Skip to content

REGL vs WDIV

ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF

REGLBCboe

State Street SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF

WDIVBNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

REGL0.40%WDIV0.40%

Avg volume · 30D

REGL 7.8×the volume

REGL57.3KWDIV7.33K

10Y return · a year

REGL +2.0pt

REGL+9.8%WDIV+7.8%

REGL vs WDIV Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+46.5%REGL+56.8%WDIV

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. REGL +46.5%. WDIV +56.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
REGL 0.40%
WDIV 0.40%
Fund size
REGL $1.74B
WDIV $281M
1Y total return
REGL +15.2%
WDIV +19.5%, better
Yield (12M)
REGL 2.16%
WDIV 4.20%, better
Holdings
REGL 66
WDIV 114
Avg volume (30D)
REGL 57.3K sh, better
WDIV 7.33K sh
NAV per share
REGL $91.90
WDIV $82.68
52W range

ETF.net Grade

REGL: Cost 41, Risk 30, Mission 86, Tradability 63, Holdings 64, Durability 56. WDIV: Cost 41, Risk 70, Mission 74, Tradability 38, Holdings 74, Durability 61.
Pillar letters and Scores for REGL, WDIV, with each pillar’s weight
PillarREGLWDIV
Cost30% weightC41C41
Mission25% weightA86HigherA74
Risk15% weightD30A70Higher
Tradability15% weightB63HigherD38
Holdings10% weightB64A74Higher
Durability5% weightB56B61Higher

Rank among Dividend Aristocrats funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. REGL and WDIV are both graded against the same 7 Dividend Aristocrats funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Dividend Aristocrats⁠

Category · 7 funds
See all 7 ›

REGL ranks 3rd and WDIV 3rd of 7 funds in the Dividend Aristocrats Category.

  1. Rank 1ASDYState Street SPDR S&P Dividend ETFScore 75
  2. Rank 2ANOBLProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETFScore 70
  3. Rank 3BREGLProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETFScore 57
  4. Rank 3BWDIVState Street SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETFScore 57
  5. Rank 5CKNGZFirst Trust S&P 500 Diversified Dividend Aristocrats ETFScore 41

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

REGLBProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF

WDIVBState Street SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF

In short

REGL The Dividend Aristocrats formula, one size down. REGL screens the S&P MidCap 400 for companies that have raised their dividend at least 15 straight years, landing on a compact roster of about 60 mid-cap payers.

WDIV Dividend aristocrats with a passport. WDIV screens the world for companies that have held or raised payouts for at least a decade, buys the top yielders, and caps how much any one stock, sector or country can matter.

Stated mandate

REGL REGL seeks pre-fee and pre-expense investment results that track the S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats Index.

WDIV The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats Index.

Why people hold it

  • REGL The 15-year raise streak is a quality filter in disguise: a company needs a decade and a half of intact cash flow to get in, and it drops out when the streak breaks.proshares.comyahoo.com
  • Mid-cap dividend growth is a thin shelf. Running since 2015 and now a multi-billion-dollar fund, this is the established wrapper for the idea, not a lightly used experiment.proshares.com
  • It sticks close to its index, so the methodology on paper is what actually shows up in the portfolio. No manager discretion to second-guess.
  • Cash comes back quarterly, in step with the payout rhythm of the companies inside.
  • WDIV The aristocrat idea, exported. NOBL's bar is 25 straight years of US dividend hikes; WDIV's is 10 years of stable or rising payouts anywhere in the S&P Global BMI, a far bigger pond.ssga.comproshares.com
  • Diversification is written into the rulebook: 3% cap per stock, 25% ceiling per sector and per country, and no more than 20 names from any single country.ssga.com
  • Running since 2013 at 0.40%, level with the median fee in its dividend-aristocrat peer group, and it sits in the upper half of that group on our review.
  • A compact book of roughly 90 global dividend payers, distributing quarterly.

Worth knowing

  • REGL 0.40% is dead-on the median for aristocrat-style funds, but broad dividend index products price near 0.05% (SPDG). The mid-cap screen is what the extra buys.
  • About 60 names is a narrow roster carved out of a 400-stock universe, so individual companies and sector tilts carry real weight here.
  • Trading is moderate rather than heavy, which matters more on size than on a small order.
  • WDIV 0.40% is the going rate among aristocrat funds, but plainer dividend index options in the same group cost far less (SPDG runs 0.05%).
  • Thinly traded next to the headline US dividend names, so spreads can be wider than the sticker fee suggests.
  • It is a yield-first screen on foreign shares: currency moves feed into returns, and a decade of merely stable dividends clears the bar alongside real growth.ssga.com

