KOMP ranks 2nd and MINV 30th of 30 funds in the Disruptive Innovation Category.
KOMP vs MINV
KOMP −0.59pt a year
0.20%0.79%
KOMP 7.7×the volume
68.9K8.91K
MINV +5.9pt
+19.2%+25.1%
KOMP vs MINV Performance
+1.6%+21.8%
- KOMP 0.20%, better
- MINV 0.79%
- KOMP $2.39B
- MINV $147M
- KOMP +1.6%
- MINV +21.8%, better
- KOMP 1.63%, better
- MINV 1.24%
- KOMP 501
- MINV 53
- KOMP 68.9K sh, better
- MINV 8.91K sh
- KOMP $60.11
- MINV $42.07
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | KOMP | MINV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | F5 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B58Higher | C51 |
| Tradability | A78Higher | D26 |
| Holdings | A89Higher | C51 |
| Durability | A89Higher | C48 |
Rank among Disruptive Innovation funds
Same Category. KOMP and MINV are both graded against the same 30 Disruptive Innovation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
KOMPA
MINVD
In short
KOMP Most thematic funds bet on one idea. KOMP buys the whole Fourth Industrial Revolution: 20-plus Kensho subsectors, from robotics to genetic engineering, spread across roughly 500 global stocks for 0.20% a year.
MINV Most disruptive-innovation ETFs shop in Silicon Valley. This one hunts in Asia ex-Japan, with a manager hand-picking roughly 40 stocks instead of tracking an index, run by a firm that has covered the region since 1991.
Stated mandate
KOMP The Fund seeks investment results that generally correspond, before fees and expenses, to the total return performance of the S&P Kensho New Economies Composite Index.
MINV The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation by investing at least 80% of net assets in common and preferred stocks of Asia-located companies that Matthews identifies as innovators in products, services, processes, business models, management, technology use, or market development.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
KOMP vs MINV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
KOMP vs MINV Cost
Overpaying MINV vs KOMP
$11,019
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
KOMP 0.20%
$4,155
MINV 0.79%
$15,174
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | KOMP | MINV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $365 | $1,405 | $1,040 |
| 20 | $1,421 | $5,331 | $3,910 |
| 30 | $4,155 | $15,174 | $11,019 |
- 0.20%KOMP, cheaper
- 0.79%MINV
- Middle half of Disruptive Innovation funds
- Median 0.65%
KOMP cheapest of 30 funds
MINV 28th cheapest of 30 funds
KOMP vs MINV Dividends
- KOMP 1.63%, better
- MINV 1.24%
- KOMP $1.02
- MINV $0.53
- KOMP $0.13
- MINV $0.53
- KOMP Sep 21, 2026
- MINV Dec 17, 2025
- KOMP Sep 23, 2026
- MINV Dec 22, 2025
- KOMP Quarterly
- MINV Annual
Distribution history
KOMP vs MINV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- KOMP 22.3%, betterMINV 26.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- KOMP 0.76MINV 0.86, better
- Worst fall
- KOMP −45.0%MINV −30.0%
- Market sensitivity
- KOMP 1.65MINV 1.38
KOMP and MINV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.20% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.46%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.46%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

