KOMP ranks 2nd and TRFM 3rd of 30 funds in the Disruptive Innovation Category.
KOMP vs TRFM
KOMP −0.29pt a year
0.20%0.49%
KOMP 1.7×the volume
70K40.1K
KOMP vs TRFM Performance
−1.6%+5.8%
- KOMP 0.20%, better
- TRFM 0.49%
- KOMP $2.57B
- TRFM $313M
- KOMP −1.6%
- TRFM +5.8%, better
- KOMP 1.63%
- TRFM
- KOMP 501
- TRFM 266
- KOMP 70K sh, better
- TRFM 40.1K sh
- KOMP $64.63
- TRFM $53.79
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | KOMP | TRFM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | A81 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B55 | B66Higher |
| Tradability | A77Higher | A70 |
| Holdings | A88 | A89Higher |
| Durability | A88Higher | C50 |
Rank among Disruptive Innovation funds
Same Category. KOMP and TRFM are both graded against the same 30 Disruptive Innovation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
KOMPA
TRFMA
In short
KOMP Most thematic funds bet on one idea. KOMP buys the whole Fourth Industrial Revolution: 20-plus Kensho subsectors, from robotics to genetic engineering, spread across roughly 500 global stocks for 0.20% a year.
TRFM Most disruption funds buy the story. TRFM screens for companies actually writing R&D checks, then spreads the theme across a couple hundred US-listed names instead of a concentrated bet on thirty.
Stated mandate
KOMP The Fund seeks investment results that generally correspond, before fees and expenses, to the total return performance of the S&P Kensho New Economies Composite Index.
TRFM The Fund passively tracks the total return of the Pence Transformers Index before fees and expenses. The index targets U.S.-listed equity securities of companies positioned to benefit from significant changes in consumer behavior and technological innovation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
KOMP vs TRFM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
KOMP vs TRFM Cost
Overpaying TRFM vs KOMP
$5,637
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
KOMP 0.20%
$4,155
TRFM 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | KOMP | TRFM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $365 | $883 | $518 |
| 20 | $1,421 | $3,394 | $1,973 |
| 30 | $4,155 | $9,792 | $5,637 |
- 0.20%KOMP, cheaper
- 0.49%TRFM
- Middle half of Disruptive Innovation funds
- Median 0.65%
KOMP cheapest of 30 funds
TRFM 4th cheapest of 30 funds
KOMP vs TRFM Dividends
- KOMP 1.63%
- TRFM
- KOMP $1.02
- TRFM
- KOMP $0.13
- TRFM $0.08
- KOMP Sep 21, 2026
- TRFM Dec 31, 2025
- KOMP Sep 23, 2026
- TRFM Jan 5, 2026
- KOMP Quarterly
- TRFM Irregular
Distribution history
KOMP vs TRFM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- KOMP 22.3%, betterTRFM 23.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- KOMP 0.76TRFM 1.02, better
- Worst fall
- KOMP −45.4%TRFM −28.4%
- Market sensitivity
- KOMP 1.65TRFM 1.64
KOMP and TRFM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.20% · 0.46%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.46%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