Full REGL profile⁠

Full WDIV profile⁠

REGL vs WDIV Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

REGL vs WDIV Cost

Same expense ratio

$8,090

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • REGL 0.40%

    $8,090

  • WDIV 0.40%

    $8,090

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • REGL 0.40%
  • WDIV 0.40%
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530REGL $8,090WDIV $8,090

Year by year

YearREGLWDIV
10$723$723
20$2,793$2,793
30$8,090$8,090

Expense ratio

  • 0.40%REGL
  • 0.40%WDIV
  • Middle half of Dividend Aristocrats funds
  • Median 0.40%

REGL 4th cheapest of 7 funds

WDIV 4th cheapest of 7 funds

REGL vs WDIV Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
REGL 2.16%
WDIV 4.20%, better
Payout (12M)
REGL $1.99
WDIV $3.48
Last payment
REGL $0.40
WDIV $0.83
Ex-dividend
REGL Sep 23, 2026
WDIV Sep 21, 2026
Paid on
REGL Sep 29, 2026
WDIV Sep 23, 2026
Frequency
REGL Quarterly
WDIV Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

REGLQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll REGL payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 22, 2017 $0.18; Jun 21, 2017 $0.22; Sep 27, 2017 $0.22; Dec 26, 2017 $0.27; Mar 21, 2018 $0.26; Jun 20, 2018 $0.24; Sep 26, 2018 $0.32; Dec 26, 2018 $0.27; Mar 20, 2019 $0.18; Jun 25, 2019 $0.32; Sep 25, 2019 $0.33; Dec 24, 2019 $0.35; Mar 25, 2020 $0.39; Jun 24, 2020 $0.30; Sep 23, 2020 $0.30; Dec 23, 2020 $0.51; Mar 23, 2021 $0.33; Jun 22, 2021 $0.49; Sep 22, 2021 $0.43; Dec 23, 2021 $0.59; Mar 23, 2022 $0.37; Jun 22, 2022 $0.37; Sep 21, 2022 $0.38; Dec 22, 2022 $0.55; Mar 22, 2023 $0.38; Jun 21, 2023 $0.34; Sep 20, 2023 $0.40; Dec 20, 2023 $0.64; Mar 20, 2024 $0.31; Jun 26, 2024 $0.53; Sep 25, 2024 $0.39; Dec 23, 2024 $0.61; Mar 26, 2025 $0.52; Jun 25, 2025 $0.38; Sep 24, 2025 $0.44; Dec 24, 2025 $0.61; Mar 25, 2026 $0.51; Jun 24, 2026 $0.46; Sep 23, 2026 $0.40. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD
WDIVQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll WDIV payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 17, 2017 $0.27; Jun 16, 2017 $0.92; Sep 15, 2017 $0.54; Dec 15, 2017 $0.83; Mar 16, 2018 $0.38; Jun 15, 2018 $0.80; Sep 21, 2018 $0.48; Dec 21, 2018 $1.08; Mar 18, 2019 $0.36; Jun 24, 2019 $1.01; Sep 23, 2019 $0.62; Dec 23, 2019 $0.86; Mar 23, 2020 $0.58; Jun 22, 2020 $0.75; Sep 21, 2020 $0.67; Dec 21, 2020 $1.36; Mar 22, 2021 $0.42; Jun 21, 2021 $0.77; Sep 20, 2021 $0.63; Dec 20, 2021 $0.93; Mar 21, 2022 $0.36; Jun 21, 2022 $1.27; Sep 19, 2022 $0.55; Dec 19, 2022 $0.82; Mar 20, 2023 $0.38; Jun 20, 2023 $1.11; Sep 18, 2023 $0.65; Dec 18, 2023 $0.73; Mar 18, 2024 $0.37; Jun 24, 2024 $1.21; Sep 23, 2024 $0.61; Dec 23, 2024 $0.69; Mar 24, 2025 $0.38; Jun 23, 2025 $1.31; Sep 22, 2025 $0.76; Dec 22, 2025 $0.76; Mar 23, 2026 $0.44; Jun 22, 2026 $1.44; Sep 21, 2026 $0.83. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD

REGL vs WDIV Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • REGL
  • WDIV
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: WDIV −22.1% · Oct 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
REGL 15.1%WDIV 11.1%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
REGL 0.72WDIV 1.41, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
REGL −17.0%, betterWDIV −22.1%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
REGL 0.64WDIV 0.72

Popular comparisons

  • REGLBvsSDYA

    ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Dividend ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • WDIVBvsSDYA

    State Street SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Dividend ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • REGLBvsNOBLA

    ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF · ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • WDIVBvsNOBLA

    State Street SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF · ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • REGLBvsKNGZC

    ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF · First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Dividend Aristocrats ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • WDIVBvsKNGZC

    State Street SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF · First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Dividend Aristocrats ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.