XT ranks 1st and KOMP 2nd of 30 funds in the Disruptive Innovation Category.
KOMP vs XT
KOMP −0.26pt a year
0.20%0.46%
KOMP 1.01×the volume
70K69.1K
XT +6.7pt
+0.6%+7.3%
KOMP vs XT Performance
+3.2%+42.3%
- KOMP 0.20%, better
- XT 0.46%
- KOMP $2.57B
- XT $3.98B
- KOMP −1.6%
- XT +20.1%, better
- KOMP 1.63%
- XT 6.82%, better
- KOMP 501
- XT 216
- KOMP 70K sh, better
- XT 69.1K sh
- KOMP $64.63
- XT $83.53
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | KOMP | XT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | A95 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B55 | A91Higher |
| Tradability | A77 | A77 |
| Holdings | A88Higher | B66 |
| Durability | A88 | A96Higher |
Rank among Disruptive Innovation funds
Same Category. KOMP and XT are both graded against the same 30 Disruptive Innovation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
KOMPA
XTA
In short
KOMP Most thematic funds bet on one idea. KOMP buys the whole Fourth Industrial Revolution: 20-plus Kensho subsectors, from robotics to genetic engineering, spread across roughly 500 global stocks for 0.20% a year.
XT Innovation, spread thin on purpose. XT holds roughly 200 global companies scored by Morningstar analysts for exposure to a handful of exponential tech themes, so no single moonshot carries the fund.
Stated mandate
KOMP The Fund seeks investment results that generally correspond, before fees and expenses, to the total return performance of the S&P Kensho New Economies Composite Index.
XT XT seeks to track an index of stocks from developed and emerging markets whose companies create or use exponential technologies. The strategy targets technologies with potential economic benefits, including the ability to displace older technologies or create new markets.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
KOMP vs XT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
KOMP vs XT Cost
Overpaying XT vs KOMP
$5,075
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
KOMP 0.20%
$4,155
XT 0.46%
$9,230
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | KOMP | XT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $365 | $830 | $465 |
| 20 | $1,421 | $3,195 | $1,774 |
| 30 | $4,155 | $9,230 | $5,075 |
- 0.20%KOMP, cheaper
- 0.46%XT
- Middle half of Disruptive Innovation funds
- Median 0.65%
KOMP cheapest of 30 funds
XT 3rd cheapest of 30 funds
KOMP vs XT Dividends
- KOMP 1.63%
- XT 6.82%, better
- KOMP $1.02
- XT $5.69
- KOMP $0.13
- XT $0.36
- KOMP Sep 21, 2026
- XT Jun 15, 2026
- KOMP Sep 23, 2026
- XT Jun 18, 2026
- KOMP Quarterly
- XT Twice a year
Distribution history
KOMP vs XT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- KOMP
- XT
Risk facts
- Volatility
- KOMP 22.3%XT 16.5%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- KOMP 0.76XT 1.08, better
- Worst fall
- KOMP −45.4%XT −34.4%, better
- Market sensitivity
- KOMP 1.65XT 1.35
KOMP and XT in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.20% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.46% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.46% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.46% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


