.55; Mar 22, 2023 $0.38; Jun 21, 2023 $0.34; Sep 20, 2023 $0.40; Dec 20, 2023 $0.64; Mar 20, 2024 $0.31; Jun 26, 2024 $0.53; Sep 25, 2024 $0.39; Dec 23, 2024 $0.61; Mar 26, 2025 $0.52; Jun 25, 2025 $0.38; Sep 24, 2025 $0.44; Dec 24, 2025 $0.61; Mar 25, 2026 $0.51; Jun 24, 2026 $0.46; Sep 23, 2026 $0.40. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD

KNGZ vs REGL Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • KNGZ
  • REGL
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: KNGZ −19.7% · Sep 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
KNGZ 13.8%, betterREGL 15.1%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
KNGZ 1.17, betterREGL 0.72
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
KNGZ −19.7%REGL −17.0%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
KNGZ 0.90REGL 0.64

Popular comparisons

  • KNGZCvsSDYA

    First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Dividend Aristocrats ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Dividend ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • REGLBvsSDYA

    ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Dividend ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KNGZCvsNOBLA

    First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Dividend Aristocrats ETF · ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • REGLBvsNOBLA

    ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF · ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KNGZCvsWDIVB

    First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Dividend Aristocrats ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.40%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • REGLBvsWDIVB

    ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.40%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.